There are 70 users in the forums
Originally posted by zeppfan1:
Gore doesn't have quite the receiving numbers but catches the ball extremely well. Craig always played on very good teams and was a star at that. Gore has had to endure some poor coaching, players, etc. but has still put up very good numbers. I am really enjoying watching him, his heart, passion, and leadership are unquestioned. I would put Gore ahead of Craig, but only by a little at this point. This is coming from a guy who loved and watched Craig in his tenure with the Niners. It's a good debate because both players were/are classy and beloved 49ers.
Good post! Can't go wrong with either guy and both would be near the top of my 9ers list...though it is still too difficult for me even to consider making one!
Originally posted by WeAreLegend:
The fact this question is being asked tells me some fans need to do some history work. There's been some huge talent on this team through the years.
Originally posted by WeAreLegend:
Gore could never be Roger Craig. Gore is not easily the best running back we've had. Craig never left the field no matter which all pro backs we had on the team, including Wendell Tyler and many others. Walsh would start Craig over Gore. Don't even go there. Love Gore but lets not start smoking too much dope please. Start making the list of ALL TIME NINER GREATS and I'm not sure Gore even makes the top ten at all.
Like Justin Smith said, "stats are for losers."
Originally posted by WeAreLegend:Gore could never be Roger Craig. Gore is not easily the best running back we've had. Craig never left the field no matter which all pro backs we had on the team, including Wendell Tyler and many others. Walsh would start Craig over Gore. Don't even go there. Love Gore but lets not start smoking too much dope please. Start making the list of ALL TIME NINER GREATS and I'm not sure Gore even makes the top ten at all.
Like Justin Smith said, "stats are for losers."
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by WeAreLegend:
Gore could never be Roger Craig. Gore is not easily the best running back we've had. Craig never left the field no matter which all pro backs we had on the team, including Wendell Tyler and many others. Walsh would start Craig over Gore. Don't even go there. Love Gore but lets not start smoking too much dope please. Start making the list of ALL TIME NINER GREATS and I'm not sure Gore even makes the top ten at all.
Like Justin Smith said, "stats are for losers."
This is why I put Gore slightly ahead of Craig. That's not taking anything away from Craig, he was a star in a hall of fame studded offense. Gore is the best RB in Niner history because of what he's accomplished in spite of who's around him.
Interesting opinion. I ask you this. Could Roger do what Gore has done on the miserably inept offenses that Frank has played on?
Originally posted by dugo:
Originally posted by Chrs0049:
Gore vs. Craig in their primes, who you got
Damm..I loved watching Craig run.and still don't understand why the HOF is holding back on him But can't help but wonder what Gore would of done on any of those teams..Still Craig was ahead of his time being able to catch out of the back field.. I'd go with Craig just cause different skill sets ...
Originally posted by Garcia:
Until this group wins a superbowl I dont think any of them should be in the top 10.
Originally posted by WeAreLegend:
Gore could never be Roger Craig. Gore is not easily the best running back we've had. Craig never left the field no matter which all pro backs we had on the team, including Wendell Tyler and many others. Walsh would start Craig over Gore. Don't even go there. Love Gore but lets not start smoking too much dope please. Start making the list of ALL TIME NINER GREATS and I'm not sure Gore even makes the top ten at all.
Like Justin Smith said, "stats are for losers."