Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Then those GMs are dumb, because the team scored ten more points a game with him than they did with Jimmy. Sometimes scouts are just wrong. It happens frequently. Every single year everyone misses on at least one QB. Because what makes a great QB outside of arm talent so far has not been quantized very well (these new cognitive tests maybe changing that).
Dude it's 7 games. You're talking about giving up 1st rd picks for that. GMs aren't gonna magically change all their scouting on how they evaluated a guy over that…I think Brock is for sure better than where he went. Do I think he's a multiple 1st rd QB worth trading for? No. Not yet.
People have really taken sides for zero reason other than human tribalism as usual. For the same reason I wanted Jimmy gone (saw multiple seasons of mediocrity) is why I can't bash or glorify Purdy or Lance. We need more data. I just hope Purdy comes back 100% because he looked fantastic.
if I had to guess he missed the first few games. With this team it should t be a season killer.
There is a third camp. You can join us if you want. It's the "No matter what happens we're going to have a good QB camp." If neither Trey or Sam steps up, well, we still have Brock. If either Trey or Sam become the guy, then they have dramatically improved and we're set at QB. It's the win-win camp.
Oh we agree. Which is why i say they aren't trading anyone. Darnold is an easy flyer. Imo they know they are solid with Brock and Trey. Darnold is just a bonus. Any trade would need to blow your socks off type and that isn't happening.