Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 498 users in the forums

DeMeco Ryans, Texans HC

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
how are you suppose to get to Rogers when he was constantly getting rid of the ball under 2 secs even if our pass rushers beat their guy it didn't matter.


Why is a 4.7 rookie safety playing the single high? That formation also literally had our 5-9 Slot CB on a 6-5 giant.

Our matchups dictated how easy it was for Rodgers to just chuck it. I've seen too many mistakes like this from Demeco so far including the last drive that had rookies over Adams.

Yup...an experienced QB instantly singles a weakness up and goes after rookies and D.Johnson 1on1. Smart.

Who was the CB Rodgers went after a couple years ago for the late win?
[ Edited by NCommand on Sep 30, 2021 at 12:20 PM ]
  • jcs
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,844
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
how are you suppose to get to Rogers when he was constantly getting rid of the ball under 2 secs even if our pass rushers beat their guy it didn't matter.


Why is a 4.7 rookie safety playing the single high? That formation also literally had our 5-9 Slot CB on a 6-5 giant.

Our matchups dictated how easy it was for Rodgers to just chuck it. I've seen too many mistakes like this from Demeco so far including the last drive that had rookies over Adams.

Yup...an experienced QB instantly singles a weakness up and goes after rookies and D.Johnson 1on1. Smart.

Who was the CB Rodgers went after a couple years ago for the late win?

Had to look it up....G.Mabin.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
Growing pains, DR and the defense will get better.

That's the problem, We can't really afford growing pains when we're supposed to be competing for a super bowl.

EXACTLY thank god sickaa.. i have been harping on this for days.......... the montra on the zone for a majority of fans was.. best lineup in the nfl. we are ready now to win.. which i thought was the whole point why they did not give the keys right away to trey cuz we were built to win now........ now suddenly in the dark of night.. we hear the growing pains excuse, and people who said we were built to win now are either silent or pretend they never said or thought that. if three months ago. i would have said.. i think our dc is going to have growing pains which will lead us to lose some games we should not lose which could cost us a playoff spot...... you would have had posters run to the mods saying i need to be banned for being negative

Patience guys, it's a 17 game season there's plenty of time to adjust and gel together. New DC, same scheme but different ways of playcalling. Defense will get better IMO, we have the talent up front just a little concerned about our secondary. Bosa and Ford are coming off of serious injuries and will take time to get to full football speed. This defense feeds off of the pass rush and as soon as our pass rush gets to midseason form the better our defense will perform as a whole. This is the time you can afford to make mistakes and correct it for the long run it's only the beginning of the season. Patience...
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,298
Originally posted by All22:
Watching the All22 of the Vikings-Seahawks game. The Vikings screen game is on point. Counter run seems to work but outside zone and inside zone are getting shut down.

Edit: yep, Minnesota is all counters, cutbacks, and checkdowns. Kurt is using checkdowns to the RB as the first read ala Alex Smith.

Thanks for doing that legwork. I think that's definitely one solution, counters, in other words, pulling an OL to the playside which is in essence buying another gap. Power, counters, both involve pulling an OL so that there is an additional gap to the playside that wasn't there before. Was MIN also using a fullback on their successful counter runs?
  • titan
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,292
Not sure what he can do to improve the pass rush. I think that's the only real way we can help our DB's.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Wow, that video is awesome and super informative. I hope that dude is getting paid because it probably took him weeks, maybe months, to make that video.

Originally posted by thl408:
So let's move the discussion along. How does an outside zone scheme counter this Tite front, because that question is coming for all these offenses that have adopted the Shanahan version of outside zone. Kyle has gotten himself a QB that can allow him to play 11 v 11 in the running game. Is it trying to power through the B/C gaps with inside zone? More WR end arounds that try to capture the edge with more speed than what a RB can provide? Toss sweeps that try to avoid the "bear-like" front by out running those 3 IDL? This might belong in the Kyle thread but whatever.

It seems like quick-hitting gap concepts would be the way to. OL being able to get off the ball and get on their blocks/get vertical immediately instead of having to double and climb.

I'm not X's and O's guy, it seems like counter plays and getting the QB involved in the run game would be a massive pain in the ass for a tite front.

