Originally posted by Izyniner:Frank Gore 5-9 217 to small for every down back?
No cause that's beefy AF.
There are 620 users in the forums
Browse 49ers books and videos
Originally posted by Izyniner:Frank Gore 5-9 217 to small for every down back?
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Originally posted by Izyniner:
Frank Gore 5-9 217 to small for every down back?
No cause that's beefy AF.
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by Izyniner:Frank Gore 5-9 217 to small for every down back?
No cause that's beefy AF.
fat absorbs, muscle tears
McAff is gonna be part of a one,two punch.. hope some dumb team avoids a more pressing position just cause McAff sounds good and gonna give their fan base a boner.
Originally posted by BuZzB05:No no.i don't want him. Pass on him!! Period
Originally posted by Jcool:
If you take him #2, you have to use him. If he has less then 1,000 all purpose yards its a waste of a pick.
Originally posted by okdkid:Originally posted by Jcool:If you take him #2, you have to use him. If he has less then 1,000 all purpose yards its a waste of a pick.
All purpose? He may have that by week 10. He will be a great PR/KR.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by Jcool:
If you take him #2, you have to use him. If he has less then 1,000 all purpose yards its a waste of a pick.
All purpose? He may have that by week 10. He will be a great PR/KR.
Originally posted by Kolohe:I think it's coming down to either Garrett or McCaffrey for me. I want Malik Hooker but I'm starting to think he's a long shot.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:Originally posted by Kolohe:I think it's coming down to either Garrett or McCaffrey for me. I want Malik Hooker but I'm starting to think he's a long shot.
I feel similar. Hooker is probably the best fit meets need for our new scheme/personnel and we haven't heard any rumor about him to us. That means it's him!!
That would be perfect, but hasn't hooker been rumored to he bears, jags etc?Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Originally posted by Cisco0623:Originally posted by Kolohe:I think it's coming down to either Garrett or McCaffrey for me. I want Malik Hooker but I'm starting to think he's a long shot.
I feel similar. Hooker is probably the best fit meets need for our new scheme/personnel and we haven't heard any rumor about him to us. That means it's him!!
They're probably trying to get him in a trade down.
Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:Saints,Eagles,Titans,Broncos I think are the top 4 destinations for him.
3. CHRISTIAN McCAFFREY, Stanford (5-11, 203, 4.49, 1): "He's the second-best back behind Fournette, who is head and shoulders above everybody," said one scout. "He's subtle with how good he is. Even though he's had all the acclaim he's still really good." Comes from a family of distinguished athletes in suburban Denver; father, Ed, was a 13-year NFL receiver. His interview was compared by one scout to Tim Tebow's. Put on a memorable receiving show at the combine. "Have you ever seen a guy catch the ball that good?" said another scout. "He's a mismatch guy, and when they get in the league they make hay. If he moves out to the edge you might have your 'sam' backer on him. The other thing is, you don't have to worry about that kid. He has been prepared for the NFL since he was born. When you get guys with dads that played in the league, they've been told all their lives to compete." Third-year junior finished with 632 carries for 3,922 (6.2) and 21 TDs to go with 99 catches for 1,206. Broke Barry Sanders' single-season record for all-purpose yards. Best year was 2015, when he was Heisman runner-up. "Everyone's anointing him as the next great white (hope)," said a third scout. "I'm a little skeptical. He didn't dominate as much as he did sophomore year. Why is that? What's the value of a third-down back and return specialist?" Wonderlic of 21.