Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 505 users in the forums

The truth about Dashon Goldson.

Shop Find 49ers gear online
  • smileyman
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by Niners99:

first lets look at his positives. he seemed to really have a knack for jarring the ball loose. in the game that basically started driving this myth, monday night vs. AZ, he made alot of very fundamental hits to knock the ball free.

he also tied for the NFL lead in sacks by S, with 3, although that was really all he did in the business of getting to the QB. hes nowhere to be found in QB hits or pressures, so you cant really call him a "pass rushing S".

Goldson actually has two sacks according to NFL.com which is the authority here. There's no such thing as a "pass rushing safety" anyway, since the only reason a safety should be going after the QB is if a blitz was called, and generally when the 49ers call blitzes it's the LB or a DB going in, not the safety.

Already you're looking bad because you've used incorrect information in coming to a faulty conclusion about a position that doesn't exist. Let's go on.

Quote:

He was solid against stopping the run, as was our entire D. finished in the top 10 for total tackles by a S in the NFL. he also picked off 4 passes, good for an 8 way tie for 7th most. (although he did have alot of chances)

You managed to get one piece of information correct here, and that's the number of INTs. However Goldson is a FS, and he's tied for 5th in the league in INTs by a FS. You also failed to bring up that he's tied for 2nd amongst FS for forced fumbles.

Quote:

and now for the not so impressive stuff.

Dashon Goldson was the worst cover S in football this season. yes, jarring fumbles loose is great, racking up tackles is nice too, but if youre a defensive back, you better be able to cover a pass catcher, or youll be out of a job no matter how hard you hit.

he was thrown at 52 times, good for 5th most in the NFL (which explains the high tackle total). he also gave up the 6th most yardage to pass catchers he was responsible for with 438, just 10 more yds than his buddy Michael Lewis at 7th. he gave up 3 TD's, which was top 15 (in a bad way).

while he racked up alot of tackles, he also missed 13 tackles, which is the 6th highest NFL total. only 2 PD this season, which is ranked 33rd.

According to NFL.com, Goldson had 10 PD this year, which ties him at 10th among FS (don't go comparing Passes Defended against CBs or SS--compare a player to his own position).

Quote:

now im not making this thread to tear him down, or to call him a bad player. hes still young, and has the tools to possibly get alot better and make his game more well rounded. right now, hes a hard hitter, he can knock a ball loose, and he seems to be around the ball alot. whether or not its because he cant cover, im not sure.

but the point is, he was not a pro bowl player this year, not even close. he can stuff the run, he can hit, he can even get after the passer a little bit, but until he improves his AWFUL coverage skills, he will be a liability to this defense. i have faith he can improve his coverage, but by no means should his job be safe.

So after digging around a bit it seems like you're using ProFootballFocus.com's stats? Well keep in mind that those are nowhere near official and are simply a couple of guy's (well several) opinion of how players stack. If you look at the list of safeties, you'll see that they rank Kerry Rhodes as the #2 safety overall. This is the same Kerry Rhodes that lost his starting job with the Jets, then was cut as soon as their season ended. They also say that Mark Roman is in the top 3rd of the league for safeties.

I would take anything they put down with a grain or two of salt. They have some interesting information and some interesting ways of looking at things but it's all subjective and their stats are not official stats from the NFL.
Originally posted by smileyman:
Originally posted by Niners99:

first lets look at his positives. he seemed to really have a knack for jarring the ball loose. in the game that basically started driving this myth, monday night vs. AZ, he made alot of very fundamental hits to knock the ball free.

he also tied for the NFL lead in sacks by S, with 3, although that was really all he did in the business of getting to the QB. hes nowhere to be found in QB hits or pressures, so you cant really call him a "pass rushing S".

Goldson actually has two sacks according to NFL.com which is the authority here. There's no such thing as a "pass rushing safety" anyway, since the only reason a safety should be going after the QB is if a blitz was called, and generally when the 49ers call blitzes it's the LB or a DB going in, not the safety.

Already you're looking bad because you've used incorrect information in coming to a faulty conclusion about a position that doesn't exist. Let's go on.

Quote:

He was solid against stopping the run, as was our entire D. finished in the top 10 for total tackles by a S in the NFL. he also picked off 4 passes, good for an 8 way tie for 7th most. (although he did have alot of chances)

You managed to get one piece of information correct here, and that's the number of INTs. However Goldson is a FS, and he's tied for 5th in the league in INTs by a FS. You also failed to bring up that he's tied for 2nd amongst FS for forced fumbles.

