49ers interested in trading for Revis (link provided) | Page 39

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:44 AM

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

^^^^THAT

[ Edited by valrod33 on Mar 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM ]

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM

NeeJ49er
Veteran
Posts: 9,580

Originally posted by sachie23:
How are they going to pay him and still lock up Crabtree, A. Davis, Iupati, and Kaep in the next 2 years? I just don't see it. They had interest in Nnamdi a couple of years ago. He's getting cut as early as today and he would be a lot cheaper. The 49ers just don't do things like this. They lock up their own players. I'm not saying it's impossible I just seriously doubt it. Media people see the 49ers have all these picks and assume they are a good fit because of it.

Asomugha would be a great fit, and yes , CHEAPER ....he would give us better pass coverage, and I'm sure a differemt scenario would do him a lot of good , being coached by an offensive line coach, and playing more zone coverage instead of press coverage didnt do him any favors ....I'm sure we could grab him , and keep our first 5 draft choice intact

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM

#573

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by dmax:
at first i was like ..yes go get him...but now I've changed my mind...too many variables in signing the guy

the hot shot from philly is getting cut today, i would look at him if the price is right

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:48 AM

#574

lazy
Veteran
Posts: 5,687

Originally posted by FunkNinerFlex:
Skip Bayless yesterday "The 49ers should give up their 1, 2, 2, 3, 3 for Revis."
Screw that. Even uninjured Revis ain't worth that. Only Mangini made sense by saying his ACL is the unknown and his contract demands is a huge cap hit.

we should also throw in Navarro Bowman, Patrick Willis, and Brooks...seems fair.

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM

#575

Jikkle49
Veteran
Posts: 921

Originally posted by Jcool:

Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet

RT @AlbertBreer: My understanding is that the Niners aren't talking with the Jets on Revis. At least not now. SF source: "We're not in it."

Not to say it's untrue but it would make absolutely 0 sense for an SF source to let it leak they were highly interested in him and it make sense to leak you weren't "interested". Just like how the Jets leaked the Falcons were "interested"

Remember how we weren't "interested" in Manning last year but only "evaluating" him

I think the trade is still unlikely but I don't really buy into sources from either side.

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM

#576

Jakemall
Veteran
Posts: 21,598

If we get him great...I just don't want to over spend.

Mar 6, 2013 at 8:59 AM

#577

ElephantHaley
Member
Posts: 7,020

Originally posted by guillotine31:

Originally posted by ElephantHaley:

Originally posted by FunkNinerFlex:
Skip Bayless yesterday "The 49ers should give up their 1, 2, 2, 3, 3 for Revis."
Screw that. Even uninjured Revis ain't worth that. Only Mangini made sense by saying his ACL is the unknown and his contract demands is a huge cap hit.

I like Skip Bayless but HHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEECCCCCKKKKKKKK No I wouldn't give more than a 3rd rounder. I know when healthy Revis is Elite and the best but who knows how healthy he is and will be and if its just a year rental is not worth more than 1 pick. Give the Jets our #93 3rd rounder and no more for Revis or count me out.

You lost me at "I like Skip Bayless"

Whatya talkin bout? Skip Bayless is one of the Very few ESPn Personalities that actually always Defends the 49ers and picks them to go to the Super Bowlin 20111 and this past 2012 Season, he also makes points sometimes but he is wrong about giving up so many picks for Revis, No way would I give up that many picks for any one player ever

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:00 AM

#578

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by Jikkle49:

Originally posted by Jcool:

Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet

RT @AlbertBreer: My understanding is that the Niners aren't talking with the Jets on Revis. At least not now. SF source: "We're not in it."

Not to say it's untrue but it would make absolutely 0 sense for an SF source to let it leak they were highly interested in him and it make sense to leak you weren't "interested". Just like how the Jets leaked the Falcons were "interested"

Remember how we weren't "interested" in Manning last year but only "evaluating" him

I think the trade is still unlikely but I don't really buy into sources from either side.

Exactly! You get it...

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:03 AM

#579

Cjez
Hall of Fame
Posts: 163,067

‏@mattbarrows Told that the #49ers haven't even discussed a trade for Darrelle Revis with the Jets. Team was preoccupied with other trade matters.

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM

#580

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
‏@mattbarrows Told that the #49ers haven't even discussed a trade for Darrelle Revis with the Jets. Team was preoccupied with other trade matters.

Uh huh. That said, if this part is true, I wonder who the "trade" considerations are.

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM

#581

NinerBuff
The Election Dude
Posts: 21,443

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
‏@mattbarrows Told that the #49ers haven't even discussed a trade for Darrelle Revis with the Jets. Team was preoccupied with other trade matters.

Uh huh. That said, if this part is true, I wonder who the "trade" considerations are.

Maybe the finer points of the Alex Smith trade?

Can't think of any other trade that makes sense

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:12 AM

#582

Jcool
Veteran
Posts: 43,467

Matt Barrows ‏@mattbarrows

Revis-related: How bad was the #49ers secondary in 2012? (It's a trick question).... http://sacb.ee/ZqkuQl

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:13 AM

#583

9ersLiferInChicago
Veteran
Posts: 10,069

49ers not interested. Too expensive and uncertainty about the knee.
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/9022182/san-francisco-49ers-serious-suitor-darrelle-revis-source

Keep it moving . . . . . .

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:15 AM

#584

Jcool
Veteran
Posts: 43,467

Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet

Smart men: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000146266/article/darrelle-revis-trade-talk-buccaneers-eagles-49ers-among-fits ;… MT @AdamSchein: I asked 2 NFL GMs via text what is the best and most realistic fit for Revis: Tampa.

Mar 6, 2013 at 9:18 AM

#585

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by NinerBuff:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
‏@mattbarrows Told that the #49ers haven't even discussed a trade for Darrelle Revis with the Jets. Team was preoccupied with other trade matters.

Uh huh. That said, if this part is true, I wonder who the "trade" considerations are.

Maybe the finer points of the Alex Smith trade? Can't think of any other trade that makes sense

Seriously. With 15 draft picks, I wonder if we're shopping a lot more than we all realize.