Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 576 users in the forums

Solomon Thomas--Stanford

Originally posted by genus49:
No that's not a big concern at all. The concern from people is more "what about Armstead". There's no question Thomas WILL play if we draft him. He can succeed all along the line.

He's shown to be a dominant inside rusher and he's shown some great things on the outside as well it's just his time there is limited by what Stanford has done. The kid has all the tools to shine outside or inside. The only questions people have are weight based.

I ask again...if a 200 lb guy can bench 500 lbs but a 300 lb guy can only lift 400 lbs, who's stronger? There are 300+ lb guys in this league who would get thrown around by Thomas.

Nobody arguing for Thomas transitioned anything. Pretty much every one of us has said this kid will make the team better - period. Whether it's at 5T, 3T, Leo...wherever this kid has all the qualities to help out a roster with so many issues last year.

The guys you mentioned may hit a bigger perceived need but they have way more red flags about them than Thomas does. If we draft a kid at a position of need and he goes on to under perform or just be an outright bust was that a great decision?

With a top 5 pick you should be drafting an impact player with as few red flags as possible. That's Thomas.

Or Adams.

I think I'd rather have Armstead and Adams over Thomas and Tartt with Armstead on the scrap heap.
[ Edited by SteveYoung on Mar 23, 2017 at 8:57 AM ]
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by bzborow1:
That's a big concern to have for a #2 overall selection, isn't it? Heck, Barnett would be a better fit than Thomas because he's the better pure outside pass rusher, which is what everyone on this board was saying the 49ers need. Or if perhaps Rueben Foster. Or Malik Hooker. Or Marshon Lattimore. Thomas is a good player, but it seems like a lot of people have transitioned into make the argument to fit the solution they want.

No that's not a big concern at all. The concern from people is more "what about Armstead". There's no question Thomas WILL play if we draft him. He can succeed all along the line.

He's shown to be a dominant inside rusher and he's shown some great things on the outside as well it's just his time there is limited by what Stanford has done. The kid has all the tools to shine outside or inside. The only questions people have are weight based.

I ask again...if a 200 lb guy can bench 500 lbs but a 300 lb guy can only lift 400 lbs, who's stronger? There are 300+ lb guys in this league who would get thrown around by Thomas.

Nobody arguing for Thomas transitioned anything. Pretty much every one of us has said this kid will make the team better - period. Whether it's at 5T, 3T, Leo...wherever this kid has all the qualities to help out a roster with so many issues last year.

The guys you mentioned may hit a bigger perceived need but they have way more red flags about them than Thomas does. If we draft a kid at a position of need and he goes on to under perform or just be an outright bust was that a great decision?

With a top 5 pick you should be drafting an impact player with as few red flags as possible. That's Thomas.

I think then where we vary is on the impact Thomas will have. I don't see the generational talent in him like you do, and that's the difference. In reality, if you believe Hooker is Ed Reed you'd be foolish not to draft him. Likewise, if you feel Thomas could be the next Justin Smith or Aaron Donald then you draft him. Personally, I thought Allen was a lot more effective than Thomas this season but he was flanked by Foster and Williams.

The more I look the more I'm seeing Allen, Lattimore, Hooker, Fournette or Thomas. I think Malik Hooker could be the game changer on the back end that this team needs to transition to the new 4-3 single-high look, or Lattimore pairing up with Robinson to be a terrific 1-2 combo on the outside. Another consideration would be the draft capital (and future budget requirements) of so many early DLineman but if you end up with a terrific front 7 then who cares.
[ Edited by bzborow1 on Mar 23, 2017 at 9:00 AM ]
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Drafting at 2 and 34 it should be done. Bypassing or missing out on both is going to give us the same problems since forever ago.

Except Solomon Thomas is an edge rusher. Pretty sure we've done this dance before but just because he's great as an interior rusher doesn't mean he can't play on the edge. There's a reason most people project him out there.

If he dropped 15 lbs would your opinion change? Do you want a one dimensional speed rusher? Those guys can be had later...but there's a reason for that.

