[ Edited by Shorteous on Apr 25, 2009 at 8:41 AM ]
There are 522 users in the forums
MadDog's Final 256 Board
Apr 25, 2009 at 8:32 AM
- Shorteous
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,299
just looking over our possible pick ups, if we were able grab those players I think I would have a very hard time waiting for the season to start in september. Thanks MD
Apr 25, 2009 at 8:42 AM
- 7square
- Veteran
- Posts: 9
Super useful -- thanks! (Though I hope you're wrong about Crabtree.)
In the minor technical error department: Jamon Meredith
In the minor technical error department: Jamon Meredith
Apr 25, 2009 at 8:55 AM
- ChaunceyGardner
- Q46 Draft Winner
- Posts: 23,761
Interesting board this year, the top is so fluid it is pretty exciting actually.
How do you grade your top 256? Do you just do +/- of how far each pick actually occurs from the projected spot, add up the total variance then divide by 256?
How do you grade your top 256? Do you just do +/- of how far each pick actually occurs from the projected spot, add up the total variance then divide by 256?
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:17 AM
- MadDog49er
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 19,400
Originally posted by ChaunceyGardner:
Interesting board this year, the top is so fluid it is pretty exciting actually.
How do you grade your top 256? Do you just do +/- of how far each pick actually occurs from the projected spot, add up the total variance then divide by 256?
I create the board based on where I think the general area where the player will fall.
For instance, if two teams are looking for a RB in the third round, and they are drafting in the 70th and 76th slot, I have a tendency to split the pick down the middle, and project the player to go 73rd overall.
I don't grade the players on this board, since that is a completely different animal. For instance, I believe that Phil Loadholt is the twelfth best OT in this draft, but he'll probably be the 7th OT drafted overall.
There are a number of solid publications that put up a value board, where they believe a player will be drafted. Some boards are different than others. Some overvalue and some undervalue. Three examples: For some time now, three prospects had been sitting on NFL Draft Scout.com's late round draft projection: Devin Moore, Mike Wallace and Bradley Fletcher. Based on their college performances, measurables, and off-season workouts, I had all three players slotted into the 3rd round months ago. In recent weeks, NFL Draft Scout.com has moved Bradley Fletcher from the 7th to the 3rd round; Mike Wallace from 7th to a 3rd-4th; and they still have Devin Moore as a 6th-7th rounder. I have Moore as a 4th rounder.
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,216
Looks like NYJ have a deal in place with the JAGS that if Sanchez or Crabtree is there at #8 they'll swap. So it looks like Orakpo is the next best.
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:28 AM
- GhostofFredDean74
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 30,082
As always, great stuff MD!!!!
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:30 AM
- TonyStarks
- Veteran
- Posts: 62,725
You think the raiders will pass up on Crabtree?
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:32 AM
- 49ERGLENN
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,567
It works for me, I am just concerned about Crabtree's DIVA attitude and some Pro Personnel people are saying he has? I hope the Coaches know something we don't if he's the pick? But good job as always!
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:35 AM
- TheHitman
- Info N/A
Good luck with the draft, bro. You've put in a lot of work.
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM
- Paul_Hofer
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,052
Maddog,
You kept Maybin at about where other mocks have him, but not so Everette Brown down to #37. What are you seeing in Brown to drop him about 20 spots?
You kept Maybin at about where other mocks have him, but not so Everette Brown down to #37. What are you seeing in Brown to drop him about 20 spots?
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM
- Firenze
- Veteran
- Posts: 5
Thanks as usual. I check this bord during the two days. I'm wait for your opinion after the first day. But, seriously, do you think Cratrbee will fall to #10? Why?
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM
- MadDog49er
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 19,400
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
You think the raiders will pass up on Crabtree?
I know it goes against logic, but Al Davis loves speed, and that is not Crabtree's forte. Michael Lombardi of the NFL Draft Post, who worked with Davis for years, does not believe Davis would draft a guy without a timed speed. Crab does not have a timed 40 due to his injury.
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:53 AM
- TonyStarks
- Veteran
- Posts: 62,725
Originally posted by MadDog49er:Originally posted by TonyStarks:
You think the raiders will pass up on Crabtree?
I know it goes against logic, but Al Davis loves speed, and that is not Crabtree's forte. Michael Lombardi of the NFL Draft Post, who worked with Davis for years, does not believe Davis would draft a guy without a timed speed. Crab does not have a timed 40 due to his injury.
Apr 25, 2009 at 9:55 AM
- MadDog49er
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 19,400
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Maddog,
You kept Maybin at about where other mocks have him, but not so Everette Brown down to #37. What are you seeing in Brown to drop him about 20 spots?
Brown is seen by most to be a one-dimensional player, simply an edge rusher. On top of that, he's less than 6'2", which is a killer for DE's who do not have blinding speed.
Does this mean he will not be a productive pro player? No. But, as a first rounder, I think people will pass.