Originally posted by SteveYoung:
Sorry to break it to you but he won't be tops in the NFL at at stopping the run weighting 270 pounds. The NFL is a whole other animal. Dudes with long arms are going to get their hands on him before he does. Those 33" arms are doing him no favors.
His ideal spot is LDE and Deforest has that on lock down. I could see us MOVING Deforest to UT and playing Thomas at LDE but then again I worry that tackles with length will smother him. Imagine Trent Brown and his arms blocking Thomas.
Seattle's UT is Jarran Reed and he is 6'3' 310. Just saying.
Justin smith was pretty f**king good at stopping the run and he was smaller than Solomon coming out of the draft...Solomon was doing stuff like this all yr
http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/nfl-draft/187561-solomon/page59/ post# 878
You bring up Jarran Reed and arm length when his arms are .375 inches longer (under 34 inches) He didn't even bench at the combine while Solomon busted out 30 reps good for 4th overall among
all DL prospects. He benched more than Caleb Brantley, Montravius Adams, and Malik McDowell who are all looked at as top DTs.
I've posted this a couple times about the UT (or 3-tech) and how important it is in a 4-3 under
http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2013/9/13/4727200/the-4-3-under-defining-the-defense
"This is the defense's namesake. He lines up at the 3-tech on the weak-side.
The Under Tackle (UT) is an undersized DT who gets by on speed, quickness and technique. Sheer girth is not very important for this position, atypical for an interior line position. A lot of UTs are former DE's who have shifted inside. Now, not all UT's are the small, quick type. It depends on what the defensive coordinator wants for the situation and position.
If the defense is focused on stopping the run, oftentimes the UT will be a larger defender. He could be similar to a 3-4 DE. There is versatility in how this position could be used. The first star UT was Hall of Famer Warren Sapp. Sapp is an anomaly, a player with great size and strength in addition to quickness.
Typically, a DC wants his best interior pass rusher at the UT. Because he will be in a lot of one-on-one situations against a guard, the UT should be able to knife his way into the backfield and fluster the QB in addition to penetrating on run plays.
One of the main ideas of the 4-3 Under is to get defenders in one-on-one situations. Take a look again at the 4-3 Under on the chalkboard. How does a team (from 21 personnel, or even 12) double team anyone other than the NT? While the defense is predicated on getting one-on-one matchups, it is specifically designed to get the UT and the WDE into one-on-one situations.
When running a 4-3 Under, it is very, very, very important that the 3-tech UT is able to beat solo blocks consistently. More than consistently, frequently. Because the defense is so predicated on getting him those looks, it becomes almost necessary that he is able to dominate single blocks.
In case you haven't noticed: the 3-tech under tackle is one of if not the number one most important player on this entire defense. His ability to rush the passer from the interior in addition to beating his blocker in hopes to stopping runs in the backfield is what the defense if predicated on."
IMO That's exactly what Solomon can do....I feel like you haven't even watched him play when your throwing out some of the stuff your saying (he's also closer to 280 then 270).... Also who said he's gonna be going against a OTs...if he's playing the 3-tech he's gonna be blasting thru OGs. I will add he has the speed and quickness to line up on the edge if need be (IMO best suited for the interior). Length isn't everything go look at Ingam and Mack, Thomas put up similar if not better numbers to them and weighs 15+ more lbs.
It's funny one poster says 3-tech is his ideal spot and another says LDE...no one knows and is just guessing lol.