Post Game Analysis (vs. Green Bay Packers)

Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:

Originally posted by GoalLineStand:

Originally posted by 190836:
So coach, why did you opt to run the ball three times before the half with 56 seconds on the clock?

Coach: I don't know, I'll have to look at the film.

man this joke is getting old

-9fA

Ya I know, but 'The Tool' apparently still said it numerous times post game today.

BTW, remember when Parcells kept referring to T.O. as 'the player'? I now refer to Sing as 'The Tool'

Originally posted by SaksV:


Nedney is done after 2 years I think...time to start grooming a replacement.

You don't groom kickers, you hire them after the draft and ask if they want a job

Originally posted by jreff22:

Originally posted by SaksV:


Nedney is done after 2 years I think...time to start grooming a replacement.

You don't groom kickers, you hire them after the draft and ask if they want a job

I needed a laugh. Thanks man.

Originally posted by matt49er:
how funny will it be if both Sea and Stl lose today and we're STILL only 1 game out with 3 divisional games left? this s**t is bizaar.

for the game....it's on the coaches and the QB.....Troy is a solid #2 QB and that's it....his accuracy killed us several times today, even on VD's big drop down the field the timing and placement were way off.

we replace Singetary/Mike Johnson/Greg Manusky and add a QB only and we're a 9-7 playoff team at worst probably a 10-6 team

if we do that AND add a RG/CB (or 2) and we're in the hunt in the NFC

we do all that AND add a big time passrusher, a home run threat either at RB or WR with blazing speed, and our young OL come together (which i believe will happen) this team would be a SB contender

I still have hope, our young core players are mostly signed long term (VD, Willis, Crabtree, Gore, Staley, Iupati, J.Smith, Clements, Spencer, A.Lee) and some players with potential (A.Davis, A.Brooks, T.Brown, T.Mays, N.Bowman, J.Morgan,RJF) some players we should be able to re-sign (D.Baas, T.Spikes, B.Westbrook)

this team should be attractive for a coach especially an offensive minded coach, comeon a great RB in Gore, the best 1-2 punch at TE with VD/Walker, Crabtree, a young OL with lots of potential. A young D that needs a couple upgrades and agressive coaching.

if i were Gruden/Harbaugh/Belicheck/Holmgren I'd be foaming at the mouth to coach this team.

You must be in sales or marketing... that actually made me feel better

-Singletary said he at no point considered taking Troy Smith out of the game. "He made enough plays for me to keep him in," Singletary said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ninerinsider/detail?entry_id=78417#ixzz17HNZqJ6E


Really 10 of 25 for 197 yards 1Td and 1 Int. Not to mention the fact he held on to the ball all day long.

Originally posted by jreff22:

Originally posted by SaksV:


Nedney is done after 2 years I think...time to start grooming a replacement.

You don't groom kickers, you hire them after the draft and ask if they want a job

LOL! You're absolutely right. That's actually true indeed. LOL My bad.

[ Edited by SaksV on Dec 5, 2010 at 14:39:44 ]

Third Down Efficiency 3/12 - 25% Third Down Efficiency 9/15 - 60%
Niner Packers

Enough said

Originally posted by DownInTheCity:

Originally posted by matt49er:
how funny will it be if both Sea and Stl lose today and we're STILL only 1 game out with 3 divisional games left? this s**t is bizaar.

for the game....it's on the coaches and the QB.....Troy is a solid #2 QB and that's it....his accuracy killed us several times today, even on VD's big drop down the field the timing and placement were way off.

we replace Singetary/Mike Johnson/Greg Manusky and add a QB only and we're a 9-7 playoff team at worst probably a 10-6 team

if we do that AND add a RG/CB (or 2) and we're in the hunt in the NFC

we do all that AND add a big time passrusher, a home run threat either at RB or WR with blazing speed, and our young OL come together (which i believe will happen) this team would be a SB contender

I still have hope, our young core players are mostly signed long term (VD, Willis, Crabtree, Gore, Staley, Iupati, J.Smith, Clements, Spencer, A.Lee) and some players with potential (A.Davis, A.Brooks, T.Brown, T.Mays, N.Bowman, J.Morgan,RJF) some players we should be able to re-sign (D.Baas, T.Spikes, B.Westbrook)

this team should be attractive for a coach especially an offensive minded coach, comeon a great RB in Gore, the best 1-2 punch at TE with VD/Walker, Crabtree, a young OL with lots of potential. A young D that needs a couple upgrades and agressive coaching.

if i were Gruden/Harbaugh/Belicheck/Holmgren I'd be foaming at the mouth to coach this team.

