There are 271 users in the forums
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by crew:If Browns select Garrett, then Niners choice at #2 will either be Thomas or Hooker (barring a trade). If Browns select Trubisky/Watson, then Garrett is a Niner.
They aren't drafting a safety at two
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by crew:If Browns select Garrett, then Niners choice at #2 will either be Thomas or Hooker (barring a trade). If Browns select Trubisky/Watson, then Garrett is a Niner.
They aren't drafting a safety at two
Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Originally posted by communist:Why do you think so?
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by crew:If Browns select Garrett, then Niners choice at #2 will either be Thomas or Hooker (barring a trade). If Browns select Trubisky/Watson, then Garrett is a Niner.
They aren't drafting a safety at two
Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Why would they bother to put up a smokescreen? To stop the Browns guessing our move and taking one?
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Go look at how many safeties have been drafted top two...it's simply not as important of a position vs qb,OL, pass rush, CB
Why would it be a smokescreen? What do they have to gain by lying about putting Ward at FS??
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by crew:If Browns select Garrett, then Niners choice at #2 will either be Thomas or Hooker (barring a trade). If Browns select Trubisky/Watson, then Garrett is a Niner.
They aren't drafting a safety at two
Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Why would they bother to put up a smokescreen? To stop the Browns guessing our move and taking one?
No I was more so thinking so nobody can say, " I think SF goes with Hooker, they need a S". Possibly be able to,trade,down and still get your guy if not outright take him at two if that's the way the dominos fall.
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:I was asked this by English and responded with this:
Ward and Tartt have two years left on their deals and Reid will be a FA so that's not an issue where all three guys combined make like what 10-11 mill. I just think if Garrett is gone, we don't like a QB at two, nor Allen or any other DL... we keep Hooker in our back pocket.
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Go look at how many safeties have been drafted top two...it's simply not as important of a position vs qb,OL, pass rush, CB
Why would it be a smokescreen? What do they have to gain by lying about putting Ward at FS??
I was asked this by English and responded with this:
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by crew:If Browns select Garrett, then Niners choice at #2 will either be Thomas or Hooker (barring a trade). If Browns select Trubisky/Watson, then Garrett is a Niner.
They aren't drafting a safety at two
Why not if Ward moving is a smokescreen? If we can't trade down, which I think when it's all said and done we will(with a good possibility twice in the first),I'm taking Hooker(if Ward in fact is a smokescreen) or reaching for Barnett.
Why would they bother to put up a smokescreen? To stop the Browns guessing our move and taking one?
No I was more so thinking so nobody can say, " I think SF goes with Hooker, they need a S". Possibly be able to,trade,down and still get your guy if not outright take him at two if that's the way the dominos fall.
Ward and Tartt have two years left on their deals and Reid will be a FA so that's not an issue where all three guys combined make like what 10-11 mill. I just think if Garrett is gone, we don't like a QB at two, nor Allen or any other DL... we keep Hooker in our back pocket.
huge waste IMO
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:A safety at #2
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Right we still have three very young safeties on this team...why draft yet another safety?
Sure imo there's a ton of players that can be put in back pocket but imo he's not top of the list. If we're gonna go DB I'm looking at a lock down CB like latimore over a safety.
Originally posted by SteveYoung:
NFL Comparison
Justin Smith
Bottom Line
Explosive defender who combines strength, quickness, and a muscle-car motor to drive him around the field making play after play. Has the hands and feet to be a quick-win specialist and the size to fit as a 4-3 or 3-4 defensive end who can reduce inside for pass-rush downs. He has all the athletic traits to become a high-impact player and possesses more than enough skill and talent to believe he will continue to elevate his game as a pro. Thomas has the potential to become the best defender from this draft class and a future all-pro
Sign me up. Teams win Championships with guys like Thomas.
Originally posted by jcs:Originally posted by NYniner85:Right we still have three very young safeties on this team...why draft yet another safety?
Sure imo there's a ton of players that can be put in back pocket but imo he's not top of the list. If we're gonna go DB I'm looking at a lock down CB like latimore over a safety.
Would make it the 3rd safety in the 1st round in 5 years...wow...
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tatdwolf49:A safety at #2
Totally agree grab Allen, Solomon, or a CB over a safety
doubt it...Allen not sure heard about his shoulder problems and D-linemen need their shoulders...Not sure about Solomon we need pass rush, LB and WR... I really hope we trade back such a deep class good players will drop...LB H.Reddick and WR C.Davis are my too 2 players I hope we get...
Originally posted by NYniner85:Just answering the question...Reid, Ward and if we draft another, three in 5 years.
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Right we still have three very young safeties on this team...why draft yet another safety?
Sure imo there's a ton of players that can be put in back pocket but imo he's not top of the list. If we're gonna go DB I'm looking at a lock down CB like latimore over a safety.
Would make it the 3rd safety in the 1st round in 5 years...wow...
What?