JJ Watt isn't a typical "edge rusher" was Houston upset they missed out on Aldon Smith or Robert Quinn?

And saying drafting at 2 and 34 it should be done is silly. Not every draft has the same type of players. Myles Garrett would've been a perfect fit but we won another game and missed out. Thomas is the safest pick and he will help the team. Big deal he's not a speed rushing DE. We can get Jordan Willis later on, he's fast and yet he won't be nearly as good a player as Thomas.

We have a ton of holes on this team. Anyway you slice it we'll still have holes after this draft. If we take the best guys on the board we'll help the team. Thomas plays an impact position, it's not like we're drafting the top punter out there. We clearly have questions on the DL. Let's not overthink this.

We need a LEO. No matter how many people you try to convince of this Thomas is not a LEO.

One dimensional speed rushers can't just be had later. How many guys have we drafted and failed on? Tank, Eli, Lemonhead, Lynch, etc. I would rather trade down and grab Barnett because he's actually that player.

If you think a guy that just eclipsed double digit sacks over 2 years is going to be an outside rushing force good for you, I'm not buying that.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Drafting at 2 and 34 it should be done. Bypassing or missing out on both is going to give us the same problems since forever ago.

you act like there are cornstone QBs and edge rushers in every draft which just isn't true. Teams that fail are the ones that overvalue positions like QB in the draft. IF there isn't a FQB there then don't draft one in the top rounds.

If there isn't a FQB the next greatest need is a dedicated edge rusher. Since Aldon left there has been a giant void and the problem isn't going away by ignoring it and drafting mid round guys.
Originally posted by SteveYoung:
This

And we took those mid tier picks to move back up into the 1st last yr, why can't we do that again? People bring up the LEO and the huge need...you know who plays the LEO in ATL Brock Reed not Vic.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Willisfn4life:
I have to admit that I've slowly gotten on the Thomas bandwagon. The more and more you picture it, the more a vision of Buckner and Thomas developing into a dynamic duo alongside the dline makes your mouth water a bit. There's been a ton of speculation where Thomas' "tweener" abilities would fit best in this defense. I admit that my problem with young "tweeners" is kind of like Jimmy Ward. They get moved around alot and it can stall their development a bit but I look at a guy like Thomas and I have to agree with you NY, he's a great blue chip prospect, much moreso than Ward was and its hard to pass up on that talent.

I'd be curious if he was drafted what the team itself visualizes for him. Buckner is already a great fit for the 5 tech in this defense. Is Buckner moved inside more permanently​ even in base and you keep Thomas at the 5 then kick him inside similarly to Michael Bennett? Or does the team ask him to get to around 285 and try him at the three more permanently​, even in base and then kick Buckner in?

Overall it would be a good problem to have.

Exactly. DLine is a special beast as a unit. It's probably the one unit that gets subed out the most out of all the other ones. You may have some substitutions at DB but for the most part your starters will see the most snaps, QB, OL all pretty much play their starters all the time. LBers pretty much play starters though obviously get subed out in certain packages but the DL easily has the most guys coming and going whether it's linebackers coming down and rushing or the big run stoppers coming out on obvious passing downs or just guys getting breathers so in the 4th quarter they're not winded as hell.

People say drafting him is a luxury...how can anyone honestly say that given how bad we were on defense last year? Sure it was a group effort but in a 4-3 the DL is key and making assumptions that guys we had last year plus Earl Mitchell will suddenly hold down the fort and become a strong unit moving forward is the perfect way to keep sucking.

There are 0 red flags with Thomas. Only question is where he will play. I have yet to hear anyone give a good reason to be concerned with this kid.

Sure nothing is guaranteed but this kid checks off all the boxes on what makes successful NFL players. I liked him before but the article Phoenix posted about him seeking out a boxer for extra training to help his hands get faster and stronger just made me even that more excited about this kid. Showing that type of initiative and looking to grow as a player and not being complacent is a fantastic trait. It's what makes the good players into great ones.

