There are 439 users in the forums
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
So Nolans defense was a big part of them going 6-0. Then McDaniels decides he wants to have more of a say in how the defense is run. Then they go 2-8?
Yeah McDaniels, stick to offense if you want your team to succeed.
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
So Nolans defense was a big part of them going 6-0. Then McDaniels decides he wants to have more of a say in how the defense is run. Then they go 2-8?
Yeah McDaniels, stick to offense if you want your team to succeed.
That was I took from the Bronco's message board.
I had to laugh at all the "pure 34 vs Nolan's 34 hybrid" posts.
Ahhh... memories... Its funny to see other fans go through the same Nolan arguments we did.
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by jobiwon:
You guys are missing the connection. Miami is coaching in the Senior Bowl this year.
Coach Senior Bowl is back!!!!
Originally posted by Negrodamus:Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by jobiwon:
You guys are missing the connection. Miami is coaching in the Senior Bowl this year.
Coach Senior Bowl is back!!!!
damn good call. how did i not connect the dots
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
So Nolans defense was a big part of them going 6-0. Then McDaniels decides he wants to have more of a say in how the defense is run. Then they go 2-8?
Yeah McDaniels, stick to offense if you want your team to succeed.
That was I took from the Bronco's message board.
I had to laugh at all the "pure 34 vs Nolan's 34 hybrid" posts.
Ahhh... memories... Its funny to see other fans go through the same Nolan arguments we did.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
So Nolans defense was a big part of them going 6-0. Then McDaniels decides he wants to have more of a say in how the defense is run. Then they go 2-8?
Yeah McDaniels, stick to offense if you want your team to succeed.
That was I took from the Bronco's message board.
I had to laugh at all the "pure 34 vs Nolan's 34 hybrid" posts.
Ahhh... memories... Its funny to see other fans go through the same Nolan arguments we did.
Hard to stay a pure 3-4 for Denver when they lack the personnel to truly run the system full time. Going back and forth between both 3-4 and 4-3 schemes makes it harder for team to decipher what it is you are trying to do and going to do, and it forces them to prepare for both looks.
Originally posted by KRS-1:
http://bostonherald.com/sports/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1226848&position=1
So McD told Nolan he wanted to blitz less in 2010 ?
Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by Overkill:Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
So Nolans defense was a big part of them going 6-0. Then McDaniels decides he wants to have more of a say in how the defense is run. Then they go 2-8?
Yeah McDaniels, stick to offense if you want your team to succeed.
That was I took from the Bronco's message board.
I had to laugh at all the "pure 34 vs Nolan's 34 hybrid" posts.
Ahhh... memories... Its funny to see other fans go through the same Nolan arguments we did.
Hard to stay a pure 3-4 for Denver when they lack the personnel to truly run the system full time. Going back and forth between both 3-4 and 4-3 schemes makes it harder for team to decipher what it is you are trying to do and going to do, and it forces them to prepare for both looks.
Yeah, I remember having those exact same conversations about our team. That's why I found it so funny.
I don't know how much truth there is to this, but the broncos fans seem to think their earlier defensive success was due to Nolan and his hybrid scheme. Then McDaniels forced him to run more of a "pure" 34 and the defense fell apart. There are some fans that don't see things that way, but most seem to hate losing Nolan.
