QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

WELL, WELL, WELL

Some of us see the game on a different level.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

WELL, WELL, WELL

Some of us see the game on a different level.

Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
The way he says Purdy just works for me lol 🍀

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

Originally posted by Heroism:
I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

I keep forgetting Purdy is a rookie. Every time he takes a snap I just have total confidence he will move the chains or score. And I never had that kind of confidence in any rookie QB or rookie.

Originally posted by NCommand:

And typically every single subjective stat has an operational definition tied to it. I'd imagine the public gets the general definition of it but within a company like PFF, it's even more detailed and there are 4-5 levels of review and consensus...meaning, there is a strong attempt at objectivity and consistency.

You and I saw this with Time to Throw with PFF and NextGen. Even though each defined this differently in raw numbers, since they were consistent, we saw the same "patterns of data."

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Under the passing section it says QBrec. But it's not a QB stat but unfortunately people need to associate a team accomplishment to a single person. Same with baseball a pitcher gets credit for a win even if the batters scored 12 runs in the first inning and said pitcher gives up 9 runs in the first but if they ultimately win he gets the "win"

Did you know if the Niners win 9-0 then that's a win for only Jimmy?

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by FunkyChicken:

Originally posted by libertyforever:

I think we want to be consistent here. If you don't like QB wins, then perhaps you should not like the number of rings a QB has to measure the QB performance either. If that is your position, maybe you can make a valid and solid argument that Dan Marino was better than Joe Montana.

QB wins and team success/ SB wins is often the reason Tom Brady is cited as 'The Goat' along with his crazy longevity.

But that is the point. For all of us Niners fans, if you think Joe Montana was GOAT (at least before Brady took the title), do you think QB wins and Rings are BS?

was Montana the caboose of those 9er teams .. no one has to bring up W/L for Montana.. you only bring up W/L when you have to prop someone up

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NCommand:
And typically every single subjective stat has an operational definition tied to it. I'd imagine the public gets the general definition of it but within a company like PFF, it's even more detailed and there are 4-5 levels of review and consensus...meaning, there is a strong attempt at objectivity and consistency.

You and I saw this with Time to Throw with PFF and NextGen. Even though each defined this differently in raw numbers, since they were consistent, we saw the same "patterns of data."

I would be shocked if it was more than a single employee or intern who made the determination for each throw.

Each position has its own grading rubric so our analysts know how to put a grade on the various expectations for a quarterback on a 10-yard pass beyond the sticks or what the range of grades might look like for a frontside offensive tackle down blocking on a "power" play

WHO IS DOING THE GRADING?
PFF employs over 600 full or part-time analysts, but less than 10% of analysts are trained to the level that they can grade plays. Only the top two to three percent of analysts are on the team of "senior analysts" in charge of finalizing each grade after review. Our graders have been training for months, and sometimes years, in order to learn, understand and show mastery of our process that includes our 300-page training manual and video playbook. We have analysts from all walks of life, including former players, coaches and scouts. We don't care if you played.

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by Heroism:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Brought to you by the Leprechaun!

I pointed out that Purdy was throwing no-look passes from the very first game against Miami, and a few posters on here acted like I was seeing things.

But this kid is incredible. He's not your typical rookie QB.

i think hes the real deal, i just dont know how high his ceiling is

that game we are all waiting for, where he implodes for 3-4 picks i dont think is going to happen

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Under the passing section it says QBrec. But it's not a QB stat but unfortunately people need to associate a team accomplishment to a single person. Same with baseball a pitcher gets credit for a win even if the batters scored 12 runs in the first inning and said pitcher gives up 9 runs in the first but if they ultimately win he gets the "win"

Did you know if the Niners win 9-0 then that's a win for only Jimmy?

LOL, has anyone ever said such a thing?