There are 87 users in the forums
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Post on Google+
- Post on LinkedIn
- Post on Digg
- Post on Delicious
- Post on StumbleUpon
- Post on Reddit
- Post on Tumblr
IF IT COMES DOWN TO IT, WOULD YOU SHARE THE NEW STADIUM W/ THE RAIDERS ?
IF IT COMES DOWN TO IT, WOULD YOU SHARE THE NEW STADIUM W/ THE RAIDERS ?
Dec 13, 2012 at 13:49:16
#316
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,505
Dec 13, 2012 at 13:51:52
#317
- SportsFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,564
And you just know Raider fans would tag their seats with a bunch of Raider crap. No way am I paying 4k per seat to sit in something with Raiders written all over it.
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:04:34
#318
- Wrathman
- Member
- Posts: 867
I wouldn't even share a bag of Doritos with them!
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:05:35
#319
- JerryRice1848
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,680
Originally posted by Wrathman:
I wouldn't even share a bag of Doritos with them!
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:19:35
#320
- jimmythegreekjr
- Veteran
- Posts: 932
I wouldn't mind sharing on the following condition:
They change their city and team name...
They change their city and team name...
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:26:45
#321
- ChazBoner
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,448
Originally posted by JerryRice1848:
Originally posted by Wrathman:
I wouldn't even share a bag of Doritos with them!
ugh, wtf! why they always taking our greats! Rice, Craig, Rathman, Lott, who else??
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:28:52
#322
- NinerGod
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,617
Lol at all the people saying no. Like you'll have a choice.
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:30:25
#323
- wysiwyg
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,117
Still no
Not with those magpies
Not with those magpies
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:36:51
#324
- VA49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,035
The question is better put to the people who invested in the stadium. I think their answer would be a unanimous. YES.
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:43:35
#325
- JD9671
- Veteran
- Posts: 593
F**K NO !
Dec 13, 2012 at 14:48:03
#326
- 76Razor
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,503
I'm sure someone brought this up already, but i heard that this new stadium is already built with TWO HOME TEAM locker rooms. Sounds like the niners were preparing for this already.
my vote is yes. that is a HUGE loan that will need to be paid off. what better way to do that then double your sales. 20 home games. that money in the bank. when football season is over, you host other events as well. make it into a money making machine-just pac bell/at&t does it.
the only thing that suffers is maybe the aesthetics of the place. you would need both niner and raider statues and other permanent fixtures coexisting. and you know some a*****e raider fan would deface the inner s**t. the is the part that makes me say no.
my vote is yes. that is a HUGE loan that will need to be paid off. what better way to do that then double your sales. 20 home games. that money in the bank. when football season is over, you host other events as well. make it into a money making machine-just pac bell/at&t does it.
the only thing that suffers is maybe the aesthetics of the place. you would need both niner and raider statues and other permanent fixtures coexisting. and you know some a*****e raider fan would deface the inner s**t. the is the part that makes me say no.
Dec 13, 2012 at 15:12:41
#327
- fryet
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,486
It would financially help the 49ers, so I voted yes. Ideally the raiders would also split the PSL cost with 49er fans. More likely it would just double the PSL income of the stadium, and that money could be saved up for 2050 when they want to build another stadium.
Dec 13, 2012 at 15:27:47
#328
- echav4949
- Veteran
- Posts: 123
I say hell no!!!
Dec 13, 2012 at 15:43:56
#329
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,855
Dec 13, 2012 at 15:53:40
#330
- SFrush
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,564
Nope. They didn't contribute squat to help us build that stadium.
©1997-2013 49erswebzone.com. Part of Skybox 360 Media, LLC