Quote:

and now for the not so impressive stuff.

Dashon Goldson was the worst cover S in football this season. yes, jarring fumbles loose is great, racking up tackles is nice too, but if youre a defensive back, you better be able to cover a pass catcher, or youll be out of a job no matter how hard you hit.

he was thrown at 52 times, good for 5th most in the NFL (which explains the high tackle total). he also gave up the 6th most yardage to pass catchers he was responsible for with 438, just 10 more yds than his buddy Michael Lewis at 7th. he gave up 3 TD's, which was top 15 (in a bad way).

while he racked up alot of tackles, he also missed 13 tackles, which is the 6th highest NFL total. only 2 PD this season, which is ranked 33rd.

According to NFL.com, Goldson had 10 PD this year, which ties him at 10th among FS (don't go comparing Passes Defended against CBs or SS--compare a player to his own position).

Quote:

now im not making this thread to tear him down, or to call him a bad player. hes still young, and has the tools to possibly get alot better and make his game more well rounded. right now, hes a hard hitter, he can knock a ball loose, and he seems to be around the ball alot. whether or not its because he cant cover, im not sure.

but the point is, he was not a pro bowl player this year, not even close. he can stuff the run, he can hit, he can even get after the passer a little bit, but until he improves his AWFUL coverage skills, he will be a liability to this defense. i have faith he can improve his coverage, but by no means should his job be safe.

So after digging around a bit it seems like you're using ProFootballFocus.com's stats? Well keep in mind that those are nowhere near official and are simply a couple of guy's (well several) opinion of how players stack. If you look at the list of safeties, you'll see that they rank Kerry Rhodes as the #2 safety overall. This is the same Kerry Rhodes that lost his starting job with the Jets, then was cut as soon as their season ended. They also say that Mark Roman is in the top 3rd of the league for safeties.

I would take anything they put down with a grain or two of salt. They have some interesting information and some interesting ways of looking at things but it's all subjective and their stats are not official stats from the NFL.

first off, i never said anything about a pass rushing safety being a position. some safeties are good at blitzing the QB, some are not. when a safety blitz is called, you can either get to the QB, or you cant. same as any position thats called on to blitz.

and yes, i use pro football focus. theyre stats guys who step through every game and record the stats as they see them, not the NFL. they arent making crap up. their opinions on credit for sacks and pd's, etc might be different than the NFL. frankly, nothing makes the NFL stat guys any better than the PFF guys. you dont know anything about either group of stat keepers.

your loyalty to NFL.com, and trying to make me look foolish by using their stats, is pointless. i can make the same argument back about NFL.com.

the point is, stats are stats. they arent the end all be all, but they are a legit way to track a players performance. the fact that they have Kerry Rhodes ranked 2nd means his actual stats that he tallied during the season were good enough to be combined into a number that listed him among the best.

unless you can prove that PFF just makes their stats up, im inclined to beleive their information to be a legit way of anaylsis.

all the homers that got upset with me for poking holes in Goldsons season are doing so over nothing. i gave him credit where it was due, but pointed out that, regardless of HOW bad he was in coverage this season, he was bad either way. be it the very worst, or the 10th worst. the fact is that he sucked at coverage.

last time i checked, a FS's biggest priority is coverage.
I suppose some of you guys want Roman reinstated as the starter?

  • smileyman
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by Niners99:


all the homers that got upset with me for poking holes in Goldsons season are doing so over nothing. i gave him credit where it was due, but pointed out that, regardless of HOW bad he was in coverage this season, he was bad either way. be it the very worst, or the 10th worst. the fact is that he sucked at coverage.

last time i checked, a FS's biggest priority is coverage.

If a FS's biggest priority is coverage than why in the world would you even want to talk about sacks? Rather than talk about the total number of yards given up you need to talk about the total number of yards given up per target attempt and the total number of yards given up per snap. If we look at it based on total time on the field it becomes clear that he is by no means horrible at coverage.

Goldson took more snaps out there than any safety in the league but one, and that was Chris Hope, a SS. You say he gave up 448 yards in coverage. Well he took 1108 snaps, so he only gave up 2.4 yards every time he was on the field.

He had 13 MT (according to PFF). That equals out to less than 1 per game (pretty good in my book), and 1 in every 85 snaps.

He gave up 438 yards according to PFF, in 52 throws at him. That's 8.4 yards per throw. (That 52 attempts is the 2nd most out of all FS, 5th most out of all safeties.)


