Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 488 users in the forums

Quinton Patton-WR-Lousiana Tech

This isn't really all that good of a compilation but it does give you an idea of his quickness, ability to separate...etc


Just look at his game vs. SEC power Texas A&M.

21 catches
233 yards
4 TDs

In one game.
Sounds like a jerry rice type player. Would love a player like that. I.ll keep my eyes on him bcause we definately need another receiver. If ww could find another te aeound 6'6 that can catch and be a decent blocker a srong rb like mike gellislee I think hes from florida man what an offense
Nice looking player. Problem is that we already have that type of player in Crabs don't we?

I'd still rather cut Walker and get a TE that could be like Brent Jones. I think that would add more to our O than another wr at this point.

I guess I'm banking on what Trent said about Jenkins and that he will be our stud wr next year or the year after.

Dunno
He looks like a great talent but I agree with rk1642. We already have a couple of 4.50 guys in Crabtree and Manningham. I don't see Patton getting enough separation. CBs in the NFL are just a step faster which means this kid would have to constantly use his body instead of speed to get open.

I think we need a speedy receiver. Still not sure what he have in Jenkins but that would be the direction in which I'd be drafting.

Is this kid big enough to add weight and play TE?

I'm thinking we need a Tavon Austin type of player. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q3UOd9_Tkw
[ Edited by pete98146 on Dec 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM ]
Originally posted by rk1642:
Nice looking player. Problem is that we already have that type of player in Crabs don't we?

I'd still rather cut Walker and get a TE that could be like Brent Jones. I think that would add more to our O than another wr at this point.

I guess I'm banking on what Trent said about Jenkins and that he will be our stud wr next year or the year after.

Dunno


Were that the case, would you really be too upset with having two Crabtree's getting open and making plays after the catch with Jenkins streaking deep downfield?
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Were that the case, would you really be too upset with having two Crabtree's getting open and making plays after the catch with Jenkins streaking deep downfield?


Much rather have Crabs/Manningam/Jenkins and another burner. Plus looks like Austin can return kick offs and punts. Goodbye Teddy Ginn....
The difference is all of you wanting Austin would have to take him in the first round. There seems to be a lot of wide receiver depth in the middle rounds, so if we can address other needs in rounds 1-2 and pick up a receiver like Patton, Rogers, Marquess Wilson, Dobson, Jordan Matthews, etc. in the 3rd, that'd be my preference to taking Austin in the 1st.
If 49ers can get a Victor Cruz type WR and a Brent Jones type TE in the upcoming draft. I will be god damn happy. Imagine what Kaep can do with these two weapons?

49ers also need to draft a NT and DE to eventually take over. I'm not sure if Hunter can come back and be the same player. Can Hunter be an everydown back? It will be interesting once the draft comes around.
[ Edited by sacleads on Dec 18, 2012 at 11:54 AM ]
Originally posted by pete98146:
Much rather have Crabs/Manningam/Jenkins and another burner. Plus looks like Austin can return kick offs and punts. Goodbye Teddy Ginn....

So you replace the old Ted Ginn with the new Ted Ginn. Not all that impressed by Austin to be honest and he's definitely going to cost either a late 1st rounder or early-mid 2nd rounder. Patton is a far more complete receiver, dedicated run-blocker, quick to beat the press off the line, dangerous on slants and the ability to rack up yards after the catch is great too as you've only got so many solid-tackling defensive backs in the NFL.

[ Edited by Phoenix49ers on Dec 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM ]
Originally posted by mkary12:
The difference is all of you wanting Austin would have to take him in the first round. There seems to be a lot of wide receiver depth in the middle rounds, so if we can address other needs in rounds 1-2 and pick up a receiver like Patton, Rogers, Marquess Wilson, Dobson, Jordan Matthews, etc. in the 3rd, that'd be my preference to taking Austin in the 1st.


No way taking Austin in the first round. I would take him in the 3rd tho! After watching Welker and Amendola I'm down with drafting a "waterbug" type receiver.
Originally posted by pete98146:
No way taking Austin in the first round. I would take him in the 3rd tho! After watching Welker and Amendola I'm down with drafting a "waterbug" type receiver.

The interesting thing is that those "waterbugs" you mentioned, were both undrafted, that goes for Cruz too.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
So you replace the old Ted Ginn with the new Ted Ginn. Not all that impressed by Austin to be honest and he's definitely going to cost either a late 1st rounder or early-mid 2nd rounder. Patton is a far more complete receiver, dedicated run-blocker, quick to beat the press off the line, dangerous on slants and the ability to rack up yards after the catch is great too as you've only got so many solid-tackling defensive backs in the NFL.


Sorry Phoenix, I don't see the love for Patton. I see him more in the Mohamed Sanu/Alshon Jeffery mold. If Austin goes high, I'd settle for Marquess Wilson out of WSU. If he can go to the right team with a lot of veteran leadership, he'd be worth the risk. Guess we'll agree to disagree....
Originally posted by pete98146:
Sorry Phoenix, I don't see the love for Patton. I see him more in the Mohamed Sanu/Alshon Jeffery mold. If Austin goes high, I'd settle for Marquess Wilson out of WSU. If he can go to the right team with a lot of veteran leadership, he'd be worth the risk. Guess we'll agree to disagree....

Not at all. Patton's got a lot better quickness than either of those guys, much more refined, finds ways to get separation against pretty much anyone.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone