Smash for Cash

Oct 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM

Brando85
Veteran
Posts: 100

Looks like Pete Carroll brought over a cash incentive prgram to SF when he was the defensive coordinator
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/19/smash-for-cash-feature-shows-that-pay-for-performance-was-accepted-in-1996/

[ Edited by Brando85 on Oct 19, 2012 at 4:21 PM ]

Oct 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM

Young2Rice
Veteran
Posts: 70,010

Cash was paid for hits, fumbles and big plays like ints.

Saints took it another level and gave cash for INJURIES.

Thats just wrong.

Oct 19, 2012 at 4:39 PM

CityKing415
Veteran
Posts: 3,901

that title is pretty misleading lol..

Oct 19, 2012 at 4:40 PM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

meh that was 16 years ago.

Oct 19, 2012 at 4:42 PM

Gore_21
Veteran
Posts: 12,684

Originally posted by Young2Rice:
Cash was paid for hits, fumbles and big plays like ints.

Saints took it another level and gave cash for INJURIES.

Thats just wrong.

This /thread

Also, back then there were no rules really against hitting defenseless receivers or helmet to helmet or roughing the QB. You could hit them 10 seconds after he threw and there wouldn't be a penalty. It was a different NFL. Honestly, I have no problem with players or teams giving money to players if they get an int, ff, fr, td, big it, etc as long as it's a legal hit. Once you start paying players for injuries than you are crossing the line.

Oct 19, 2012 at 5:58 PM

ads_2006
Veteran
Posts: 56,518

took it to USC as

but that was "Dash for Cash"

Oct 19, 2012 at 8:20 PM

Tman
Veteran
Posts: 13,276

Oct 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM

zillabeast
Veteran
Posts: 20,042

Originally posted by Tman:

I'd go 6 no higher

Oct 21, 2012 at 9:25 AM

Tman
Veteran
Posts: 13,276

Originally posted by zillabeast:

Originally posted by Tman:

I'd go 6 no higher

man id drop at least 6.50 on her