There are 141 users in the forums
Originally posted by jgalvan:
If Brady would of played with JM he would just be another Dan Marino. Good but not good enough because Joe always took him out.
Originally posted by 9er_84:Originally posted by wolfpack219:
Ya it's amazing how when Tom Brady is under constant pressure he looks like s**t and constantly rolls out to his right. Geese if I recall that reminds me our OL and QB situation. I wonder how Alex would look if he actually had CONSISTENT protection?
he would look how he's been lookin these past 5 seasons....like cr>p!
Originally posted by Gavintech:Originally posted by jgalvan:
If Brady would of played with JM he would just be another Dan Marino. Good but not good enough because Joe always took him out.
He may not have been in that class at all if he wasn't in the perfect situation for him. I'm thinking more like a Phil Simms at best...
Originally posted by LambdaChi49:
It's like Jordan vs Kobe.
Originally posted by Faceless:Originally posted by LambdaChi49:
It's like Jordan vs Kobe.
Jordan > Kobe
Young>Montana > Brady
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by glorydayz:
Joe Montana would have 10 rings if he played in todays NFL! These days the rules have been talored to suit the offense, you can't even touch the QB! Montana was getting killed!
Montana also played against hall of fame defenses as well as other HOF QB's and he gave them the buisness!
I don't think you can compare today's QB's to JMontana at all!
with all that said, I do like Tom Brady though...
I think he would have less. There is a salary cap now. There is more paridy. Eddie D. couldn't manipulate the system to field the best team every year.
Originally posted by BHulman:
Brady has earned the right to be in the conversation, no doubt. But everyone of Montana's Super Bowl appearances was dominating. He could have easily been given the MVP for the Bengal's game (though I have no argument with Rice getting it). He never lost it nor did he rely on a field goal kicker (twice) to determine the outcome.
Originally posted by DesiDez:
1) Montana played in different era. They had less teams, the no salary cap allowed you to build "super-teams" like the 49ers, Parcells Giants, Gibbs Redskins, and Ditkas Bears, plus the rules back then weren't so bias towards the offense.
2) Montana won 2 super bowls w/o Rice. He had Clark, Solomon, Wendell Tyler, Craig, Russ Francis.
3) Montana dominated in his Super Bowls: he blew out the Dolphins and Broncos.
4) Brady lost a SB and his Patriots won each SB by only a FG. I'll give Brady credit for leading them on game-winning drives each time though.
5) Brady is the closest thing to Montana though and I think he's better than Manning (far better, btw)
Montana > Brady > Manning
Originally posted by Giggiddy:
Joe Montana has never lost a superbowl.
End of conversation.
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:Originally posted by Giggiddy:
Joe Montana has never lost a superbowl.
End of conversation.
There IS, nothing else to say..
Except that the Niners dominated a couple of them, Brady's played all close SB, a couple of the SB he won going down to the last FG.. Another BIG dif..
I don't have to get used to it.
Montana played in an era when you could hit the QB, when WR could be held, etc.. this is puss league now a days.. Oh NO! I'm dizzy, better sit out for a few weeks..
Hooo Whawwwwww!