I'm so juiced for this draft!
We could possibly be seeing Patrick Peterson, Robert Quinn, or Prince Amukamara in red&gold next season!!
There are 244 users in the forums
FCUK Robert Quinn
Apr 7, 2011 at 8:42 AM
- LumpiaJeff
- Veteran
- Posts: 51,506
Apr 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM
- jacklegniner
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,206
Originally posted by SF69ers:
I'm so juiced for this draft!
We could possibly be seeing Patrick Peterson, Robert Quinn, or Prince Amukamara in red&gold next season!!
Dude i completely agree. I can't wait to find out who it is. They are all studs. I just hope Arizona doesn't take any of them or Von Miller because I've grown to like them all and wouldn't want them playing against us.
Apr 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM
- binary2nd
- Member
- Posts: 1,345
Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
Apr 7, 2011 at 11:33 PM
- jacklegniner
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,206
Peterson great! Von Miller or Prince also great! but i'm not going to lie... Robert Quinn is the guy i want us to get. I just think he is going to be great. with willis for the next ten years I think they can be dynamic...
Apr 7, 2011 at 11:35 PM
- backontop
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,346
Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
Apr 8, 2011 at 12:00 AM
- binary2nd
- Member
- Posts: 1,345
Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
no, you didn't, thx for failing. Your quote is freaking right there.
[ Edited by binary2nd on Apr 8, 2011 at 12:01 AM ]
Apr 8, 2011 at 12:10 AM
- boast
- Hella Fame
- Posts: 149,505
Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
no, you didn't, thx for failing. Your quote is freaking right there.
wtf?
Apr 8, 2011 at 12:15 AM
- toeknee
- Veteran
- Posts: 54,571
Originally posted by boast:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
no, you didn't, thx for failing. Your quote is freaking right there.
wtf?
I'll play judge here.
Backontop did not indicate that his hopes were up on Peterson being there, though binary wrongly assumed.
But backontop was not clear that he meant if Peterson and Quinn are available that the obvious choice is PP. Though it could be assumed that it's what he meant since he posted it in this thread.
With that said, you're both guilty.
Apr 8, 2011 at 12:27 AM
- binary2nd
- Member
- Posts: 1,345
Originally posted by teeohh:Originally posted by boast:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
no, you didn't, thx for failing. Your quote is freaking right there.
wtf?
I'll play judge here.
Backontop did not indicate that his hopes were up on Peterson being there, though binary wrongly assumed.
But backontop was not clear that he meant if Peterson and Quinn are available that the obvious choice is PP. Though it could be assumed that it's what he meant since he posted it in this thread.
With that said, you're both guilty.
Wrong. If he would've phrased that he "preferred" Peterson in some way, shape, or form, then you'd be on to something. However, he basically said that "Peterson needs to be the pick," nothing else. By saying that, it's safe to assume (very safe, I might add) that he is implying that he feels Peterson NEEDS to be the pick. Not only that, he even stated the # of our pick, which implies it even further..it's pretty clear, "Peterson needs to be the pick at #7." He messed up, I get it now of course, but I ain't guilty of anything. I simply replied (correctly, I might add) to a statement he made, a statement which was abrupt and ridiculous.
[ Edited by binary2nd on Apr 8, 2011 at 12:35 AM ]
Apr 8, 2011 at 2:55 AM
- 4ML
- Veteran
- Posts: 51,504
Originally posted by SF69ers:
I'm so juiced for this draft!
We could possibly be seeing Patrick Peterson, Robert Quinn, or Prince Amukamara in red&gold next season!!
This is what I love about this draft. There are 8 different guys I'll be happy with in the first round. In the past draft, that's been limited to 2-3 guys.
I would go crazy if we get Peterson. Of course, I really like Quinn as well. I'm super excited as well.
Apr 8, 2011 at 3:02 AM
- Kelv
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,549
I think its all been said in this discussion but it's a good bet that either Peterson or Quinn will be there for us at 7. I'd be delighted with either, probably slightly favouring Quinn because we so desperately need an impact pass rusher.
Apr 8, 2011 at 3:17 AM
- backontop
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,346
Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by teeohh:Originally posted by boast:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by binary2nd:Originally posted by backontop:
Peterson needs to be our pick at #7
putting all your hopes into that is lame, it's a complete longshot and there are other great options.
putting all our hopes? I'm simply stating that if it were between quinn and peterson we need to go with peterson.
that's not what you said.....at all.
actually I did but thanks for playing.
no, you didn't, thx for failing. Your quote is freaking right there.
wtf?
I'll play judge here.
Backontop did not indicate that his hopes were up on Peterson being there, though binary wrongly assumed.
But backontop was not clear that he meant if Peterson and Quinn are available that the obvious choice is PP. Though it could be assumed that it's what he meant since he posted it in this thread.
With that said, you're both guilty.
Wrong. If he would've phrased that he "preferred" Peterson in some way, shape, or form, then you'd be on to something. However, he basically said that "Peterson needs to be the pick," nothing else. By saying that, it's safe to assume (very safe, I might add) that he is implying that he feels Peterson NEEDS to be the pick. Not only that, he even stated the # of our pick, which implies it even further..it's pretty clear, "Peterson needs to be the pick at #7." He messed up, I get it now of course, but I ain't guilty of anything. I simply replied (correctly, I might add) to a statement he made, a statement which was abrupt and ridiculous.
Its a thread about Robert Quinn, If I am saying that we should draft Peterson then you should be smart enough to realize that it means Peterson over Quinn.
Apr 8, 2011 at 6:39 AM
- Rsrkshn
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,450
Originally posted by jacklegniner:
Peterson great! Von Miller or Prince also great! but i'm not going to lie... Robert Quinn is the guy i want us to get. I just think he is going to be great. with willis for the next ten years I think they can be dynamic...
This.
If not a QB. Then Quinn over anyone else. (one caveat though: Figure out that brain tumor thing)
Just wanted to go on record.
Mallet at QB (if not, then Stanzi later). Miller as pass rusher (over ANY cb). Phil Taylor if we trade down.
Apr 8, 2011 at 6:41 AM
- highway49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,995
I'll get on board...There's a risk with most every pick but the "mighty Quinn" could be worth it. Need an value match up for us at the # 7 spot if he there.
Apr 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM
- KezarLivin
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,902
Originally posted by SF69ers:
I'm so juiced for this draft!
We could possibly be seeing Patrick Peterson, Robert Quinn, or Prince Amukamara in red&gold next season!!
I'm with ya, it's pretty exciting!