Let's compare his Yards per target with all the Pro Bowl FS (including alternates).

Darren Sharper (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 37 times and gave up 221 yards. 5.9 yards per target

Ed Reed (Pro Bowl FS).Targeted 18 times and gave up 122 yards. 6.7 yards per target.

Jarius Byrd (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 18 times and gave up 124 yards. 6.8 yards per target.

Brandon Merriweather (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 30 times and gave up 296 yards. That's 9.8 yards per target.

Antoine Bethea (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 26 times and gave up 229 yards. That's 8.8 yards per target.

Nick Collins (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 29 times and gave up 266 yards. That's 9.2 yards per target.

Antrel Rolle (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 34 times and gave up 284 yards. That's 8.4 yards per target.


Average yard per target given up by Pro Bowl Free Safeties in 2009--7.9 yards. Yards per target given up by Dashon Goldson--8.4. Difference 1/2 a yard, yet you're calling him the worst cover guy in the league.


For fun let's look at the strong safeties too.

Brian Dawkins (Pro Bowl Safety).Targeted 48 times, gave up 303 yards. 6.3 yards per target.

Yeremiah Bell (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 61 times, gave up 409 yards. 6.7 yards per target.

Adrian Wilson (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 52 times, gave up 330 yards. 6.3 yards per target

Roman Harper (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 39 times, gave up 319 yards. 8.2 yards per target

Quinten Mikell (Pro Bowl Safety). Targeted 54 times, gave up 289 yards. 5.4 yards per target.


Average yard per target of this year's Prow Bowl Safeties--6.6 yards. Average yards per target of Dashon Goldson--8.4, about 1.5 yards more.


Based on yards per target attempt Goldson absolutely could be a Pro-Bowler, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him there next year.
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
I am usually very opposed to moving guys out of postion...but I cant shake the feeling Goldson is a stud Strong Safety waiting to happen.

I just don't know if DG is big enough to play SS.

I think the size requirements for playing Strong Saftey or greatly over rated. Its more about being agressive with your tackling and being a good persuit player. Its more the proactive spot and less reactionary. As long as he can hit and take down a larger player like a TE or Full back, which he has proven he can, should in theory excel in the postion. I am not saying its a sure thing, but Goldson's play has shown flashes of being better at the strong postion and I wouldnt mind at least getting a look at it in preseason. I could be wrong, but I guess I have heard this size arguement before...Franklin was to small to play nose, Smith isn't big enough to be a D -end in a 3-4.....
His hits are so vicious that I fear he may have a short career, but damn good for the next few years I think. I can't think of a 9er DB who put the fear in receivers since Lott.
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
I am usually very opposed to moving guys out of postion...but I cant shake the feeling Goldson is a stud Strong Safety waiting to happen.

I just don't know if DG is big enough to play SS.

I think the size requirements for playing Strong Saftey or greatly over rated.

This is incredibly true.

Ronnie Lott played at 6'-0" 205lbs. Troy Polamalu is 5'-10" 207lbs. Brian Dawkins is 6'-0" 210lbs.

At 6'-2" 200lbs, Goldson is plenty big for a strong safety.
Originally posted by Faceless:
The truth about the guy who posted this topic...... Ur a F*****g f*g.

Wow if I didnt love posting I would go off on you so bad..
[ Edited by ninersrule4 on Jan 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM ]
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by Faceless:
The truth about the guy who posted this topic...... Ur a F*****g f*g.

Wow if I didnt love posting I would go off on yous o bad..

I dont understand why a person cant point out a flaw about one of our players unless its Alex without people calling him out Goldson is decent but does make alot of mistakes and wasnt even near a pro bowl level this year.He gace up ALOT of plays through the air. He gave up more big playes through the air than he did picks thats not good
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
I dont understand why a person cant point out a flaw about one of our players unless its Alex without people calling him out Goldson is decent but does make alot of mistakes and wasnt even near a pro bowl level this year.He gace up ALOT of plays through the air. He gave up more big playes through the air than he did picks thats not good

thank you.

let me summarize what i wanted to say.

Goldon is young and shows potential.

however, he is lacking in coverage, and has been overrated by the zone.

i was just pointing that out. you mention a flaw in ONE of the few fan favorites on this board, and you get pelted for 5 pages.
Originally posted by smileyman:
Originally posted by Niners99:


all the homers that got upset with me for poking holes in Goldsons season are doing so over nothing. i gave him credit where it was due, but pointed out that, regardless of HOW bad he was in coverage this season, he was bad either way. be it the very worst, or the 10th worst. the fact is that he sucked at coverage.

last time i checked, a FS's biggest priority is coverage.

