There are 87 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Where are all the "realists" posters?

Originally posted by kronik:
I haven't seen alot of realists post since our week 1 victory. Are they all coincidentally too busy to visit the zone all of a sudden? Not trying to embarass them (well maybe a little) or anything but I have a few questions for you guys:

1. Did you guys think we were going to ARI and beat the defending NFC champions at their home?

2. Have your realistic views change since our victory?

3. What do you think our overall record will be this year?

Singfan, Sabrason, where are you guys????

1. Yeah I knew once the schedule came out we were gonna win that game.

2. No I knew we would win this division, our division, the NFC West.

3. 10-6, just a educated guess.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,925
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
I haven't seen alot of realists post since our week 1 victory. Are they all coincidentally too busy to visit the zone all of a sudden? Not trying to embarass them (well maybe a little) or anything but I have a few questions for you guys:

1. Did you guys think we were going to ARI and beat the defending NFC champions at their home?

2. Have your realistic views change since our victory?

3. What do you think our overall record will be this year?

Singfan, Sabrason, where are you guys????

Quote:
Where are all the "realists" posters?

Someone said you were lookin for me. HERE I GO!

1. I thought we had a chance cause Zona looked bad all preseason. Add the Breaston injury and Boldin out for a while. They couldn't have gotten in sync.

2. Not really. We still need a REAL QB and a better O-line. Though the defense played better than expected. But is that because they aren't yet in sync or did we really play that good? We'll see!

3. 6-10 to 7-9 same as before.

OK, cool. Glad to see some realists still have some pride and aren't afraid to keep posting. Sometimes, it gets kinda boring without u guys.

BTW, I agree with u on the QB and RT issues.

I just hope to get the same respect WHEN the wheels fall off!

Define "wheels fall off."

Losing to good opponents don't count, do they?




This is niner talk. Believe me, you'll know when the wheels fall off!
Originally posted by waiting4number6:
Originally posted by kronik:
I haven't seen alot of realists post since our week 1 victory. Are they all coincidentally too busy to visit the zone all of a sudden? Not trying to embarass them (well maybe a little) or anything but I have a few questions for you guys:

1. Did you guys think we were going to ARI and beat the defending NFC champions at their home?

2. Have your realistic views change since our victory?

3. What do you think our overall record will be this year?

Singfan, Sabrason, where are you guys????

1. Yeah I knew once the schedule came out we were gonna win that game.

2. No I knew we would win this division, our division, the NFC West.

3. 10-6, just a educated guess.

LOL, you aren't a "realists" The "realists" called you (and me) a homer.
[ Edited by kronik on Sep 16, 2009 at 9:57 PM ]
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by kronik:
I haven't seen alot of realists post since our week 1 victory. Are they all coincidentally too busy to visit the zone all of a sudden? Not trying to embarass them (well maybe a little) or anything but I have a few questions for you guys:

1. Did you guys think we were going to ARI and beat the defending NFC champions at their home?

2. Have your realistic views change since our victory?

3. What do you think our overall record will be this year?

Singfan, Sabrason, where are you guys????


1. No

2. No

3. If we continue the run, run, run, punt philosophy.......only to revert to sheer desperation at game's end and force our QB to convert 4-5 3rd downs on 1 drive just to give ourselves a chance to win..............we will end up 4-12, I guarantee it.


I must admit.....I was very surprised (and SHOCKED) at our team this past weekend. Not because we won; we always give Zona a run for their money. But rather because our DEFENSE, after years of failure, finally showed up. Too bad all their effort was almost negated by Raye, and the only way he could get us out of this mess was put the ball in Shaun Hill's hands and hope he could pull us through.

Continue this strategy and we're toast against a real opponent.

Uhhhh, the team that made it to the Super Bowl isn't a"real opponent" ?
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by waiting4number6:
Originally posted by kronik:
I haven't seen alot of realists post since our week 1 victory. Are they all coincidentally too busy to visit the zone all of a sudden? Not trying to embarass them (well maybe a little) or anything but I have a few questions for you guys:

1. Did you guys think we were going to ARI and beat the defending NFC champions at their home?

2. Have your realistic views change since our victory?

3. What do you think our overall record will be this year?

Singfan, Sabrason, where are you guys????

1. Yeah I knew once the schedule came out we were gonna win that game.

2. No I knew we would win this division, our division, the NFC West.

3. 10-6, just a educated guess.

LOL, I guess you are a "realists" The "realists" called you (and me) a homer.

That's what some of my friends, and peepz have told me when I've said some things to that effect we're gonna win the division and we're better than Zona and what not, I just know we have the best football team in the NFC West.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,925
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

But you did call out ALL "realists" You can say haters. Don't have to dress it up with the quotations. No need to be politically correct in here.
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

But you did call out ALL "realists" You can say haters. Don't have to dress it up with the quotations. No need to be politically correct in here.

I have to be politically correct if I want this thread to stay alive. Besides, there is a difference between negative nellys, debbie downers vs haters and trolls.
[ Edited by kronik on Sep 16, 2009 at 10:05 PM ]
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,925
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

But you did call out ALL "realists" You can say haters. Don't have to dress it up with the quotations. No need to be politically correct in here.

I have to be politically correct if I want this thread to stay alive. Besides, there is a difference between negative nellys, debbie downers vs haters and trolls.

A: As if the Mods don't see where this thread is heading.

B: If they are indeed trolls. not only are you not going to get anything out of starting this thread (except more irritated than you are now apparently or you wouldn't have started this thread) but you're also contributing to their behavior.

A lose/lose in my book! Your keyboard only has so many keystrokes in it!
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

But you did call out ALL "realists" You can say haters. Don't have to dress it up with the quotations. No need to be politically correct in here.

I have to be politically correct if I want this thread to stay alive. Besides, there is a difference between negative nellys, debbie downers vs haters and trolls.

A: As if the Mods don't see where this thread is heading.

B: If they are indeed trolls. not only are you not going to get anything out of starting this thread (except more irritated than you are now apparently or you wouldn't have started this thread) but you're also contributing to their behavior.

A lose/lose in my book! Your keyboard only has so many keystrokes in it!

He makes a realistic point.
6-10
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

question: why call them out?? different strokes for different folks...

- 98
Originally posted by kidash98:
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by oldninerdude:
I don't think its fair to use the term "realist" if you're talking about certain trolls. Those guys call themselves "realists" but they're really just living in the past, or trying to. "If we only had Bill Walsh as our coach once more" is not being realistic.

Those who take a reasonable view of what they see on the field are actually realists, and that includes a great number of guys who post on this board.

For example, it seems reasonable to say that the jury's still out on Raye's ability as a play caller--that's realistic. Likewise, the issues with the OL appear reasonable and realistic at the present time.

"Singletary should be immediately replaced with Shanahan" would not seem to be reasonable or realistic. Posting such a comment is just trolling for an angry response. IMHO.

Agreed brother, but THEY called themselves "realists", not me. They didn't see themselves as trolls.

Sabrason and singfan are the 2 that comes to mind.

question: why call them out?? different strokes for different folks...

- 98

Probably because of some of their "guarantees"
super bowl