Originally posted by Joecool:
I think Sing's leadership comments mentioned by the commentating crew tells me he doesn't think too hard in whether he feels compelled to put Alex back in the game.
I think Alex should start but be benched if he plays like his normal self and has 3 quarters worth of droughts.
The thing is, Alex rarely gives a coach a good reason to bench him. Here is why...
If a defender is running at Alex Smith unblocked, Smith will most likely sprint in the opposite direction away from the defender and then throw the ball out of bounds. Was it Alex Smith's "fault"? Not really. Because there was a defender coming unblocked, so how can you blame the quarterback? Naturally, the line is blamed for the play.
The difference is that someone like Troy Smith would not turn around and run, but rather run at and around the incoming defender, who would now have to spend 2-3 seconds turning around, and regaining his momentum. By that time Troy Smith would have the ball out or he would have scrambled for some yards.
Another example...
Alex Smith is pressured, so he throws a hard and high (but catchable) pass at the check down receiver, the ball bounces off the receivers shoulder pads and into the arms of the defender. Was this Alex Smith's "fault"? Again, one can argue that it is the receivers fault because a receiver is "supposed" to make the play. The receiver is "supposed" to make the play, but boy wouldn't it be nice if the quarterback made a better play?
IMO, football is not a game of "mistake avoidance," it is a game of play making. So if you never make a play, but also never mess up a play, you are worse than another player who makes plays but messes up just as many.
1) You MUST make mistakes if you want to make plays.
2) You MUST make plays if you want to win in the NFL.
Therefore, mistake avoidance is a formula for losing in the NFL.
Even if Alex Smith had zero interceptions this season, it is still dangerous to think that a mistake free quarterback is the key to victory in the NFL.