Lots of guys are content to just be good athletes and think they can get by on that. Some go the extra mile and watch film, lift, listen to their coaches...then there's that extra group who do all that and more. It's not enough and they try to find every competitive edge to improve their game.

How do you say no to that type of player just because you're not sure where he'll play? Let the coaches figure that out. With those physical and mental attributes this kid will succeed wherever he plays on the line.

If people can't think of a legit reason to be concerned about this kid's NFL potential then don't overthink this just because we took Armstead and Buckner back to back.


Yeah, in laymen's terms, I don't think there is any question where these players are best suited for and Thomas is a perfect fit for the 3T (yes, he'll pack on some pounds and strength to become more stout there over the years and play closer to 290-300).

LDE/5T = Stout run defender, can help seal the edge first and foremost, funnel, TFL and modest QB pressures/sacks (Buckner)
NT/1T = Your 3-4 classic NT like Dorsey, Sopoaga, Carter, Wilfork, B. & I.Williams, etc. (Mitchell)
RDT/3T = Your best interior pass rusher who's also stout against the run (Thomas)
LEO = Your best speed edge rusher; he lines up out wide often like Garrett, Miller, Aldon, Ware, etc. (Vacant)

Fans are talking about sub packages. This is a base 4 down DL. That won't change, even in a sub package. The player that is usually sub'd out is the SAM for an extra DB. If anyone will be sub'd out on the DL it will be for additional pass rush like Blair/Armstead in for Mitchell or another strong pass rusher like Frank Clark for Buckner.

Sadly, with 3 first round picks and even with Thomas, we're still missing a true NT and LEO. That's the part that sucks ass. In fact, we need about 3 true edge rushers for optimal success.

Mitchell can and will play the NT/1T but he's not the wide-bodied plugger who takes up two every down and is impossible to run on (hence why we went after Brandon Williams). And Lynch will start out at LEO most likely b/c he's our best pas rusher but he's no LEO. We're going to have to find some real edge rushers this draft and make it a priority.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
We traded our 2nd 4th and 6t last yr to move back up into the 1st last yr

Dude I don't care what you think we "need" at 3-tech and what Seattle player compares to what player in the draft...we aren't Seattle nor do we have to be. It's all about talent level at the top and Thomas is regarded as the 2nd best player in the draft by most. I'll take a Bennett/Campbell combo with Thomas/buck...I provided a article about the 4-3 under explaining how important the 3-tech is...Phoenix provided an article stating how Bennett lined up all over the place this past season including the LEO...why can't Eli play SAM? Why can't lynch work the LEO? Like you said we aren't gonna get everything in one draft and will have $70+ million in cap space next off season as well.
Moving from 37 to 28 is not that big of a deal. It costs next to nothing because really you're jumping in for a desired player in our case a guard. Maybe it can get us a good late 1st rounder. Maybe not.

I didn't say anything about Seattle there. That's showing you we're not that far off on the interior front. 1 solid run stuffer that can be had in the 3rd or 4th. The glaring weakness is at the ends and you can have Bennett and Campbell but without De's, CB's S's you're still going to suck.
Originally posted by jreff22:
We need a LEO. No matter how many people you try to convince of this Thomas is not a LEO.

One dimensional speed rushers can't just be had later. How many guys have we drafted and failed on? Tank, Eli, Lemonhead, Lynch, etc. I would rather trade down and grab Barnett because he's actually that player.

If you think a guy that just eclipsed double digit sacks over 2 years is going to be an outside rushing force good for you, I'm not buying that.

Good god the LEO we need a LEO ahhhh! Lol the most used word of the off season...Brock Reed is the LEO in ATL a 2nd rd pick, Avril is the main LEO in Seattle a 3rd rd pick...Bennett actually played LEO at certain pts last yr as well...if Solomon isn't a edge rusher why does mike mayock have him as the 2nd overall edge rusher only behind Myles?
Originally posted by FL9er:
I hate using hyperbole, but if you add Thomas and he and Buckner realize their full potential, it'd be like having Michael Bennett and Calais Campbell in your rotation.

