Why hasn't Roman been cut yet? | Page 16

Apr 10, 2009 at 11:57 PM

joesfumanchu
Member
Posts: 778

Originally posted by ObePwnD:
Originally posted by Grigga2021:
Some of you people are probly sayin f**k that Grigga, BUT as a back up he provides solid depth and we already know what we got in him and he knows the system. I think it would be wise to keep him around.

Solid depth? What we have in him is a chump that is our weakest link in the secondary.

We can keep him around to fill the Gadorade bottles.

The guy is as dumb as a bag of rocks for sure.

Apr 10, 2009 at 11:59 PM

#227

Kolohe
Hall of Fame
Posts: 59,939

Apr 11, 2009 at 12:38 AM

#228

FederalAgent49
Veteran
Posts: 1,444

Originally posted by Grigga2021:
Some of you people are probly sayin f**k that Grigga, BUT as a back up he provides solid depth and we already know what we got in him and he knows the system. I think it would be wise to keep him around.

That quote is as equivalent as saying i would like to keep the STD i was just infected with. (hypothetically speaking of course).

Mark Roman was good for one thing only, wearing the radio in the helmet. i rather have mike rumph, or ahmed plummer, or even jose cortez......"yes i went there" back on the team then have a cancer like Roman on our team. he did request a trade which means he does not want to be a part of this team.

[ Edited by FederalAgent49 on Apr 11, 2009 at 12:38 AM ]

Apr 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM

#229

m_brockalexander
Veteran
Posts: 13,203

Can't even believe that this was proposed.....

NINER MADMAN

Apr 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM

#230

ninerfan818
Veteran
Posts: 6,381

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Can't even believe that this was proposed.....

NINER MADMAN

Apr 11, 2009 at 1:49 AM

#231

FederalAgent49
Veteran
Posts: 1,444

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Can't even believe that this was proposed.....

NINER MADMAN

just goes to show to lack of IQ that we were blessed with this offseason(the worst by far in terms to rediculious posts)

Apr 11, 2009 at 3:28 AM

#232

9erfanAUS
Veteran
Posts: 16,281

Originally posted by FederalAgent49:
Originally posted by Grigga2021:
Some of you people are probly sayin f**k that Grigga, BUT as a back up he provides solid depth and we already know what we got in him and he knows the system. I think it would be wise to keep him around.

That quote is as equivalent as saying i would like to keep the STD i was just infected with. (hypothetically speaking of course).

Mark Roman was good for one thing only, wearing the radio in the helmet. i rather have mike rumph, or ahmed plummer, or even jose cortez......"yes i went there" back on the team then have a cancer like Roman on our team. he did request a trade which means he does not want to be a part of this team.

he didn't request a trade.

We gave him permission to seek a trade when he was informed that he would no longer be starting.

Btw, if we do cut Roman, who backs up Goldson?

-9fA

Apr 11, 2009 at 8:54 AM

#233

Grigga2021
Veteran
Posts: 1,089

like i said Keep Mark Roman.

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:01 AM

#234

nivek
Info N/A

I'm all for keeping him as a back up! He's a vet!

But is HE willing to stay here as a back up?

That's the bigger question.

I don't think he can start anywhere else though, so he might have to suck it up. His disgruntled ass better not start causing problems though.

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:14 AM

#235

gababiloba2
Info N/A

Yeah, I can't see anyone else actually wanting to give anything up for him and actually trade for him. He'll stay on as a veteran back-up.

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:24 AM

#236

E-49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,025

Keep Roman? The guy sucks on the field and is a crybaby because he lost his starting position. Roman was the biggest Nowin guy on the team and you want to keep him? I would much rather draft a rookie or have Reggie Smith or Jimmy Williams back up Goldston then keep Roman on the team. Roman doesn't make plays and is always getting burnt in coverage. We will probably cut him after the draft if we end up drafting a FS or he will be let go in the first round of cuts if there are no injuries.

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:35 AM

#237

glorydayz
Veteran
Posts: 12,457

The bigger question is "what is his salary"? I believe he is getting paid quite well, and FS is one of the lowest paid positions in football.

As far as him (Roman) knowing the system, just train someone else to know the system, that's why we call those guys "COACHES"! (shakes head)

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:36 AM

#238

Grigga2021
Veteran
Posts: 1,089

i think hes only makin like 900,000$$$ not positive though

Apr 11, 2009 at 9:59 AM

#239

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,783

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The bigger question is "what is his salary"? I believe he is getting paid quite well, and FS is one of the lowest paid positions in football.

As far as him (Roman) knowing the system, just train someone else to know the system, that's why we call those guys "COACHES"! (shakes head)

It's more than knowing the system, he provides veteran leadership in the locker room and can help the younger guys in film study. He can back up both safety spots as well. He is a decent option as a backup and isn't hurting the payroll.

Apr 11, 2009 at 10:03 AM

#240

evil
Veteran
Posts: 45,783

Originally posted by FederalAgent49:
Originally posted by Grigga2021:
Some of you people are probly sayin f**k that Grigga, BUT as a back up he provides solid depth and we already know what we got in him and he knows the system. I think it would be wise to keep him around.

That quote is as equivalent as saying i would like to keep the STD i was just infected with. (hypothetically speaking of course).

Mark Roman was good for one thing only, wearing the radio in the helmet. i rather have mike rumph, or ahmed plummer, or even jose cortez......"yes i went there" back on the team then have a cancer like Roman on our team. he did request a trade which means he does not want to be a part of this team.

How is he a cancer ?