Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by canadian49erfan:
Makes sense with the risk of losing Rogers/Ginn
I agree. But I also don't think this signing will have any impact on our attempt to re-sign both. Ginn is a better KR/PR and Rogers is a better CB.
Cox wasn't signed to "replace" Rogers, Culliver is his "replacement". He was signed as #3 or 4 CB to push Brock for the Nickel, he also doubles as immediate insurance against Ginn leaving, even though I still see us signing Eddie Royal or drafting another CB or WR with KR skills.
I've thought Ginn would be gone since we nearly cut him at the beginning of the season, the entire idea behind what happen was take a cut and we'll give you a shot FA a year sooner. Ginn proved his worth to some degree and I think another team especially a WR desperate team like the Jags, Skins, Bears, Bucs, Rams, etc etc will easily over pay him compared to our pre-determined value.
[ Edited by sfout on Mar 13, 2012 at 12:33 PM ]