It really is a well done video. I like the background he provides so he can show the evolution.
Getting the QB involved is the most obvious and impactful way to provide multiplicity and variation to a running game. As far as blocking concepts to combat this Tite front, there's a nice opening in between the 4i and the OLB, perhaps have a lead blocker through there (vertical blocking like you said) and punish that C gap. Perhaps more fullback usage to help bust through that first layer of defenders. Like most 5 man fronts, getting past that first layer is difficult but if you can do that, the potential for a large gain is possible. Two high safeties means there's more room to cover for that playside safety to get get downhill to help stuff the run. Whatever the adjustment is, I trust Kyle will be on it.
Great video and quality posts, thanks y'all. Learned from this for sure. Wonder if this is partly what Kyle had in mind when he mixed in more counters and gap run plays last year.

From a passing standpoint, I remember teams hitting short outside the numbers a lot against Fangio's quarters shell. Easy 7 yard comebacks with outside Wars, Ohio concepts, etc. Basically feast on the soft underneath area in Quarters or Quarters match and march down the field slowly (of course Fangio's defenses have all been excellent shutting teams down closer to the RZ). Not sure how it fits in Kyle's offensive style though, he likes the condensed sets.

The other thing which I'm sure he wants is speed and to threaten the safeties deep. Safeties will usually play 10 yards off and flat-footed, so they can be vulnerable. And then in theory, with the Tite front the DL isn't ready to tee off, unlike a 3T / wide 9 / edge rushers in 3-4 . And there's just 1 edge rusher. Unless it's a 5 man rush with 2 edges, which then opens up possibilities elsewhere.
Just reading transcripts from his presser. someone asked about the wide 0 making it easier for guys to chip Bosa b/c he so wide making himself closer to slot wr's. they can chip him and not take themselves out of the passing route b/c he's lined up so wide. Need to adjust this
  • All22
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,876
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by All22:
Watching the All22 of the Vikings-Seahawks game. The Vikings screen game is on point. Counter run seems to work but outside zone and inside zone are getting shut down.

Edit: yep, Minnesota is all counters, cutbacks, and checkdowns. Kurt is using checkdowns to the RB as the first read ala Alex Smith.

Thanks for doing that legwork. I think that's definitely one solution, counters, in other words, pulling an OL to the playside which is in essence buying another gap. Power, counters, both involve pulling an OL so that there is an additional gap to the playside that wasn't there before. Was MIN also using a fullback on their successful counter runs?
Yes, MN was using a fullback. But I don't think it's a necessity.

One thing that stood out from the SF-GB film was the outside zone handoff that Jimmy fumbled then picked up and ran up the middle for 9 yards. The play was essentially a veer or inverted veer. As the line flows to the outside the backside is wide open. If Jimmy can get 9 yards then just imagine what Trey could do.

http://smartfootball.com/run-game/what-is-the-inverted-veer-dash-read
  • All22
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,876
Originally posted by lamontb:
Just reading transcripts from his presser. someone asked about the wide 0 making it easier for guys to chip Bosa b/c he so wide making himself closer to slot wr's. they can chip him and not take themselves out of the passing route b/c he's lined up so wide. Need to adjust this

On obvious passing downs we should put in a NASCAR package with Ebukam and/or Key instead of a second DT. Then move Bosa and Ford around a bit.
Can someone explain the benefits of the wide 9 formation?

I see and read so many negatives on it I'm just wondering what the real benefit is. It gives the DEs more space to work with and somewhat of a running start, right?
what other teams currently run it?
Originally posted by NCommand:
Yup...an experienced QB instantly singles a weakness up and goes after rookies and D.Johnson 1on1. Smart.

Who was the CB Rodgers went after a couple years ago for the late win?

Mabin….and you blamed Saleh lol
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,298
Originally posted by Patoranking:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Wow, that video is awesome and super informative. I hope that dude is getting paid because it probably took him weeks, maybe months, to make that video.

