You can have EITHER of these players in their prime to build your NBA franchise | Page 2

Feb 4, 2010 at 8:54 PM

jrg
Veteran
Posts: 166,549

Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

[ Edited by jrg on Feb 4, 2010 at 8:55 PM ]

Feb 4, 2010 at 8:57 PM

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

So it's just your obsession with Kobe that makes you drag him into this. Got it.

Feb 4, 2010 at 9:08 PM

#18

jrg
Veteran
Posts: 166,549

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

So it's just your obsession with Kobe that makes you drag him into this. Got it.

Yeah..ya got me there Stoney.

Feb 4, 2010 at 9:36 PM

#19

TheSixthRing
Beer Gut
Posts: 72,151

Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Feb 4, 2010 at 9:37 PM

#20

jrg
Veteran
Posts: 166,549

Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

Feb 4, 2010 at 10:30 PM

#21

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Feb 4, 2010 at 10:55 PM

#22

jrg
Veteran
Posts: 166,549

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Feb 4, 2010 at 11:01 PM

#23

Hoovtrain
Veteran
Posts: 30,684

Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

I agree to a certain extent. Olajuwon was the best center I have ever seen play and maybe the best C ever IMO, but you can argue that the only reason he won his titles was because Jordan was out of the league at the time.

Feb 4, 2010 at 11:20 PM

#24

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.

Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Feb 4, 2010 at 11:27 PM

#25

phatbutskinny
Veteran
Posts: 27,247

stoney i think u need to have a smoke

Feb 4, 2010 at 11:28 PM

#26

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by phatbutskinny:
stoney i think u need to have a smoke

You assuming I'm not is your FAIL.

Feb 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM

#27

TheSixthRing
Beer Gut
Posts: 72,151

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.

Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Feb 5, 2010 at 12:00 AM

#28

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

I agree to a certain extent. Olajuwon was the best center I have ever seen play and maybe the best C ever IMO, but you can argue that the only reason he won his titles was because Jordan was out of the league at the time.

Yeah, that's definitely a fair point.

Feb 5, 2010 at 12:01 AM

#29

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.

Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Feb 5, 2010 at 12:06 AM

#30

TheSixthRing
Beer Gut
Posts: 72,151

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.

Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Then I'm doing my job, and doing it well.