Los Angeles Chargers QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
All that said, if Jimmy can go he needs to go. Trey needs more development.

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by Tigerlaw:
but he didn't look pretty to the eye

TDs only count if they satisfy a subjective standard known only to the lucky few

We can say this about either qb. The same people arguing that he put up 15 points in a half are the same ones who said our offense led by Jimmy putting up 28 points in 30 minutes of play was, "figured out" and, "so easy to defend".

Just pointing out the double standard. It goes both ways.

Lance showed a ton of potential, but also showed how raw he is. Of course I think most backups in the league are going to look like that with limited reps during the week and especially a guy as raw as Lance is.

Anyone supposing this game means he'll be all-world or is 💩 is just trying to argue points on a message board to kill time between games.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
All that said, if Jimmy can go he needs to go. Trey needs more development.

Develop what on the bench though? He needs game speed live reps.

Originally posted by Franchise408:
He did not outperform the starter. Knock it off.

Take out the blown coverage by Seattle, and he was 47% completions for 80 yards.
WITH the blown coverage, he was 50% completions for 150 yards.

The veteran starter was 61% completions for 165 yards. Jimmy was much more effective and much more efficient. And he wasn't playing against a garbage time defense either.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by 4ML:
It's weird to me that all the ppl who said - Lance is way too raw and not ready to play this season (and even maybe next season) are the same ppl who are quick to judge him on 1 half of football - where he was not supposed to come in and play. Not only that - they're judging his performance with a bias lens also - bc he was actually pretty decent for the situation he was in - and better than all the 1st round QBs in their first half this season.

lol

Ppl with agendas have agendas.

I think the issue is the fact that we don't have an experienced backup behind Jimmy this year and are riding that role with a rookie. You expect the backup to know the game plan and to have prepared like the starter over the week so they can come in and not skip a beat. Add to this the reality that our Starting QB is injury prone we should all expecting a little more from the backup. The solution IMO is to have 3 QB's on the roster so we always have a veteran back there that can execute the actual game plan in an emergency while we prepare Trey for the future.

We need a starter who doesn't do this:


"This is not a new issue for Jimmy G, and that is, you know, just unfortunate at this stage in his career where he's not seeing the field, and it doesn't look like that's going to change any time soon, because we've seen these same mistakes over and over again." Posey's words, but he's right.

Ypure acting as if Seattle was just playing a garden variety defense there.

This is what I find quite perplexing. People put a sound bite in plays like this, but Seattle was running an invert-2 something I've only seen them run maybe 2 times in 3 or 4 years. Very rare for them. Changes up the key read defenders. The fact that they felt the need to do this should say something and Diggs made a great play, Jimmy even pump fake and it didn't move Diggs much.

Also, I've seen this so many times. Teams will disguise and shift coverage pre-post like crazy. Yet people act like teams are just gonna come out and squat down cause they ain't worried.

You act like NFL teams don't run rubber coverages off of a disguised shell each and every game. This is very common in the NFL. It's a disguised shell with a robber over the middle, which is literally done all the time. The problem here is that Jimmy has poor field vision. This isn't some isolated incident. More importantly, he was looking in that direction. His eyes passed right over this defender as he went to his second read, and he was looking in that general direction. There was maybe 6 yards of space between Kittle and Diggs.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Hes not wrong. I said the same thing yesterday. Trey doesnt seem to be fast like fields or jaskson. He isnt elusive like wilson or murray. He doesnt seem to be very strong like hill and allen. I thought I was going to be blown away by his running, I havent been so far.

Trey Lance had a GPS tracked time at 21.54 MPH on this run.

That would of made him the 14th fastest ball carrier in the NFL last year right behind Will Fuller but ahead of AJ Brown.

Lamar Jackson's 2 fastest times in 2020 were at 20.64 and 20.52 MPH.👀#TreyLance #49ers pic.twitter.com/jdsuCpohjK

— John Chapman (@JL_Chapman) May 3, 2021

and that's at 6-4 225lbs

what's wrong with this run?

