Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by valrod33:
the only deal that make sense is Zimmerman for Sandoval
Lincecum for Strasberg is laughable
I dont know much about posey so i have no comment on that part of the trade
If im washington and you propose that deal to me i trade you Strasberg for Lincecum then laugh in your face afterward
You would I'm sure but reality Val is that the Nats would never make the deal.
A year from now if Strasburg is pitching like this then maybe i would consider it, but you cant think that trading Lincecum for Strasburg is a good deal right now.
Lincecum is only what 24-25 years old, you are set with him for the next 10 years there is no reason to trade him he is not old at all.
The deal set was really a 3 for 3. I like Zimmerman MUCH more than Panda and like Harpers upside more than Posey's for the long run. I still like Posey a lot by the way.
My point was that the trio of Strasburg, Harper, and Zimmerman were more likely if they all hit their potential to lead you to the WS and be a great team. I really believe that but obviously in the minority in here.
you would be giving up a hell of alot for hoping that the dudes you just traded for hit their potential
I have no doubt whatsoever that Strasburg will. Harper would be the one I'd be most worried about.
