Originally posted by jcs:
They look confused out there...our all pro MLB Warner is making mistakes he never does. There is clearly a lack of communication out there. This is all coaching IMO.
There are 597 users in the forums
Originally posted by jcs:
They look confused out there...our all pro MLB Warner is making mistakes he never does. There is clearly a lack of communication out there. This is all coaching IMO.
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
Growing pains, DR and the defense will get better.
Originally posted by thl408:plus as young said.... this team is not getting coached up well in many peoples opinion,. who exactly is the leader of the defense. fred? even he looks lost. i never thought i would see our defense bumble and stumble around and then to top it off.. just let rodgers and adams do exactly what we thought they were going to try to do. we could not have layed down any better for them. but kyle sounds like he was ok with it. jesus
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
If we had Verrett we win that game. Sigh
jason was a huge loss but this defense should not have just totally collapsed like it has
They look confused out there...our all pro MLB Warner is making mistakes he never does. There is clearly a lack of communication out there. This is all coaching IMO.
I think they were short on CBs after losing Kwaun and Norman. Ward had to play CB and Hufanga came in on that final Adams catch. That sucked. It's on Lenior though - he played it like he was playing Cover 3, bailing at the snap.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
Growing pains, DR and the defense will get better.
That's the problem, We can't really afford growing pains when we're supposed to be competing for a super bowl.
Originally posted by Young2Owens:We need to give Ryan's at least 2 seasons to evaluate if he's good or not. His growing pains are reminiscent of Saleh's in his first 2 years. Saleh also struggled with his schemes when our DBs were weak.
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Samson Ebukam on the difference in style between the Rams and 49ers for his DE position:
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) June 2, 2021
"With the Rams, I was reading. But here, it's just attack, don't read.
"I'm gonna have to make a 180 here. Attack, and the people behind me will clean it up."
This is a nice vid on what the Rams did last season (Tite front, two gap). It's true what Samson said. (good part starts at @ 2:20)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKeEtHfY7PA
Wow, Thl, can we pin this? That Staley is one smart dude. 1st yr Rams DC gets him Charger HC. Not too shabby. He must be really sharp, like the Kyle of Ds.
As for the 4-3FAST, you did note which # the FAST was attached to? But i wasn't thinking the Brandon Staley D....like it was stated, not every team has a Donald that eats up two blockers nor do they have a Jalen Ramsey that absolutely takes their #1 WR out of the game. My thot was that Demeco was saying what has been noted above....we'd see more LB blitzing....or corners.
I linked the Rams video just to show what Samson was doing last season.
That is the one best vid i have seen in a long time. It is terrific...and so was the Rams D...with two 5 star players. That helped too. But i agree completely wtih your first post above. Demeco was talking (i think) about LBs/CB blitzing. We all wished we had seen more of that from Saleh. But he stayed pretty true to 4 man DL rush, straight up
oops...i miscalled Samson both Stanley and Staley. My mistakes. I'd still like to see this pinned for quick review. Watched it 6x already.
Originally posted by Heroism:
hey thl, have you watched any Seattle games? I haven't really been paying attention to them, but I did see a Seahawks X's & O's guy mention something about how they've moved from their traditional 4-3 under to a 4-3 tite front as their base.
Originally posted by thl408:
As far I understand, the Tite front is a 5 man front, so 4-3 Tite sounds weird. I have not watched SEA games but I may be able to access their games to find out tonight. If I were to describe Tite using common terms, I'd say it's a 3-4 Bear front.
Originally posted by lamontb:
Seems like GB had 5 man fronts
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by thl408:
As far I understand, the Tite front is a 5 man front, so 4-3 Tite sounds weird. I have not watched SEA games but I may be able to access their games to find out tonight. If I were to describe Tite using common terms, I'd say it's a 3-4 Bear front.
Whoops, that's my mistake. I accidentally typed 4-3 under twice and forgot to delete the 4-3 when I rewrote tite front.