There are 97 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

You can have EITHER of these players in their prime to build your NBA franchise

You can have EITHER of these players in their prime to build your NBA franchise

Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.


We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Then I'm doing my job, and doing it well.

Exactly my point.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.


We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Then I'm doing my job, and doing it well.

Exactly my point.

shaqtus is my vote ... close tho
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.


We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Then I'm doing my job, and doing it well.

Exactly my point.

Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

David Robinson was no superstar in 2003.

And I'd take Jordan, barely. A dominating big man is a far more important element to a championship team, but Jordan not is the rare exception. Man, of Shaq had half the drive and discipline of Jordan . . .
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Oh no...Stoney is laughing at me...my life must be ruined..what am I ever going to do because Stoney is laughing at me. Are you 12? Your previous comment sounds like something I heard years ago in like....elementary school.
[ Edited by jrg on Feb 5, 2010 at 7:03 AM ]
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Jordan, by far. I'd want the leader of my team to demand excellence/hard work.
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Jordan, by far. I'd want the leader of my team to demand excellence/hard work.
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Oh no...Stoney is laughing at me...my life must be ruined..what am I ever going to do because Stoney is laughing at me. Are you 12? Your previous comment sounds like something I heard years ago in like....elementary school.

Classic j. Always ready to get your panties in a bunch instead of realizing when somebody is fcking with you.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Oh no...Stoney is laughing at me...my life must be ruined..what am I ever going to do because Stoney is laughing at me. Are you 12? Your previous comment sounds like something I heard years ago in like....elementary school.

Classic j. Always ready to get your panties in a bunch instead of realizing when somebody is fcking with you.

Oh, I'm sure. Lol
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Oh no...Stoney is laughing at me...my life must be ruined..what am I ever going to do because Stoney is laughing at me. Are you 12? Your previous comment sounds like something I heard years ago in like....elementary school.

Classic j. Always ready to get your panties in a bunch instead of realizing when somebody is fcking with you.

Oh, I'm sure. Lol

Yeah, you never get all riled up over something stupid and blow things completely out of proportion. My bad.
Shaq. For what it's worth the only series Jordan lost in his prime was to Shaq (granted he was coming off that layoff and wasn't quite Jordan).

To me I think it's easier to find that SG compliment and I'm taking Shaq and a Kobe, or a Wade over Jordan and Luc Longley.
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Shaq. For what it's worth the only series Jordan lost in his prime was to Shaq (granted he was coming off that layoff and wasn't quite Jordan).

To me I think it's easier to find that SG compliment and I'm taking Shaq and a Kobe, or a Wade over Jordan and Luc Longley.

Interesting take.
Originally posted by dobophile:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

David Robinson was no superstar in 2003.

And I'd take Jordan, barely. A dominating big man is a far more important element to a championship team, but Jordan not is the rare exception. Man, of Shaq had half the drive and discipline of Jordan . . .

Completely forgot about 2003.