Originally posted by jreff22:
Actually Tannehill has been playing behind a crappier OL.
This is the thing with Gabbert, just to get it out of the way. He will scan the field more. He will throw to a RB. He wont launch a ball at 200Mph at a player 8 yards away. He isn't taking a bunch of stupid sacks. He's not locking onto 1 guy and forcing the issue. And he's a much cheaper option.
If we are staying objective here...
He's played with the backups to the backups at RB. Never had a chance to work with VD. Is starting for the first time in a long time. Playing in a new-ish system. So I don't expect him to be launching balls all over the place. I don't have a problem with check-downs, didn't have a problem when Alex did it either. Many of those passes the WR/TE was just a yard or two short of the sticks...that's not a QB error IMO. Additionally how many of the other WR's were open? We all know the lack of talent and the stupid play-calling. If its a sack or throw away (Kap) or a dump off (Gabbert) I will take the dump off and hope the WR/TE/RB can shake a tackle.
He played equal if not better compared to Kap, makes less cash, didn't have any real run support, and is just getting back into playing. For all of that, I think he did well considering the situation. For a spot player/backup/bridge QB at his salary...yes it makes sense and I prefer that.
Those back up RBs, especially Harris who has a higher average then Hyde, have filled in well.
Announcers in the very last game pointed out the Gabbert was taking the check down far too quick without scanning deeper.
In the very last game I remember more then once where he throw a short pass with way too much heat.
He has taken a bunch of stupid sacks and has ran out of bounds short of the scrimmage far too often.
I'd say deferring to a check down before letting anything else develop is locking on to one guy.
Saying he never got to work with VD is moot. VD was more of a detriment to both teams he played with this year then an asset.
Isn't not starting in some time a good reason to go out and try to make big plays? You got nothing to lose at the point if you're already a back up. Why not go out and try to impress to cement a starting position.
I don't have a problem with checkdowns either when they're used when needed, not as a first option. If Kap gets the 1 read and run label, Blaine is a 1 read and check down QB.
As to your point at being a spot starter/backup I have no issue with that. I'm just hoping he's not the starter next year by default. I hope there's an actual QB competition this year in the off-season unlike the past where it's been Kap and late round pickups/career back up back ups.