There are 695 users in the forums
Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
McVay wouldn't get much more from Jimmy than he does film. The brilliance of what Kyle does is his use of one or more plays to set up other plays. It's the way he calls the plays, not the plays themselves.
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Right! You guys act like he's not a serviceable QB. Yeah he's make you want to pull your hair with his questionable throws, but there has been games where he has been on point.
Yep. Rams are still probably a playoff team with Jimmy. There is 0 chance with wolford
SWH didn't really think that through lol.
Originally posted by Polkadots:
Originally posted by boast:
lol we see SEA constantly signing our cast-offs. how's our record been against them?
even the smallest bit of info can create a competitive advantage. identifying one play in a certain situation during a game is enough to change the outcome. some fans saying we should all hope JG joins the Rams is ridiculous.
I literally addressed the Seattle point in my original post. I can't go back and change the outcome, but I am willing to absolutely defend the position Seattle would have lost the majority of the games against the 49ers over the past five years had they been without RW. RW, a player who has never been on the 49ers. Further, most of RW's success against the 49ers has not been by beating their defense with some sort of inside knowledge, it's been him doing what he always does--escaping, extending plays, and improvising. And if we are going the Seattle route, then by your logic, the signing of Sherman should have meant the 49ers' offense should have been unstoppable against Seattle the entire duration Sherman was with the team. Afterall, inside knowledge, amirite?
And while the smallest bit of information may provide a competitive advantage, the question is how much information can JG provide that isn't readily available by those who diligently study the film? I concede JG may provide some knowledge, but I disagree said knowledge is significant enough to alter things, consistently. Otherwise there would be a long history of teams signing cast-offs from team x, and then molly-whopping team x the next few times the teams play each other. There simply is no historical data to support such a claim. For each single event you can show, I can show a counter event (at least one, and that's being conservative).
Like I said, I don't doubt JG can provide some "inside" information. I simply doubt said information provides a significant competitive advantage, otherwise history would provide evidence backing up such a claim. In addition, teams would sign at least one cut player from as many teams as they could, each offseason, in order to acquire this "treasure trove" of knowledge.
Originally posted by glorydayz:We still have the hostage secured?
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
I get that Jimmy would be better than their backup. I would rather Jimmy not go there either. I just simply meant that the Rams with Jimmy are not nearly the threat that they are with Stafford.
In this made up scenario, it would be the Rams with Jimmy because Stafford would be hurt and unable to play, or it would be the Rams with Stafford without an injury. I'll sign up for the former over the latter.
Originally posted by Oregon49erfan:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
I get that Jimmy would be better than their backup. I would rather Jimmy not go there either. I just simply meant that the Rams with Jimmy are not nearly the threat that they are with Stafford.
In this made up scenario, it would be the Rams with Jimmy because Stafford would be hurt and unable to play, or it would be the Rams with Stafford without an injury. I'll sign up for the former over the latter.
But your made up scenario would never happen. With Stafford healthy, the Rams wouldn't pick up JG, even if he is released. The ONLY scenario where JG ends up with the Rams is with Stafford injured and unable to play.
So it's never going to be a Stafford or JG comparison. If JG ended up with the Rams, it would be because Stafford can't play. So them getting him wouldn't be a downgrade at all. It would be a massive upgrade from their current backup.
Originally posted by Oregon49erfan:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
I get that Jimmy would be better than their backup. I would rather Jimmy not go there either. I just simply meant that the Rams with Jimmy are not nearly the threat that they are with Stafford.
In this made up scenario, it would be the Rams with Jimmy because Stafford would be hurt and unable to play, or it would be the Rams with Stafford without an injury. I'll sign up for the former over the latter.
But your made up scenario would never happen. With Stafford healthy, the Rams wouldn't pick up JG, even if he is released. The ONLY scenario where JG ends up with the Rams is with Stafford injured and unable to play.
So it's never going to be a Stafford or JG comparison. If JG ended up with the Rams, it would be because Stafford can't play. So them getting him wouldn't be a downgrade at all. It would be a massive upgrade from their current backup.
Originally posted by Furlow:
SWH didn't really think that through lol.
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I would even do a pick swap for an AFC team, like give a team our 7th for their 6th or 5th. ANYTHING.
The #49ers will likely hold onto QB Jimmy Garoppolo until final rosters are cut down and release if a trade doesn't materialize, per @RapSheet pic.twitter.com/KBMVSre1X5
— OurSF49ers (@OurSf49ers) August 7, 2022
Originally posted by Brucey72:
The #49ers will likely hold onto QB Jimmy Garoppolo until final rosters are cut down and release if a trade doesn't materialize, per @RapSheet pic.twitter.com/KBMVSre1X5
— OurSF49ers (@OurSf49ers) August 7, 2022
Well looks like he will be released the day of final cuts like most expected
Originally posted by glorydayz:
We still have the hostage secured?
Originally posted by JTB1974:Still hoping we can get a day 3 pick or an OLine trade for him. But yeah, it's looking like he'll be cut the day before the 53 day.
Originally posted by Brucey72:
The #49ers will likely hold onto QB Jimmy Garoppolo until final rosters are cut down and release if a trade doesn't materialize, per @RapSheet pic.twitter.com/KBMVSre1X5
— OurSF49ers (@OurSf49ers) August 7, 2022
Well looks like he will be released the day of final cuts like most expected
The smart thing to do. I was worried they would try to do right by Jimmy over what's right for the team. No reason to cut him before that, It does nothing to benefit the team. It's not like we need the cap space at the moment.
