Originally posted by fropwns:
Originally posted by jedediahyork:But by stating it this way, you are supporting my point. He made all the difference. If we are behind because of him. We came back because of him. The defense on those runs were good, but not 2011 good. I will concede this. Of course, you need both. Neither was perfect, but Kaep made the difference for us in our second playoff run. He destroyed the Packers. Mauled them. Just nasty stuff.
Originally posted by fropwns:
How about I make this easy for you. I think he was the strength of that run and that you are conveniently forgetting the s**t hole we were in when we played that game. Or they forget the run we went on with him as our QB.
2012 vs GB: Kaep started poorly (early pick), finished strong:
- Over a 181 yards on the ground and two tds
- Over 260 yards in the air and two tds
2012 vs Atl
- The Niners came back from 17 points down and won their first road playoff game in 24 years.
- Kaep was 16/21 for 233 and a td; plus he added 21 yards on the ground.
2012 vs Blt
- After the return of Jones, the Niners were down 28-6; hell with it, just read it man: http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/2/4/3949488/super-bowl-2013-colin-kaepernick-49ers
Without this man, we wouldn't have even been in the game. Let alone had a chance to win it. If this is his greatest achievement, then so be it. But don't tell me that he had no impact. Or that I don't know football. I know winning. And this man has brought us closer than anyone else playing under center since Steve Young.
And yet, we wouldn't have been in those holes if he didn't start poorly (the Green Bay game he was at least able to score in the first half). Thankfully the defense was able to hold two of the best offenses in the NFL to a total of 10 second half points while he got his shiz together. And then in the Super Bowl, he had another horrible start.
He didn't make "all the difference." He played poorly in the first half of those games, and luckily the defense was able to step up their game in the second half to compensate. People like to complain about the defense disappearing, but forget the defense held two of the best offenses long enough to give Kap a chance to make up for poor play. If the defense doesn't hold those two teams to 10 total points in a combined four quarters, it doesn't matter how many points the offense scores. He scored 0 points in the first quarter of the ATL game and played from behind most of the game, but at least he was able to score in the GB game keeping it somewhat competitive after throwing that pick.
And look at the Super Bowl. Nobody would be talking about a comeback against prevent defense if Kap could score more than 6 points in the first half of that game.
It was a good team effort. Kap was not the reason we won those games, and he wasn't the reason we lost the Super Bowl. But he most definitely didn't play well enough to win the Super Bowl, just like the rest of the team didn't play well enough to win it.
[ Edited by jedediahyork on Jan 20, 2016 at 8:18 PM ]












