Originally posted by Chance:
Originally posted by mcwoot:
WHat specifically do you disagree with
Mainly the idea that this draft and the last class can be judged today. It's absurd.
He isn't judging the 2026 draft class, just saying the picks were "reaches" based on consensus ranking. Consensus ranking theoretically shouldn't matter but based on the extremely poor draft record in the last 5 years + "reaching" based on consensus ranking, there can be a question as to why our draft board is so different than the "consensus." It would be one thing if Lynch had a great track record. He doesn't.
A better presentation would be if Sharp compared Lynch to the draft record of a team who had "value" based on consensus ranking and seeing if their picks were more successful.
I do agree that the 2024 and 2025 evaluations by Sharp are a bit off. Renardo Green has been mostly good. Upton Stout was very good last year. I really don't care about PFF rankings. That can't be used as evidence. Collins and Sigle both had ups and downs but showed a lot of promise in their rookie years (at least Collins did, for sure).
[ Edited by Leathaface on Apr 25, 2026 at 10:48 PM ]