There are 103 users in the forums
Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?

Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?
Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?
Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by English:
Are we so sad now that there is an assumption of sacking? How about making a case for it before inviting comments?
Alex Smith
Vernon Davis
Manny Lawson
Kentwan Balmer
Michael Crabtree
You need your first rounders to make an impact and ours have not made a big impact. There's your case. In defense of Scott M., he's picked up some really nice players in the later rounds. Still, you can't be whiffing with all of the Ones.
Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?
Originally posted by nekst:Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by English:
Are we so sad now that there is an assumption of sacking? How about making a case for it before inviting comments?
Alex Smith
Vernon Davis
Manny Lawson
Kentwan Balmer
Michael Crabtree
You need your first rounders to make an impact and ours have not made a big impact. There's your case. In defense of Scott M., he's picked up some really nice players in the later rounds. Still, you can't be whiffing with all of the Ones.
First of all, I'm not sure if you're aware... but Kentwan Balmer is a defensive linemen. Players don't normally make a big impact at that position right away. And it's not like Balmer was a top-ten pick. He was picked towards the END of Round 1. Plus, he has been looking pretty good in preseason. Let's give Balmer a chance shall we?
Second of all, I can't believe you actually included Michael Crabtree on this list. We haven't even signed him yet. How is he supposed to make a big impact already?
And lastly, Patrick Willis and Joe Staley are "Ones" too, but you're implying that "all of the ones" have failed to make an impact. That is incorrect.
Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?
Originally posted by Mex49:Originally posted by singfan:
If you booted him today, the franchise would be better for it. You all are attempting to justify his below mediocre existence. This franchise has already seen enough of McCloughan, Sing and Raye. It is just absolutely terrible. What quality franchise would have these three in place? How much longer do we need to be punished?
Your name is SINGFAN
yeah really?
Originally posted by 9er2k:Originally posted by Mex49:Originally posted by 9er2k:Originally posted by miked1978:
You fairweather fans kill me. You guys would have called for his head if he didn't draft Crabtree at #10. Hell we would have been the laughing stock of the draft if we passed on Crabs. He also got us 2 first rounders last year.
No offense bro but if a top 5 talent is on the board you have to take him and it was a good move to get us two 1st rounders next year but I ask again how many of his 1st round picks pan out?
Which ones were the busts? Nolan was the the final word for the 2005 and 2006 and probably the 2007 season And there is a big gap bewtween a P. Willis pick (HOF) and A Rashan Woods (where are you now) kind of pick and so far, Scotty aint no where close to have made a Woods type pick
Well Woods was a Donahue pick.The point here is even if Nolan had final say Scott was the one doing all the scouting and Nolan was going off the information given to him by Scott.Besides Gore and Willis I don't see a whole lot of talent coming in from the draft(Brandon Williams anyone?)
Originally posted by nekst:Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by English:
Are we so sad now that there is an assumption of sacking? How about making a case for it before inviting comments?
Alex Smith
Vernon Davis
Manny Lawson
Kentwan Balmer
Michael Crabtree
You need your first rounders to make an impact and ours have not made a big impact. There's your case. In defense of Scott M., he's picked up some really nice players in the later rounds. Still, you can't be whiffing with all of the Ones.
First of all, I'm not sure if you're aware... but Kentwan Balmer is a defensive linemen. Players don't normally make a big impact at that position right away. And it's not like Balmer was a top-ten pick. He was picked towards the END of Round 1. Plus, he has been looking pretty good in preseason. Let's give Balmer a chance shall we?
Second of all, I can't believe you actually included Michael Crabtree on this list. We haven't even signed him yet. How is he supposed to make a big impact already?
And lastly, Patrick Willis and Joe Staley are "Ones" too, but you're implying that "all of the ones" have failed to make an impact. That is incorrect.
Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by nekst:Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by English:
Are we so sad now that there is an assumption of sacking? How about making a case for it before inviting comments?
Alex Smith
Vernon Davis
Manny Lawson
Kentwan Balmer
Michael Crabtree
You need your first rounders to make an impact and ours have not made a big impact. There's your case. In defense of Scott M., he's picked up some really nice players in the later rounds. Still, you can't be whiffing with all of the Ones.
First of all, I'm not sure if you're aware... but Kentwan Balmer is a defensive linemen. Players don't normally make a big impact at that position right away. And it's not like Balmer was a top-ten pick. He was picked towards the END of Round 1. Plus, he has been looking pretty good in preseason. Let's give Balmer a chance shall we?
Second of all, I can't believe you actually included Michael Crabtree on this list. We haven't even signed him yet. How is he supposed to make a big impact already?
And lastly, Patrick Willis and Joe Staley are "Ones" too, but you're implying that "all of the ones" have failed to make an impact. That is incorrect.
Yes, I am aware that the non-existant marshmallow (last year, at least), Kentwan Balmer, is an interior defensive lineman, like Gary Johnson, Michael Carter, Jim Burt, Dana Stubblefield and Bryant Young, who were good impact players for the 49ers.
I include Crabtree on the list because he was regarded by other teams as a head case and a diva. If he remains unsigned, and the Niners eat that pick, that is on McCloughan. If he signs, I will certainly be rooting for him and hope he lives up to all the hype.
Lastly, I didn't imply anything. Willis and Staley were good picks. The others don't look so good. Experience tells me that good players jump out at you, regardless of their place in draft. Ronnie Lott, it was obvious immediately the guy was a stud. Jerry Rice showed signs very early, despite a shaky first half of the first season. T.O., stud out of the gate. Charles Haley, despite being picked later than the featured pick, Larry Roberts, was clearly an impact pass rusher early. Along those lines, I have great hopes for Nate Davis. I know he's playing the scrubs, but he looks like a natural.
So, I credited Scott with picking up some nice steals in the later rounds, and I did not dismiss Willis or Staley as you suggest in your straw man argument. I merely pointed out the obvious, that many of Scott's first rounders are looking like duds, and that hurts.
Originally posted by BSofSF:Originally posted by English:
Are we so sad now that there is an assumption of sacking? How about making a case for it before inviting comments?
Alex Smith
Vernon Davis
Manny Lawson
Kentwan Balmer
Michael Crabtree
You need your first rounders to make an impact and ours have not made a big impact. There's your case. In defense of Scott M., he's picked up some really nice players in the later rounds. Still, you can't be whiffing with all of the Ones.