Originally posted by BrianGO:
Originally posted by Puckdaddy:
Originally posted by robniner:
Originally posted by Puckdaddy:
This is the fact that they are PURPOSELY ignoring. They view it as if football is played under the perception of "the outcome of each play MUST be ideal or the previous mistakes are the reason you lose the game" when that is false and why it is a 60 minute game. The refs are not there to win or lose a game, they are there to mediate the game.
More protection of the refs from extreme critcism and ridicule
"the human element" is the mask that they use for it.
None of this matters. If the refs don't call certain penalties in a game, the players have to notice and take advantage. That's what the Ravens did.
How can you gauge this? I mean really? If thats the case, Culliver was penalized for less severe contact (PI) then your claim holds no weight. This is all smoke and mirrors to cover the fact that the refs called a bad game especially in the 4th. Dont say the refs are "allowing them to play a certain way" when there are many instances on the contrary. And on a side note, where do you draw the line? Should they have called a sweep to Crabs side and allow our blockers to wrap their arms around the defenders dependent upon the perception that "they are allowing us to play"? You can not justify this man.
