Anyone excited to see LeMichael James play? | Page 14

tony2cool4u2k1 · 2012-11-27T17:54:13-08:00

As a native Oregonian who have seen many Ducks games through the years, I for once, am excited to see what LMJ can bring to the table now that Hunter is on IR. Yes, i know that he hasn't been playing all year but that was because we are so loaded at RBs that he couldn't get on the field. This is a blessing in disguise similiar to the AS and CK7 situation. Now we have speed all over the field. Imagine the LBs have to cover for both LMJ and Kap at the same time. Pick your poison.This team is gonna be about SPEED, LOTS AND LOTS OF IT!!! COuld u imagine the Triple Option or Wildcat being ran w/ those two, and all the WRs and TEs that the opposition have to cover. I've just jizzed my pants thinking abt it

Dec 4, 2012 at 5:25 PM

#196

zillabeast
Veteran
Posts: 20,042

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:

Originally posted by zillabeast:

"THE WAIT IS OVER."

LaMichael James: My tweet is not bout Ftball lol

Tuesday, December 4, 2012 at 16:56:26

Dec 4, 2012 at 5:26 PM

#197

crabman82
Veteran
Posts: 17,024

Trenton Robinson ‏@T_Robinson39
Happy for my bro @LaMichaelJames finally get to ball on these boys good things come with patience

Dec 4, 2012 at 6:31 PM

#198

Allx9er
Veteran
Posts: 11,690

He'll be on the field for one play as a decoy

Dec 4, 2012 at 10:14 PM

#199

FL9er
Veteran
Posts: 10,889

He'll dress but won't play

Dec 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM

#200

Magzarillious
Veteran
Posts: 739

Listen guys if he can help us win then he will play. Coach is taking his time with the rookies, there is nothing wrong with that.

Dec 5, 2012 at 4:57 AM

#201

LBSI9ers
Veteran
Posts: 1,458

Originally posted by RonMexico:
is he going to play?

agreed

Dec 5, 2012 at 4:57 AM

#202

LBSI9ers
Veteran
Posts: 1,458

Originally posted by FL9er:
He'll dress but won't play

maybe not.

Dec 5, 2012 at 6:00 AM

#203

English
Moderator
Posts: 41,391

I don't see we have any choice but to play him.

Dec 5, 2012 at 6:15 AM

#204

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 65,216

Originally posted by English:
I don't see we have any choice but to play him.

I'd rather go with Dixon.

Dec 5, 2012 at 7:59 AM

#205

ninerfan4life
Veteran
Posts: 26,817

He better play because Jacobs and Dixon will not cut it as back up RBs to Gore.

Dec 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM

#206

VDSF
Veteran
Posts: 5,971

Originally posted by FL9er:
He'll dress but won't play

Dec 5, 2012 at 8:21 AM

#207

Rsrkshn
Veteran
Posts: 1,486

Try him, at least. Some players practice better than they play; some play better than they practice. He has electric running skills. He may surprise you, coach.

Dec 5, 2012 at 7:51 PM

#208

Allx9er
Veteran
Posts: 11,690

Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by English:
I don't see we have any choice but to play him.

I'd rather go with Dixon.

Really?

Dec 5, 2012 at 8:01 PM

#209

DelCed2486
Veteran
Posts: 7,158

Originally posted by gavindirishmen:
Because if he doesn't know what the F*** he's doing out there he can get Colin killed. He's still a rookie.
Blitz pickup and recognizing defenses is important.

Not everyone is as stupid as Lawrence Phillips...if James is, then they made a big mistake in drafting him.

Dec 5, 2012 at 8:08 PM

#210

DelCed2486
Veteran
Posts: 7,158

Originally posted by mayo49:
I'd rather go with Dixon.

Why, so you can have yet more back to slam up the gut in the Jumbo? He might be a step faster than Gore and Jacobs but still nothing that defenses have to be concerned that he can go off-T and get around the corner.