1st Round Pick (2nd Poll, No Trade Downs) | Page 4

NinerBuff · 2018-01-05T11:35:46-08:00

Dec. 23, 2017 I think it's likely that we'll be either 4-12 or 5-11, and picking 5-7th overall. NOTE: I've eliminated QB, DT, S, and OT from the list as I don't see how we would select one of these positions. Results (141 total votes): Quentin Nelson - 33% Bradley Chubb - 17% Saquon Barkley - 15% Roquan Smith - 13% Minkah Fitzpatrick - 9% Harold Landry - 7% Calvin Ridley - 4% Courtland Sutton - 3% Arden Key - 1% Jan. 5, 2018 Niners will be picking either 9th or 10th (TBD). NOTE: I've eliminated QB and DT from the list, but added back in OT and S. I've also eliminated Bradley Chubb and Saquon Barkley as they are widely considered top-5 selections.

Jan 10, 2018 at 6:21 PM

#46

808niner4lyphe
Veteran
Posts: 7,611

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Joecool:
I think Bucs or Bears get Barkley.

browns

Colts

Jan 10, 2018 at 6:25 PM

#47

808niner4lyphe
Veteran
Posts: 7,611

Nelson in the 1st, and Hercules Mata'afa in the 2nd. Interior OL and Edge Rusher in the 1st two picks.

Jan 10, 2018 at 6:26 PM

#48

genus49
Moderator
Posts: 28,540

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
Nelson in the 1st, and Hercules Mata'afa in the 2nd. Interior OL and Edge Rusher in the 1st two picks.

No guarantee Hercules will fall to our low 2nd.

Jan 10, 2018 at 6:55 PM

#49

808niner4lyphe
Veteran
Posts: 7,611

Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:
Nelson in the 1st, and Hercules Mata'afa in the 2nd. Interior OL and Edge Rusher in the 1st two picks.

No guarantee Hercules will fall to our low 2nd.

Right, no guarantees but it'll be nice if he does. Kid was a beast and literally a one-man team when he played at Lahaina, I knew he was gonna be a special player, very humble kid off the field but a different animal on it.

Feb 4, 2018 at 9:53 PM

#50

FL9er
Veteran
Posts: 10,889

I know it says no trade downs in the title, but I'm beginning to lean that way at this moment. Unless Barkley falls, I see no difference between the 10th pick and the 30th pick in the 1st.

Feb 4, 2018 at 9:57 PM

#51

Phoenix49ers
Veteran
Posts: 132,549

Originally posted by FL9er:
I know it says no trade downs in the title, but I'm beginning to lean that way at this moment. Unless Barkley falls, I see no difference between the 10th pick and the 30th pick in the 1st.

I like the trade down option to be able to load up on the OL. So many quality lineman this year, I'd like to see them add another second rounder, maybe an extra third as well.

Feb 4, 2018 at 10:02 PM

#52

Bellaleo
Veteran
Posts: 1,800

Originally posted by FL9er:
I know it says no trade downs in the title, but I'm beginning to lean that way at this moment. Unless Barkley falls, I see no difference between the 10th pick and the 30th pick in the 1st.

Once Barkley and Nelson are off the board I agree

Feb 5, 2018 at 5:27 PM

#53

SmokeCrabtrees
Veteran
Posts: 15,580

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by FL9er:
I know it says no trade downs in the title, but I'm beginning to lean that way at this moment. Unless Barkley falls, I see no difference between the 10th pick and the 30th pick in the 1st.

I like the trade down option to be able to load up on the OL. So many quality lineman this year, I'd like to see them add another second rounder, maybe an extra third as well.

Maybe trade down and add a late pick in the 2nd for a 3rd and 4th?

Feb 5, 2018 at 6:00 PM

#54

BMoore56
Veteran
Posts: 4,370

Want josh Jackson.

Feb 5, 2018 at 7:44 PM

#55

Dillesq
Member
Posts: 1,512

If Nelson, smith and Barkley are off the board, we should trade down. This is a very deep draft for CB. We could trade down and nab Isaiah Wynn with a later first and Ronald jones/Isaiah Oliver with one of the 2nds we pick up.

Feb 5, 2018 at 7:57 PM

#56

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

For those of you who want to trade down, the question is who would want to trade up to #10?

Feb 5, 2018 at 8:01 PM

#57

49erBigMac
Veteran
Posts: 8,058

Originally posted by pdizo916:
For those of you who want to trade down, the question is who would want to trade up to #10?

It happened twice last year at almost identical spots. In this draft it would likely to be a team manoeuvring for one of the QB's, the Bills and Cards will be in the market for one, and several, Saints, Steelers, Patriots or Chargers May move for their QB of the future.

There are a load of question marks, but it could definitely happen.

Feb 5, 2018 at 10:24 PM

#58

SteveYoung
Member
Posts: 3,697

I can see the Chargers and Saints as logical partners to trade up.

The Saints would be a good trade partner.

27, 91, Mark Ingram and a 2019 1st

For

#9 and Arik Armstead

[ Edited by SteveYoung on Feb 5, 2018 at 10:25 PM ]

Feb 5, 2018 at 11:10 PM

#59

SmokeCrabtrees
Veteran
Posts: 15,580

Originally posted by 49erBigMac:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
For those of you who want to trade down, the question is who would want to trade up to #10?

It happened twice last year at almost identical spots. In this draft it would likely to be a team manoeuvring for one of the QB's, the Bills and Cards will be in the market for one, and several, Saints, Steelers, Patriots or Chargers May move for their QB of the future.

There are a load of question marks, but it could definitely happen.

Steelers trading up for Roquan would make sense. Give us Martavis and their 2nd

Feb 5, 2018 at 11:40 PM

#60

49erBigMac
Veteran
Posts: 8,058

Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Steelers trading up for Roquan would make sense. Give us Martavis and their 2nd

Hell no to Bryant, he's a head case, no more prima donna's on this team. There's no way the Steelers would trade up for anything but an heir apparent for Ben.

They have had huge success drafting LB's in various rounds, they have a specific skill set in mind and get guys wherever they draft.