If a FS's biggest priority is coverage than why in the world would you even want to talk about sacks? Rather than talk about the total number of yards given up you need to talk about the total number of yards given up per target attempt and the total number of yards given up per snap. If we look at it based on total time on the field it becomes clear that he is by no means horrible at coverage.

Goldson took more snaps out there than any safety in the league but one, and that was Chris Hope, a SS. You say he gave up 448 yards in coverage. Well he took 1108 snaps, so he only gave up 2.4 yards every time he was on the field.

He had 13 MT (according to PFF). That equals out to less than 1 per game (pretty good in my book), and 1 in every 85 snaps.

He gave up 438 yards according to PFF, in 52 throws at him. That's 8.4 yards per throw. (That 52 attempts is the 2nd most out of all FS, 5th most out of all safeties.)


Let's compare his Yards per target with all the Pro Bowl FS (including alternates).

Darren Sharper (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 37 times and gave up 221 yards. 5.9 yards per target

Ed Reed (Pro Bowl FS).Targeted 18 times and gave up 122 yards. 6.7 yards per target.

Jarius Byrd (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 18 times and gave up 124 yards. 6.8 yards per target.

Brandon Merriweather (Pro Bowl FS). Targeted 30 times and gave up 296 yards. That's 9.8 yards per target.

Antoine Bethea (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 26 times and gave up 229 yards. That's 8.8 yards per target.

Nick Collins (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 29 times and gave up 266 yards. That's 9.2 yards per target.

Antrel Rolle (Pro Bowl FS) was targeted 34 times and gave up 284 yards. That's 8.4 yards per target.


Average yard per target given up by Pro Bowl Free Safeties in 2009--7.9 yards. Yards per target given up by Dashon Goldson--8.4. Difference 1/2 a yard, yet you're calling him the worst cover guy in the league.


For fun let's look at the strong safeties too.

Brian Dawkins (Pro Bowl Safety).Targeted 48 times, gave up 303 yards. 6.3 yards per target.

Yeremiah Bell (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 61 times, gave up 409 yards. 6.7 yards per target.

Adrian Wilson (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 52 times, gave up 330 yards. 6.3 yards per target

Roman Harper (Pro Bowl safety). Targeted 39 times, gave up 319 yards. 8.2 yards per target

Quinten Mikell (Pro Bowl Safety). Targeted 54 times, gave up 289 yards. 5.4 yards per target.


Average yard per target of this year's Prow Bowl Safeties--6.6 yards. Average yards per target of Dashon Goldson--8.4, about 1.5 yards more.


Based on yards per target attempt Goldson absolutely could be a Pro-Bowler, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him there next year.

if you think about, there's probably a good reason why he got thrown at so many times in the first place.
  • smileyman
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
I dont understand why a person cant point out a flaw about one of our players unless its Alex without people calling him out Goldson is decent but does make alot of mistakes and wasnt even near a pro bowl level this year.He gace up ALOT of plays through the air. He gave up more big playes through the air than he did picks thats not good

thank you.

let me summarize what i wanted to say.

Goldon is young and shows potential.

however, he is lacking in coverage, and has been overrated by the zone.

i was just pointing that out. you mention a flaw in ONE of the few fan favorites on this board, and you get pelted for 5 pages.

If you can point out a real flaw instead of an imagined one you wouldn't get pelted. I've posted the stats to show why Goldson is not a bad coverage safety. Refute them or don't make stupid comments.
  • smileyman
  • Info N/A
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by PhillyNiner:
I am usually very opposed to moving guys out of postion...but I cant shake the feeling Goldson is a stud Strong Safety waiting to happen.

I just don't know if DG is big enough to play SS.

I think the size requirements for playing Strong Saftey or greatly over rated. Its more about being agressive with your tackling and being a good persuit player. Its more the proactive spot and less reactionary. As long as he can hit and take down a larger player like a TE or Full back, which he has proven he can, should in theory excel in the postion. I am not saying its a sure thing, but Goldson's play has shown flashes of being better at the strong postion and I wouldnt mind at least getting a look at it in preseason. I could be wrong, but I guess I have heard this size arguement before...Franklin was to small to play nose, Smith isn't big enough to be a D -end in a 3-4.....

Goldson is 5 lbs smaller than the average Strong Safety.
  • ptinerocket
  • Info N/A
you know some ppl on this board can make real good lawyers
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone