Los Angeles Chargers QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Fields was better than Lance by far yesterday. It's not close. He won the game with the inferior team and worse field position too. Lance had all the advantages. Yet still lost. Better team, superior field position, better coaching. He couldn't do anything with all that.

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Lol I like Fields (he was my pick) but he wasn't anything special at all yesterday. Dude was given two broken coverages that turned into TDs. His INT was worse then Trey's imo. Fields would have lost the game all the same with an extra 100 yards of penalties.

using first take to prove anything is incredibly lame.

agreed with all of this.

i liked lance over fields though, and i think that will be proven out correct in the long term.

Yea I liked both guys. Liked Fields a little better due to the fact that he did work versus top tier talent. At the end of the game I wasn't thinking oh my god we made a horrible mistake taking Lance over Fields.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Fields was better than Lance by far yesterday. It's not close. He won the game with the inferior team and worse field position too. Lance had all the advantages. Yet still lost. Better team, superior field position, better coaching. He couldn't do anything with all that.

Lol no he was not. Man stop making stuff up.

All of Fields points came off massive penalties. Fields had 120 yards (one massive play off a broken coverage) we gave them 100 yards.

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Beyond the numbers, brother. Fields flashed special. Literally won the game for his time because no one made anything happen. That receiver was that open because Justin scrambled and threw back... HE did that. It wasn't a blown coverage. You're trying to downplay his performance by pretending like there wasn't a drastic difference in Chicago's offense in the 2nd half.

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Lol I like Fields (he was my pick) but he wasn't anything special at all yesterday. Dude was given two broken coverages that turned into TDs. His INT was worse then Trey's imo. Fields would have lost the game all the same with an extra 100 yards of penalties.

using first take to prove anything is incredibly lame.

agreed with all of this.

i liked lance over fields though, and i think that will be proven out correct in the long term.

Yea I liked both guys. Liked Fields a little better due to the fact that he did work versus top tier talent. At the end of the game I wasn't thinking oh my god we made a horrible mistake taking Lance over Fields.

one thing fields has over lance is that he's faster, nothing trey can do about that.

but trey needs to take a page from fields book and SLIDE

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
The bears were up 13 to 10. The niners had the ball. What does Lance do? Throws a lame ass interception. That was the loss there. It had nothing to do with penalties which is just an excuse. Unacceptable turnover at the worst time.

And to hear them say he's not josh allen, he's not athletic, and he doesn't have the arm talent makes me cringe. I'm chalking this loss up to the penalties and weather and Lance's growing pains. But damn if he plays like hell next week against a s**tty seaheaks team at home? Heads are going to roll. But i can see more excuses next week

"Divisional games are always tough"
"Pete always plays us tough"

Without 100 yards of stupid penalties they wouldn't have score a single TD.

Where were you every game Jimmy through a "lame" INT? Literally his first f**king game as the starter and you're trying to compare him to a guy that been in the league for 8 yrs….that's the problem with the constant debate.

SF wasn't winning that game with Jimmy all the same.

who gives a f**k what anyone on those stupid shows say? Stephen A Smith said he expects the Raiders to score more points then any team in the AFCW THEN picked the chargers to win. They're f**king idiots, listening to them make you dumber.

Good QBs take time to become that.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Beyond the numbers, brother. Fields flashed special. Literally won the game for his time because no one made anything happen. That receiver was that open because Justin scrambled and threw back... HE did that. It wasn't a blown coverage. You're trying to downplay his performance by pretending like there wasn't a drastic difference in Chicago's offense in the 2nd half.

It was 1000% a blown coverage. No reason Greenlaw needed to leave to go pursue.

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Fields was better than Lance by far yesterday. It's not close. He won the game with the inferior team and worse field position too. Lance had all the advantages. Yet still lost. Better team, superior field position, better coaching. He couldn't do anything with all that.

Lol no he was not. Man stop making stuff up.

All of Fields points came off massive penalties. Fields had 120 yards (one massive play off a broken coverage) we gave them 100 yards.

Well stop committing penalties. That's like saying "trey lance only completed that long pass because the bears turned it over".. yeah bro, that's football.. that's how it works.

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Beyond the numbers, brother. Fields flashed special. Literally won the game for his time because no one made anything happen. That receiver was that open because Justin scrambled and threw back... HE did that. It wasn't a blown coverage. You're trying to downplay his performance by pretending like there wasn't a drastic difference in Chicago's offense in the 2nd half.

It was 1000% a blown coverage. No reason Greenlaw needed to leave to go pursue.

Blown because Fields escaped pressure and was a potential threat as a runner.. see how that works? Greenlaw didn't get lost on his own.

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Well stop committing penalties. That's like saying "trey lance only completed that long pass because the bears turned it over".. yeah bro, that's football.. that's how it works.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Fields was better than Lance by far yesterday. It's not close. He won the game with the inferior team and worse field position too. Lance had all the advantages. Yet still lost. Better team, superior field position, better coaching. He couldn't do anything with all that.

Lol no he was not. Man stop making stuff up.

All of Fields points came off massive penalties. Fields had 120 yards (one massive play off a broken coverage) we gave them 100 yards.

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:
Beyond the numbers, brother. Fields flashed special. Literally won the game for his time because no one made anything happen. That receiver was that open because Justin scrambled and threw back... HE did that. It wasn't a blown coverage. You're trying to downplay his performance by pretending like there wasn't a drastic difference in Chicago's offense in the 2nd half.

It was 1000% a blown coverage. No reason Greenlaw needed to leave to go pursue.

Blown because Fields escaped pressure and was a potential threat as a runner.. see how that works? Greenlaw didn't get lost on his own.

pettis was literally just standing there. there should have been a defender occupying that area of the field.

guys this isn't difficult to understand

Originally posted by DaBeegDeek:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Fields was better than Lance by far yesterday. It's not close. He won the game with the inferior team and worse field position too. Lance had all the advantages. Yet still lost. Better team, superior field position, better coaching. He couldn't do anything with all that.

Lol no he was not. Man stop making stuff up.

All of Fields points came off massive penalties. Fields had 120 yards (one massive play off a broken coverage) we gave them 100 yards.

Well stop committing penalties. That's like saying "trey lance only completed that long pass because the bears turned it over".. yeah bro, that's football.. that's how it works.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Lol I like Fields (he was my pick) but he wasn't anything special at all yesterday. Dude was given two broken coverages that turned into TDs. His INT was worse then Trey's imo. Fields would have lost the game all the same with an extra 100 yards of penalties.

using first take to prove anything is incredibly lame.

agreed with all of this.

i liked lance over fields though, and i think that will be proven out correct in the long term.

Yea I liked both guys. Liked Fields a little better due to the fact that he did work versus top tier talent. At the end of the game I wasn't thinking oh my god we made a horrible mistake taking Lance over Fields.

one thing fields has over lance is that he's faster, nothing trey can do about that.

but trey needs to take a page from fields book and SLIDE

Yeah Fields was willing to miss out on an extra yard to not get hit in theory. With our s**t for brains linebackers he still got hit. But he knows to get down