Originally posted by thl408:
So let's move the discussion along. How does an outside zone scheme counter this Tite front, because that question is coming for all these offenses that have adopted the Shanahan version of outside zone. Kyle has gotten himself a QB that can allow him to play 11 v 11 in the running game. Is it trying to power through the B/C gaps with inside zone? More WR end arounds that try to capture the edge with more speed than what a RB can provide? Toss sweeps that try to avoid the "bear-like" front by out running those 3 IDL? This might belong in the Kyle thread but whatever.

It seems like quick-hitting gap concepts would be the way to. OL being able to get off the ball and get on their blocks/get vertical immediately instead of having to double and climb.

I'm not X's and O's guy, it seems like counter plays and getting the QB involved in the run game would be a massive pain in the ass for a tite front.

It really is a well done video. I like the background he provides so he can show the evolution.
Getting the QB involved is the most obvious and impactful way to provide multiplicity and variation to a running game. As far as blocking concepts to combat this Tite front, there's a nice opening in between the 4i and the OLB, perhaps have a lead blocker through there (vertical blocking like you said) and punish that C gap. Perhaps more fullback usage to help bust through that first layer of defenders. Like most 5 man fronts, getting past that first layer is difficult but if you can do that, the potential for a large gain is possible. Two high safeties means there's more room to cover for that playside safety to get get downhill to help stuff the run. Whatever the adjustment is, I trust Kyle will be on it.
Great video and quality posts, thanks y'all. Learned from this for sure. Wonder if this is partly what Kyle had in mind when he mixed in more counters and gap run plays last year.

From a passing standpoint, I remember teams hitting short outside the numbers a lot against Fangio's quarters shell. Easy 7 yard comebacks with outside Wars, Ohio concepts, etc. Basically feast on the soft underneath area in Quarters or Quarters match and march down the field slowly (of course Fangio's defenses have all been excellent shutting teams down closer to the RZ). Not sure how it fits in Kyle's offensive style though, he likes the condensed sets.

The other thing which I'm sure he wants is speed and to threaten the safeties deep. Safeties will usually play 10 yards off and flat-footed, so they can be vulnerable. And then in theory, with the Tite front the DL isn't ready to tee off, unlike a 3T / wide 9 / edge rushers in 3-4 . And there's just 1 edge rusher. Unless it's a 5 man rush with 2 edges, which then opens up possibilities elsewhere.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around "gap and a half". Brandon Staley says they are not read and react like a typical two gapping system, but how can you attack a gap while also being mindful of the other 'half a gap'? If a DT attacks a gap, and is walled off, how can he effectively defend his half gap? Some really intriguing stuff and I wonder if Fangio was having Justin Smith do this. I would not be able to tell the difference between a two gapper and a 'gap and a half' gapper.

We are all familiar with Fangio's Quarters system which was effective, but with those CBs playing with a soft cushion, it was maddening seeing the offense convert a 3rd & 5 by catching a quick Curl on the outside. But he had his reasons for doing that - mainly forcing offenses to put together 10 play drives. With there being a league wide shift towards Quarters based schemes, it is those three underneath defenders that need to be stressed, particularly those two curl/flat defenders. Run the CB off deep then attack the curl/flat defender in the passing game. Sounds right in theory.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,298
Originally posted by bmvanthiel:
Can someone explain the benefits of the wide 9 formation?

I see and read so many negatives on it I'm just wondering what the real benefit is. It gives the DEs more space to work with and somewhat of a running start, right?
what other teams currently run it?

It's a front that tries to put the DEs in the best position to rush the passer while sacrificing interior run defense. I think that's the best way to put it. Heroism mentioned that Saleh has taken it with him to NYJ. Jim Schwartz is currently a coach for the Titans and he seems to take the wide9 wherever he goes, not sure though.
Originally posted by titan:
Not sure what he can do to improve the pass rush. I think that's the only real way we can help our DB's.

It's more the other way around. Our DB's have to figure out a way to help our pass rush.
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by titan:
Not sure what he can do to improve the pass rush. I think that's the only real way we can help our DB's.

It's more the other way around. Our DB's have to figure out a way to help our pass rush.

not when one starter is a rookie and other guy is awful (DJ). they have to dominate and play up to the standards they set.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone