There are 55 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Maiocco: Singletary undecided on next week's starter at QB

I think it's asinine to believe witholding the name of our starter would impact the Colts either way . . . . . . as if the Colts would prepare for anyone but Smith.

Come on guys.
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I think it's asinine to believe witholding the name of our starter would impact the Colts either way . . . . . . as if the Colts would prepare for anyone but Smith.

Come on guys.

lol, my thoughts exactly.
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I think it's asinine to believe witholding the name of our starter would impact the Colts either way . . . . . . as if the Colts would prepare for anyone but Smith.

Come on guys.

lol, my thoughts exactly.

but it is the way of the Nolan. the smokescreen technique
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I think it's asinine to believe witholding the name of our starter would impact the Colts either way . . . . . . as if the Colts would prepare for anyone but Smith.

Come on guys.

lol, my thoughts exactly.

but it is the way of the Nolan. the smokescreen technique

yea, just like Crabtree named the starter last week. All smoke and mirrors.
once you make a QB change like that and he comes through (for the most part) you gotta PLAY TO WIN THE GAME

implying smith will start

at the worst they'll end up with an 8-8 record which is the best hill would've produced for us since he obviously can't handle a pass rush and we obviously can't pick up a pass rush...at least smith will add some dimension to the games with his legs and being able to stretch the field.