There are 296 users in the forums
How concerned are you??
- 1 2
Dec 27, 2011 at 12:59 PM
- LionHeartofGold
- Veteran
- Posts: 772
How concerned are you faithful, not about beating the Lambs, but about the Colts beating the Jags, which would almost assuredly send Andrew Luck to the Rams and become our biggest foe for years to come???
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:01 PM
- Jakemall
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,598
Not sure Rams take Luck..they probably trade out of the pick...
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:01 PM
- boast
- Hella Fame
- Posts: 149,574
Originally posted by LionHeartofGold:
How concerned are you faithful, not about beating the Lambs, but about the Colts beating the Jags, which would almost assuredly send Andrew Luck to the Rams and become our biggest foe for years to come???
i really doubt they draft Luck. Bradford's contract is too expensive to trade or cut. they trade out, IMO.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,482
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by LionHeartofGold:
How concerned are you faithful, not about beating the Lambs, but about the Colts beating the Jags, which would almost assuredly send Andrew Luck to the Rams and become our biggest foe for years to come???
i really doubt they draft Luck. Bradford's contract is too expensive to trade or cut. they trade out, IMO.
+1
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM
- TonyStarks
- Veteran
- Posts: 60,631
Luck isn't Peyton anyways.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM
- LionHeartofGold
- Veteran
- Posts: 772
Originally posted by Jakemall:
Not sure Rams take Luck..they probably trade out of the pick...
Despite the lack of feasibility with the Rams taking Luck or trading him, it's still a HUGE temptation for the Rams organization and one that makes me uncomfortable. Anything can happen when you have trigger in hand and the #1 pick.
[ Edited by LionHeartofGold on Dec 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM ]
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:04 PM
- Juniorminime
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,021
Luck is way way overhyped....
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM
- LionHeartofGold
- Veteran
- Posts: 772
Luck indeed is overhyped, but very talented nonetheless. He will be an NFL starter and quickly.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:07 PM
- boast
- Hella Fame
- Posts: 149,574
Originally posted by LionHeartofGold:
Originally posted by Jakemall:
Not sure Rams take Luck..they probably trade out of the pick...
Despite the lack of feasibility with the Rams taking Luck or trading him, it's still a HUGE temptation for the Rams organization and one that makes me uncomfortable. Anything can happen when you have trigger in hand and the #1 pick.
trading the pick is far more enticing from the Rams point of view. they have holes everywhere.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:10 PM
- LionHeartofGold
- Veteran
- Posts: 772
Originally posted by boast:
trading the pick is far more enticing from the Rams point of view. they have holes everywhere.
You are likely correct, and the Rams are not likely to trade Luck to a divisional rival. Time to go do my homework on the Colts vs Jags game.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:11 PM
- Marvin49
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 16,501
Gonna get flamed for this....
....not concerned at all about Luck.
After watching SF this year I know really beleive something I suspected before. I think Luck is over-rated (ducking and looking around for flying fruit). I think he's a product of that system that made Josh Johnson the highest rated QB in college football history and has Alex Smith in the Pro Bowl discussion.
I'm more concerned with them trading the pick for multiple #1s.
....not concerned at all about Luck.
After watching SF this year I know really beleive something I suspected before. I think Luck is over-rated (ducking and looking around for flying fruit). I think he's a product of that system that made Josh Johnson the highest rated QB in college football history and has Alex Smith in the Pro Bowl discussion.
I'm more concerned with them trading the pick for multiple #1s.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:15 PM
- blunt_probe
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,649
I'm not concerned since we now have a legit coaching staff and GM. If we're good ourselves, it doesn't matter what the competition does.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:24 PM
- Marvin49
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 16,501
Originally posted by Marvin49:
Gonna get flamed for this....
....not concerned at all about Luck.
After watching SF this year I know really beleive something I suspected before. I think Luck is over-rated (ducking and looking around for flying fruit). I think he's a product of that system that made Josh Johnson the highest rated QB in college football history and has Alex Smith in the Pro Bowl discussion.
I'm more concerned with them trading the pick for multiple #1s.
or maybe not. It appears I wasn't the only person thinking this. LOL!!
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:37 PM
- BobS
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,695
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
I'm not concerned since we now have a legit coaching staff and GM. If we're good ourselves, it doesn't matter what the competition does.
Exactly, I think having Harbaugh as coach will be a major asset against him. If Luck has any hidden weaknesses Harbaugh will know them and exploit them.
Dec 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM
- Delinquentwayz
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,784
Originally posted by BobS:
Exactly, I think having Harbaugh as coach will be a major asset against him. If Luck has any hidden weaknesses Harbaugh will know them and exploit them.
^^^ this right here....
- 1 2