Who wouldn't take that?

Thomas is no Michael Bennett. That's a terrible comparison. He is more like our own, Bryant Young.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by jreff22:
We need a LEO. No matter how many people you try to convince of this Thomas is not a LEO.

One dimensional speed rushers can't just be had later. How many guys have we drafted and failed on? Tank, Eli, Lemonhead, Lynch, etc. I would rather trade down and grab Barnett because he's actually that player.

If you think a guy that just eclipsed double digit sacks over 2 years is going to be an outside rushing force good for you, I'm not buying that.

Good god the LEO we need a LEO ahhhh! Lol the most used word of the off season...Brock Reed is the LEO in ATL a 2nd rd pick, Avril is the main LEO in Seattle a 3rd rd pick...Bennett actually played LEO at certain pts last yr as well...if Solomon isn't a edge rusher why does mike mayock have him as the 2nd overall edge rusher only behind Myles?

He's so irrelevant you don't even know his name, lol. It's Brooks Reed not Brock.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by jreff22:
We need a LEO. No matter how many people you try to convince of this Thomas is not a LEO.

One dimensional speed rushers can't just be had later. How many guys have we drafted and failed on? Tank, Eli, Lemonhead, Lynch, etc. I would rather trade down and grab Barnett because he's actually that player.

If you think a guy that just eclipsed double digit sacks over 2 years is going to be an outside rushing force good for you, I'm not buying that.

Good god the LEO we need a LEO ahhhh! Lol the most used word of the off season...Brock Reed is the LEO in ATL a 2nd rd pick, Avril is the main LEO in Seattle a 3rd rd pick...Bennett actually played LEO at certain pts last yr as well...if Solomon isn't a edge rusher why does mike mayock have him as the 2nd overall edge rusher only behind Myles?

From Mayock

Solomon Thomas from Stanford. Kid can play outside on run down, inside on pass downs.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
just looking at CBS draft big board and this is who's reported to be there right around 34...

Takkarist McKinley-34th overall prospect
Charles Harris-32nd
Tim Williams-38th
T.J. Watt-41st
Tyus Bowser-67th
Jordan Willis-72nd
Derek Rivers-82nd
Ryan Anderson-92nd
Devonte Fields-150

I'll gladly give up a 4th and 6th (what we gave up last yr to move up) to move up and grab McKinley/Harris/Williams

NY, of this list, who do you think has the best shot at being our LEO?
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by FL9er:
I hate using hyperbole, but if you add Thomas and he and Buckner realize their full potential, it'd be like having Michael Bennett and Calais Campbell in your rotation.

Who wouldn't take that?

Thomas is no Michael Bennett. That's a terrible comparison. He is more like our own, Bryant Young.

What makes it a terrible comp?
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Moving from 37 to 28 is not that big of a deal. It costs next to nothing because really you're jumping in for a desired player in our case a guard. Maybe it can get us a good late 1st rounder. Maybe not.

I didn't say anything about Seattle there. That's showing you we're not that far off on the interior front. 1 solid run stuffer that can be had in the 3rd or 4th. The glaring weakness is at the ends and you can have Bennett and Campbell but without De's, CB's S's you're still going to suck.

Dude all you've been doing is comparing players to Seattle/jag players and that's how we have to do it. How many times have you thrown out the name Avril and McDaniel?

CBs big Board has these edge rushers ranked right around where we are picking at 34.

Takkarist McKinley-34th overall prospect
Charles Harris-32nd
Tim Williams-38th
T.J. Watt-41st
Tyus Bowser-67th
Jordan Willis-72nd
Derek Rivers-82nd
Ryan Anderson-92nd
Devonte Fields-150

drafting a OG has nothing to with trade comp, they don't know who we're drafting....I have zero peoblem moving up for one of the edge rushers or waiting for one to be there.
Originally posted by genus49:
Except Solomon Thomas is an edge rusher. Pretty sure we've done this dance before but just because he's great as an interior rusher doesn't mean he can't play on the edge.

But I love you, man!
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone