There are 80 users in the forums
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Post on Google+
- Post on LinkedIn
- Post on Digg
- Post on Delicious
- Post on StumbleUpon
- Post on Reddit
- Post on Tumblr
IF IT COMES DOWN TO IT, WOULD YOU SHARE THE NEW STADIUM W/ THE RAIDERS ?
IF IT COMES DOWN TO IT, WOULD YOU SHARE THE NEW STADIUM W/ THE RAIDERS ?
Dec 13, 2012 at 16:43:33
#331
- NJNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,976
Dec 13, 2012 at 16:45:40
#332
- Happs
- Veteran
- Posts: 549
Originally posted by VA49er:
The question is better put to the people who invested in the stadium. I think their answer would be a unanimous. YES.
Well I have bought 8000 bucks worth of SBLs. Not a massive investor obviously but they have my money. Definite No.
Dec 13, 2012 at 16:49:06
#333
- hondakillerzx
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,263
f**k no. i dont even like going to warriors games because i have to see their ugly ass stadium
Dec 13, 2012 at 17:07:00
#334
- SkyGod
- Member
- Posts: 294
Oakland > Los Angeles
Jacksonville > London
Buffalo > Toronto
Jacksonville > London
Buffalo > Toronto
Dec 13, 2012 at 17:48:31
#335
- artiga1
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,131
I'd seriously rather stay in Candlestick forever than share a brand new stadium with THEM
Dec 13, 2012 at 17:50:45
#336
- GhostofFredDean74
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,199
I don't have a problem with it. What our ownership does with the stadium when my team isn't playing means squat to me. They can have a Jerry Sandusky fan club meeting there for all I care.
[ Edited by GhostofFredDean74 on Dec 13, 2012 at 17:52:41 ]
Dec 15, 2012 at 06:14:53
#337
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,811
Ah, no.
Dec 15, 2012 at 06:31:34
#338
- LBSI9ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 760
no
Dec 15, 2012 at 06:32:03
#339
- LBSI9ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 760
Originally posted by mayo49:
Ah, no.
just made it even simpler
Dec 15, 2012 at 06:38:04
#340
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,811
Originally posted by LBSI9ers:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Ah, no.
just made it even simpler
You old fox.
Dec 15, 2012 at 07:52:04
#341
- 2000sooners
- Member
- Posts: 138
Originally posted by marshniners24:
SERIOUSLY COOL IT WITH THE CAPS ALL YOUR THREADS SUBJECTS ARE IN CAPS...WTF
whats the big deal?
Dec 15, 2012 at 08:37:16
#342
- bluecoller49ninerfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 231
If it makes the tickets cheaper..if not hell 2 the no.....than we would have outlined body chalkings everywere. Crack pipes left in the bathrooms not to mention the rif raf it would bring to santa clara...
Dec 15, 2012 at 12:38:40
#343
- BayArea
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,535
As long as it is known as 49ers stadium first and foremost and absolutely no Raider logos or anything to do with them is in the stadium and its all 49ers s**t. Also they have to give a draft pick every year they play here and trade us Janakowski for Akers. No calling it the black hole and Raiders fans will have to endure 49ers s**t at every home game. If all those stipulations are met then it's still only a maybe... lol.
Dec 15, 2012 at 14:27:28
#344
- 49erRider
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,430
Originally posted by BayArea:As long as it is known as 49ers stadium first and foremost and absolutely no Raider logos or anything to do with them is in the stadium and its all 49ers s**t. Also they have to give a draft pick every year they play here and trade us Janakowski for Akers. No calling it the black hole and Raiders fans will have to endure 49ers s**t at every home game. If all those stipulations are met then it's still only a maybe... lol.
All stipulations met - still a big fat NO.
Dec 15, 2012 at 15:20:49
#345
- Frisco69ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,424
this isnt even a possibility anymore, why are we still talking about it?
©1997-2013 49erswebzone.com. Part of Skybox 360 Media, LLC