This is definitely Treys best run of the day. Extremely impressive play by him. pic.twitter.com/SsesKI4wZ5

— 49ersFilmFavorites (@49ers_Film) October 5, 2021

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Develop what on the bench though? He needs game speed live reps.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
He was effective for one drive. Rest of the half he was mediocre. This is the frustration with him, no consistency.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
All that said, if Jimmy can go he needs to go. Trey needs more development.

Develop what on the bench though? He needs game speed live reps.

Originally posted by Franchise408:
He did not outperform the starter. Knock it off.

Take out the blown coverage by Seattle, and he was 47% completions for 80 yards.
WITH the blown coverage, he was 50% completions for 150 yards.

The veteran starter was 61% completions for 165 yards. Jimmy was much more effective and much more efficient. And he wasn't playing against a garbage time defense either.

Originally posted by Franchise408:

Originally posted by frenchmov:
Im just telling you what happened on Sunday. Trey lance came in at halftime with no 1st team reps and out performed our veteran starter. Those are objective, quantifiable things.

I'm not claiming I was blown away by Trey but to hear people like you recount the game, you'd have thought he put up no scoring drives, had a bunch of turnovers & couldn't complete a pass.

Relax and give Trey some space to grow/learn. One day I'm confident he will win you over!

He did not outperform the starter. Knock it off.

Take out the blown coverage by Seattle, and he was 47% completions for 80 yards.
WITH the blown coverage, he was 50% completions for 150 yards.

The veteran starter was 61% completions for 165 yards. Jimmy was much more effective and much more efficient. And he wasn't playing against a garbage time defense either.

Originally posted by Franchise408:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
He was effective for one drive. Rest of the half he was mediocre. This is the frustration with him, no consistency.

Rest of the half, his receivers were getting no separation.
Even Baldy explained as much on 95.7 this morning. Receivers aren't beating their guys.

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by 4ML:
It's weird to me that all the ppl who said - Lance is way too raw and not ready to play this season (and even maybe next season) are the same ppl who are quick to judge him on 1 half of football - where he was not supposed to come in and play. Not only that - they're judging his performance with a bias lens also - bc he was actually pretty decent for the situation he was in - and better than all the 1st round QBs in their first half this season.

lol

Ppl with agendas have agendas.

I think the issue is the fact that we don't have an experienced backup behind Jimmy this year and are riding that role with a rookie. You expect the backup to know the game plan and to have prepared like the starter over the week so they can come in and not skip a beat. Add to this the reality that our Starting QB is injury prone we should all expecting a little more from the backup. The solution IMO is to have 3 QB's on the roster so we always have a veteran back there that can execute the actual game plan in an emergency while we prepare Trey for the future.

We need a starter who doesn't do this:


"This is not a new issue for Jimmy G, and that is, you know, just unfortunate at this stage in his career where he's not seeing the field, and it doesn't look like that's going to change any time soon, because we've seen these same mistakes over and over again." Posey's words, but he's right.

Ypure acting as if Seattle was just playing a garden variety defense there.

This is what I find quite perplexing. People put a sound bite in plays like this, but Seattle was running an invert-2 something I've only seen them run maybe 2 times in 3 or 4 years. Very rare for them. Changes up the key read defenders. The fact that they felt the need to do this should say something and Diggs made a great play, Jimmy even pump fake and it didn't move Diggs much.

Also, I've seen this so many times. Teams will disguise and shift coverage pre-post like crazy. Yet people act like teams are just gonna come out and squat down cause they ain't worried.

You act like NFL teams don't run rubber coverages off of a disguised shell each and every game. This is very common in the NFL. It's a disguised shell with a robber over the middle, which is literally done all the time. The problem here is that Jimmy has poor field vision. This isn't some isolated incident. More importantly, he was looking in that direction. His eyes passed right over this defender as he went to his second read, and he was looking in that general direction. There was maybe 6 yards of space between Kittle and Diggs.

Not saying teams don't do it, saying the frequency is different. But whatever, I'm sure it's just me being biased again.