I realise it's difficult to get unbiased feedback on a 49ers fanpage. But after seeing Brady play all these years and looking at various stats and comparing them to Joe, there is definitely an arguement to be made.
QB Rating: 92.3
4 Super Bowl wins
3 Super Bowl MVPs
8 Pro Bowls
6 All-Pro selections
2 NFL MVPs
Comeback player of the year 1986
Most Post-season career TDs: 45
QB Rating: 96.4
3 Super Bowl wins
2 Super Bowl MVPs
7 Pro Bowls
3 All-Pro selections
2 NFL MVPs
Comeback player of the year 2009
Most touchdown passes in a season: 50
The other thing which makes a strong argurment for Brady is the talent he has had around him.
Montana had Clark, Solomon and a cohesive O-line together from the start of his career, then in came Roger Craig, Tom Rathman, Jerry Rice, John Taylor and Brent Jones. A huge amount of weapons to get the ball around to. The other arguement here is "Were these players so good because they had Montana to make them great?". Joe clearly is a better runner than Tom Brady, which I think made him a better overall threat than Brady.
If you look at Brady, sure he has had Randy Moss, Wes Welker, Gronkowski and Hernandez, but these guys only came in the last 5 years of his career (where he has not won a Super Bowl). In the years where he did win his Super Bowls, his most consistent offensive weapons were... ahem...Troy Brown and Deon Branch. They were good, but not exactly Rice and Taylor. His Offensive line has also changed a bit over the various Super Bowls and in present times.
Anyway, what do you guys think?