There are 122 users in the forums
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Then Brady would have broke Brees record.
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Then Brady would have broke Brees record.
Um, that.
Originally posted by zillabeast:That would kick ass. I'd rather Brady have it.
Originally posted by susweel:
It messes up the space time continuum.
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Then Brady would have broke Brees record.
Originally posted by Ether:
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Then Brady would have broke Brees record.
I just found it funny the media has been making Drew Brees to be the greatest QB to play the game cause he broke this record, but they refuse to acknowledge the fact that Tom Brady is only a very pedestrian game away from breaking a record Brees just set a couple days ago (and needed to run up the score to do so).
Originally posted by Ether:
Tom Brady has 4897 passing yards and the Patriots need to win to lock up the #1 seed for the AFC (unless the Ravens lose). Because we determine the Saints' seed next week with our game against St. Louis, there's a chance Drew Brees will not be playing the entire game. Brady needs only 190 yards to break Brees' record...
Originally posted by danimal:
The fact that there is 3 QB's breaking or seriously threatening records speaks more about todays NFL, then it does about the particular QB's historical greatness. So these records are less meaningful now to anyone except the casual fan

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Originally posted by danimal:
The fact that there is 3 QB's breaking or seriously threatening records speaks more about todays NFL, then it does about the particular QB's historical greatness. So these records are less meaningful now to anyone except the casual fan
I totally agree. It has to do with rule changes. I have no idea what Marino, Elway would have done with these rules. Imagine Rice in his prime with the current receiving rules.
But still good for Brees, Rodgers, and Brady if they do it. Doesnt change my mind on greatness though.