Originally posted by Method:
Greg Oden may still have trade value, but the dude sucks. Should have gotten Kevin Durant!
He's never going to live up to the insane hype, but Oden will be a very good player.
Basically, he's the Reggie Bush of big men.
There are 332 users in the forums
Originally posted by Method:
Greg Oden may still have trade value, but the dude sucks. Should have gotten Kevin Durant!
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
Kawakami Interview with Tolbert
Actually not that bad of an interview. (About Riley, Cohan, Rowell, Mullin)
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
It's a farcry from the garbanzo beans he puts out on his blog I can assure you that.
Warriors Now Have Lowest Paid GM in NBA
Larry Riley is making between $700k-$800k per season, according to a report from the Mercury News.
The average salary of an NBA general manager is approximately $1.5 million and the previous low salary belonged to Sam Presti at approximately $900k.
Chris Mullin, Golden State's previous general manager, was making around $1.5 million.
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
But Tyson Chandler? The Hornets should be willing as long as the Mavs agree to shoulder Peja Stojakovic's contract, too. Chandler would give the Mavs an athletic shot blocker, not to mention an easy four or five assists a night for Kidd. The Mavs should be thinking of ways to retrofit this club to best serve Kidd's talents. He could use offensive and defensive help at off guard. Golden State's Stephen Jackson might be had in exchange for Josh Howard, a Don Nelson favorite. With Chandler and Jackson, the Mavs would be significantly better defensively and offensively. Of course, if you take away Howard, you create another hole, but it's a risk the Mavs may be willing to take. Dallas Morning News
Jack for Howard? Let me think about it....
Yes.
Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
But Tyson Chandler? The Hornets should be willing as long as the Mavs agree to shoulder Peja Stojakovic's contract, too. Chandler would give the Mavs an athletic shot blocker, not to mention an easy four or five assists a night for Kidd. The Mavs should be thinking of ways to retrofit this club to best serve Kidd's talents. He could use offensive and defensive help at off guard. Golden State's Stephen Jackson might be had in exchange for Josh Howard, a Don Nelson favorite. With Chandler and Jackson, the Mavs would be significantly better defensively and offensively. Of course, if you take away Howard, you create another hole, but it's a risk the Mavs may be willing to take. Dallas Morning News
Jack for Howard? Let me think about it....
Yes.
Hell yes.
Originally posted by Jigga:Originally posted by crzy:Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
But Tyson Chandler? The Hornets should be willing as long as the Mavs agree to shoulder Peja Stojakovic's contract, too. Chandler would give the Mavs an athletic shot blocker, not to mention an easy four or five assists a night for Kidd. The Mavs should be thinking of ways to retrofit this club to best serve Kidd's talents. He could use offensive and defensive help at off guard. Golden State's Stephen Jackson might be had in exchange for Josh Howard, a Don Nelson favorite. With Chandler and Jackson, the Mavs would be significantly better defensively and offensively. Of course, if you take away Howard, you create another hole, but it's a risk the Mavs may be willing to take. Dallas Morning News
Jack for Howard? Let me think about it....
Yes.
Hell yes.
Before I state an opinion, can we compare their contract terms?
Jax just re-upped at $10M a season (yuck!). What's Josh's contract lookin like?
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
But Tyson Chandler? The Hornets should be willing as long as the Mavs agree to shoulder Peja Stojakovic's contract, too. Chandler would give the Mavs an athletic shot blocker, not to mention an easy four or five assists a night for Kidd. The Mavs should be thinking of ways to retrofit this club to best serve Kidd's talents. He could use offensive and defensive help at off guard. Golden State's Stephen Jackson might be had in exchange for Josh Howard, a Don Nelson favorite. With Chandler and Jackson, the Mavs would be significantly better defensively and offensively. Of course, if you take away Howard, you create another hole, but it's a risk the Mavs may be willing to take. Dallas Morning News
Jack for Howard? Let me think about it....
Yes.
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
So the NBA Live '10 Warriors roster for today would look like....
Biedrins, Wright, Belinelli for Bosh
Stack Jack for Howard
Draft Tyreke Evans/Brandon Jennings at 7
PG: Tyreke/Brandon, CJ Disaster
SG: Monta, Morrow
SF: Howard, Biceps
PF: Randolph, Bad Porn (only cuz Nelly says so)
C: Bosh, Turiaf
Is this team playoff bound? I completely forgot about Crawful...hopefully he gets some bad info about a team wanting to sign him long-term.
Originally posted by phiLthyphiL:
So the NBA Live '10 Warriors roster for today would look like....
Biedrins, Wright, Belinelli for Bosh
Stack Jack for Howard
Draft Tyreke Evans/Brandon Jennings at 7
PG: Tyreke/Brandon, CJ Disaster
SG: Monta, Morrow
SF: Howard, Biceps
PF: Randolph, Bad Porn (only cuz Nelly says so)
C: Bosh, Turiaf
Is this team playoff bound? I completely forgot about Crawful...hopefully he gets some bad info about a team wanting to sign him long-term.