There are 362 users in the forums
Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
I remember when they cut Boldin and replaced him with a CFL player. I will be satisfied with the Smith move if the 49ers have three WRs on the team next year that outperform T Smith in 2017.
Originally posted by Big_Daddy:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Originally posted by OnTheClock:Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
Originally posted by mojave45:Originally posted by OnTheClock:Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
Yup. And it sets a tone. Produce or go. It's time the players are held accountable for their individual performances. We had a bad team,but that doesn't mean a receiver should run lazy routes, or not block properly. That is just an example of course, but that line of thinking should hold true for every player. Do your damn job, the best you possibly can on every play. No more living in a reputation, ogling here multiple years and not producing based on potential for next year.
Originally posted by mojave45:Originally posted by OnTheClock:Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
Yup. And it sets a tone. Produce or go. It's time the players are held accountable for their individual performances. We had a bad team,but that doesn't mean a receiver should run lazy routes, or not block properly. That is just an example of course, but that line of thinking should hold true for every player. Do your damn job, the best you possibly can on every play. No more living in a reputation, ogling here multiple years and not producing based on potential for next year.
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
spitting out that knowledge and facts. Smith is a one trick pony and he will find a better fit elsewhere.
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Originally posted by mojave45:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Originally posted by Shorteous:
Originally posted by Big_Daddy:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
Yup. And it sets a tone. Produce or go. It's time the players are held accountable for their individual performances. We had a bad team,but that doesn't mean a receiver should run lazy routes, or not block properly. That is just an example of course, but that line of thinking should hold true for every player. Do your damn job, the best you possibly can on every play. No more living in a reputation, ogling here multiple years and not producing based on potential for next year.
Originally posted by mojave45:
Yup. And it sets a tone. Produce or go. It's time the players are held accountable for their individual performances. We had a bad team,but that doesn't mean a receiver should run lazy routes, or not block properly. That is just an example of course, but that line of thinking should hold true for every player. Do your damn job, the best you possibly can on every play. No more living in a reputation, ogling here multiple years and not producing based on potential for next year.
Originally posted by mojave45:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Originally posted by Shorteous:
Originally posted by Big_Daddy:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
Look at it this way: Kerley roughly tripled Smith's production. Additionally, Patton and Celek both gained more yards than Smith. Draughn was 4 yards away from matching Smith's receiving yardage total. It was time to go. You can argue it was a bad QB, but when you've got other players on the team out-performing him, and other players on OTHER teams with arguably WORSE QB's last year than us still producing, it ultimately points to the player himself not getting it done.
Yup. And it sets a tone. Produce or go. It's time the players are held accountable for their individual performances. We had a bad team,but that doesn't mean a receiver should run lazy routes, or not block properly. That is just an example of course, but that line of thinking should hold true for every player. Do your damn job, the best you possibly can on every play. No more living in a reputation, ogling here multiple years and not producing based on potential for next year.
Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by TheWooLick:I remember when they cut Boldin and replaced him with a CFL player. I will be satisfied with the Smith move if the 49ers have three WRs on the team next year that outperform T Smith in 2017.
I think, objectively, it has to be production per dollar. That's the only way you can normalize the two players and gauge whether the decision was beneficial or not (smith and his replacement). All comparisons must be normalized and it only seems logical to normalize based on player cost.
2017 Salary: 6.5mil
2016 stats (obviously a projection but I can't see the future so what ever):
REC: 20 --> 325K per catch
TGTS: 49 --> 132K per target
YDS: 267 --> 24K per yard
------------------
^ That's the benchmark for his replacement, we'll see if Lynch can find somebody that will charge less than 325K per catch or less than 24000 per yard. (Yes I added the zeros for effect)
