If we go 1-7 we should let Nate Davis finish the year as the Starting QB | Page 4

pd24 · 2010-09-28T08:33:07-07:00

Might as well throw him out there for 8 real games and see what we have. If he is as good as some people think he can be, we wouldn't have to spend a 1st round pick on a QB and can adress the CB position or get a legit pass rusher. It would be better than throwing Carr or T. Smith in there. Thoughts?

Sep 28, 2010 at 10:37 AM

#46

STNiner
Veteran
Posts: 366

or Trent Edwards

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM

#47

RedAlert
Veteran
Posts: 348

If the Niners are 1-7, I think Singletary is toast. There will be a new coach next year and a new offense. I still don't know exactly what Davis did to fall so far out of favor, but it seems Davis still doesn't have the offense down. Mental issues or laziness

Just let Alex go down with the ship and prepare for the house cleaning.

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM

#48

pd24
Veteran
Posts: 9,407

Originally posted by RedAlert:
If the Niners are 1-7, I think Singletary is toast. There will be a new coach next year and a new offense. I still don't know exactly what Davis did to fall so far out of favor, but it seems Davis still doesn't have the offense down. Mental issues or laziness

Just let Alex go down with the ship and prepare for the house cleaning.

That wasn't fair to Davis when Singletary said that, because now we all know that Singletary didn't have the offense down either.

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:07 AM

#49

jta854
Veteran
Posts: 2,305

Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jreff22:
PS QB does not = Answer

We have a PS coach that alot of people thought was the answer. The PS coach is they guy that decided to cut this QB who was played as good or better than any QB that is on our roster. Sice Sing isn't a good coach and knows nothing about offense or the QB position, I don't take his decision seriously. Sing needed to put himself on the PS.

What about how the other 31 teams passed on him?

What about how we made Alex Smith the 1st player taken in the draft, and the raiders doing the same with JaMarcus Russell. What about Romo not getting drafted or the other 31 teams passing on tom Brady?

Smith and Russell have no logical connection to your comments about N. Davis discussion.

As for the Brady and Romo statement, what is your point? Some times you find a diamond in the rough, but 99 time out of 100 you just find rocks.

If you want the bet the house (rest of the season) on the chance that Davis is the next Brady, thats your opinion, but I'll pass.

That is real easy to figure out, all you have to do is read what I replied to.

So your logic is: Romo and Brady were are great late round finds, so we should give Nate a chance as the starter?

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:08 AM

#50

RedAlert
Veteran
Posts: 348

Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by RedAlert:
If the Niners are 1-7, I think Singletary is toast. There will be a new coach next year and a new offense. I still don't know exactly what Davis did to fall so far out of favor, but it seems Davis still doesn't have the offense down. Mental issues or laziness

Just let Alex go down with the ship and prepare for the house cleaning.

That wasn't fair to Davis when Singletary said that, because now we all know that Singletary didn't have the offense down either.

True

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM

#51

5timechamps
Veteran
Posts: 1,990

nate davis should not even be on the team.

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:22 AM

#52

pd24
Veteran
Posts: 9,407

Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jreff22:
PS QB does not = Answer

We have a PS coach that alot of people thought was the answer. The PS coach is they guy that decided to cut this QB who was played as good or better than any QB that is on our roster. Sice Sing isn't a good coach and knows nothing about offense or the QB position, I don't take his decision seriously. Sing needed to put himself on the PS.

What about how the other 31 teams passed on him?

What about how we made Alex Smith the 1st player taken in the draft, and the raiders doing the same with JaMarcus Russell. What about Romo not getting drafted or the other 31 teams passing on tom Brady?

Smith and Russell have no logical connection to your comments about N. Davis discussion.

As for the Brady and Romo statement, what is your point? Some times you find a diamond in the rough, but 99 time out of 100 you just find rocks.

If you want the bet the house (rest of the season) on the chance that Davis is the next Brady, thats your opinion, but I'll pass.

That is real easy to figure out, all you have to do is read what I replied to.

So your logic is: Romo and Brady were are great late round finds, so we should give Nate a chance as the starter?

He wouldn't do worse than 0-3. Also if you go through the thread I posted the stats of our 3 preseason QB's and they are all about the same, each one better in certain stats.

Sep 28, 2010 at 11:40 AM

#53

jta854
Veteran
Posts: 2,305

Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jta854:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by jreff22:
PS QB does not = Answer

We have a PS coach that alot of people thought was the answer. The PS coach is they guy that decided to cut this QB who was played as good or better than any QB that is on our roster. Sice Sing isn't a good coach and knows nothing about offense or the QB position, I don't take his decision seriously. Sing needed to put himself on the PS.

What about how the other 31 teams passed on him?

What about how we made Alex Smith the 1st player taken in the draft, and the raiders doing the same with JaMarcus Russell. What about Romo not getting drafted or the other 31 teams passing on tom Brady?

Smith and Russell have no logical connection to your comments about N. Davis discussion.

As for the Brady and Romo statement, what is your point? Some times you find a diamond in the rough, but 99 time out of 100 you just find rocks.

If you want the bet the house (rest of the season) on the chance that Davis is the next Brady, thats your opinion, but I'll pass.

That is real easy to figure out, all you have to do is read what I replied to.

So your logic is: Romo and Brady were are great late round finds, so we should give Nate a chance as the starter?

He wouldn't do worse than 0-3. Also if you go through the thread I posted the stats of our 3 preseason QB's and they are all about the same, each one better in certain stats.

You are right about the 03 part, but The New Orleans game could have been a lot worse. As far as preseason stats, I don't think you can read to much into those.

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM

#54

Nes49
Veteran
Posts: 6,105

I don't even wanna consider the possiblity of that record.

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:32 PM

#55

DarthNiner
Veteran
Posts: 8,625

BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:35 PM

#56

SanDiego49er
Veteran
Posts: 52,336

Originally posted by DarthNiner:
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM

#57

pd24
Veteran
Posts: 9,407

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by DarthNiner:
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

are we laughing at 0-3? Alex Smith? Or that we have a real shot at being 1-7 or 0-8?

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:38 PM

#58

190836
Veteran
Posts: 11,971

Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by DarthNiner:
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

are we laughing at 0-3? Alex Smith? Or that we have a real shot at being 1-7 or 0-8?

All of the above!!

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM

#59

darkknight49
Veteran
Posts: 10,878

Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by DarthNiner:
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

are we laughing at 0-3? Alex Smith? Or that we have a real shot at being 1-7 or 0-8?

Playing Nate Davis, I presume.

Sep 28, 2010 at 1:45 PM

#60

pd24
Veteran
Posts: 9,407

Originally posted by darkknight49:
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by DarthNiner:
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

are we laughing at 0-3? Alex Smith? Or that we have a real shot at being 1-7 or 0-8?

Playing Nate Davis, I presume.

I don't see how it is funny, when ther isn't a clear cut better option at QB.