Originally posted by dugo:
I don't understand any of that ruling, Its sounds so contradicting , Were they found guilty of anything ? Can anyone please explain..
Basically the ruling says the team is at fault for the bounty program and the players (some more than others) went along with it
The coaches should be fined and suspended but the players suspensions were too harsh
Coaches deserved the suspensions because the DC was responsible for the program while HC knew about it didn't stop it and covered it up and lied about it