You must be in sales or marketing... that actually made me feel better

Well said... I mentioned early that on the CBS post game show Bill Cowher said that the 9ers have a lot of talent on the team (yes, he actually said that)

It would be great if Cowher is actually interested in coaching our team!

Originally posted by SanFranAddic:

Originally posted by Gore_21:
...we are an UNprofessional team who has mastered the Art of how to bring short cleats to a piece of s**t Lambeau field.

Don't you mean 'UN-professional'?

Fixed....aaaaand fixed.

[ Edited by SaksV on Dec 5, 2010 at 14:44:54 ]

Originally posted by leakyfausett:
-Singletary said he at no point considered taking Troy Smith out of the game. "He made enough plays for me to keep him in," Singletary said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/ninerinsider/detail?entry_id=78417#ixzz17HNZqJ6E


Really 10 of 25 for 197 yards 1Td and 1 Int. Not to mention the fact he held on to the ball all day long.

YET, he runs around crazy out there on the field looking like Nate davis did. Sing said nate wasn't ready, yet troy is??

I'm sure there's discussion of this elsewhere, but is it time to jump out of the 3-4 and go back to a 4-3 next year? What advantage is left in running this system? Since so many teams are running it the draft day advantage is dwindling and constantly drafting "tweeners" and hoping they turn out has not done well for us. Our pass rush has never been that great with the 3-4 and the team is yet to really hit on a a 3-4 pass rusher.

Many talk about how a 4-3 would better utilize Willis. I remember Marshall Faulk talking about it on NFL-N not so long ago. And our NT Franklin has been mediocre at best and will be a FA. Spikes only has a year or two left inside. Bowman may be better suited on the outside.

Haralson is probably a better play as DE, same with Brooks. Lawson, if he stays would have no problem converting to a 4-3 OLB.

I look at teams that consistently get great pass rush, Phi, NYG, Ten and they run with a smaller 4-3 line. To me, if you don't have stud pass rusher I don't see any big advantage running the 3-4.

Third Down Efficiency 3/12 - 25% Third Down Efficiency 9/15 - 60%
Niner Packers

Enough said
Red Zone Efficiency 0/2 - 0% Red Zone Efficiency 2/5 - 40%
Goal To Go Efficiency 0/2 - 0% Goal To Go Efficiency 2/3 - 66%

This too.

Originally posted by RKab:
I'm sure there's discussion of this elsewhere, but is it time to jump out of the 3-4 and go back to a 4-3 next year? What advantage is left in running this system? Since so many teams are running it the draft day advantage is dwindling and constantly drafting "tweeners" and hoping they turn out has not done well for us. Our pass rush has never been that great with the 3-4 and the team is yet to really hit on a a 3-4 pass rusher.

Many talk about how a 4-3 would better utilize Willis. I remember Marshall Faulk talking about it on NFL-N not so long ago. And our NT Franklin has been mediocre at best and will be a FA. Spikes only has a year or two left inside. Bowman may be better suited on the outside.

Haralson is probably a better play as DE, same with Brooks. Lawson, if he stays would have no problem converting to a 4-3 OLB.

I look at teams that consistently get great pass rush, Phi, NYG, Ten and they run with a smaller 4-3 line. To me, if you don't have stud pass rusher I don't see any big advantage running the 3-4.

I see what you're saying but how do you explain the number 1 ranked Chargers defense, the Steelers D and the Packers I believe have the NFL Leader in sacks.

Originally posted by RKab:
I'm sure there's discussion of this elsewhere, but is it time to jump out of the 3-4 and go back to a 4-3 next year? What advantage is left in running this system? Since so many teams are running it the draft day advantage is dwindling and constantly drafting "tweeners" and hoping they turn out has not done well for us. Our pass rush has never been that great with the 3-4 and the team is yet to really hit on a a 3-4 pass rusher.

Many talk about how a 4-3 would better utilize Willis. I remember Marshall Faulk talking about it on NFL-N not so long ago. And our NT Franklin has been mediocre at best and will be a FA. Spikes only has a year or two left inside. Bowman may be better suited on the outside.

Haralson is probably a better play as DE, same with Brooks. Lawson, if he stays would have no problem converting to a 4-3 OLB.

I look at teams that consistently get great pass rush, Phi, NYG, Ten and they run with a smaller 4-3 line. To me, if you don't have stud pass rusher I don't see any big advantage running the 3-4.

Whatever the new coach wants :)

Originally posted by GoalLineStand:

Originally posted by 190836:

Originally posted by GoalLineStand:

Originally posted by 190836:
So coach, why did you opt to run the ball three times before the half with 56 seconds on the clock?

Coach: I don't know, I'll have to look at the film.

Apparently he said it 5x in his post game.

OMG, I didn't know that. What a tool.

wow just wow