Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:My point is that we had our de replacement targeted last year with Carradine. Why are they saying we need another? The consensus is we will be targeting DBs + outside speed. Last year's draft was supposed to be our defensive depth year after the dline faded down the stretch.
Justin and McDonald are getting old. We will need to replace them.
Last year, we drafted Carradine to replace one of them and we did have the needed depth on the line last.
I guess that site thinks that we still have one to replace.
That site could feel that this draft is deep enough in wide receivers and cornerbacks that the proper pick in the first is a defensive tackle.
It is no more than their opinion. I do not believe that they are only site suggested we take a DE first. I may wrong. Also, I believe some members of this forum have suggested that we draft a DE in the first.
It is not really important if one agrees with them or disagrees with them.
Who Baalke and company decide to draft is important, not a mock done by a talking head.
[ Edited by buck on Mar 23, 2014 at 3:20 PM ]
