Originally posted by TheTruth52:
As I made great effort to Point Out.. keys would be:
1. Can the 49er underperforming pass rush get to Flacco
2. Points win games.. Ravens were excellent in Redzone Offense and Redzone Defense.. they would flex between the 20s then dominate in Redzone on Defense. Tom Brady went 0-4 in the redzone.. I did not see Kaep outdoing Brady in those situations where the field is shrunk against the Ravens Defense.
There needs to be an enquiry into that Power Outage.. Niners were down for the count and they got a magical lifeline.. 35 Minutes to go over film is a travesty when you have an opponents foot on you neck about to hammer in the last nail.
Other than that its a Rout.
Kaep is good but he ain't no Joe Flacco.
First off, the Ravens were the better team and congratulations. It disgusts me when we beat a team and a fan or a player says the better team lost, so I'm certainly not going to do the same.
Secondly, Kaep is good. And he only has 10 starts going into his first offseason as the unquestioned starter.
Third, that power outage comment is BS. That's like a team complaining about rain effecting a game or some other excuse that effects both teams equally.
Fourth, Joe Flacco is a good QB also. But he has never, ever played this good, this consistently. So idk about the Kaep isn't Joe Flacco comments because as of January 1st, Kaep probably would've been considered the better QB. Flacco is a good QB who had a great postseason and an even better Super Bowl performance. We'll see how Kaep looks with 26 starts under his belt.