Originally posted by WyattEarp:
Dude. Why would we trade back from 30 to say 42-50 for only a fourth round pick. Screw that man. That's a rip off. You have to at least get a third early at that to miss losing out at a better potential Guy just for measly fourth round Guy.
I was thinking more along the lines of 30 to say 35-38ish. I definitely wouldn't go all the way to 50. I worded it wrong then. Yeah, if we went to 50 I would want a at least a 3rd rounder. Also, remember how we traded down from 79 to 90 and still got Bowman because we knew he would be there and still got a 4th the next year from San Diego? Well, I was thinking along the lines of that and us targeting someone in that 35-38ish range, maybe lower who we knew would be there and get an extra 4th... and if we go lower an extra 3rd. Could be a 6/7th as well.