
There are 333 users in the forums

Originally posted by Crazy49er1313:
I'm trememndously impressed with his analysis and breakdown of players. Granted his speech patterns are "rake against a chalkboard" painful, he knows his stuff and have to show some respect
Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by Crazy49er1313:
I'm trememndously impressed with his analysis and breakdown of players. Granted his speech patterns are "rake against a chalkboard" painful, he knows his stuff and have to show some respect
its not just for the TV camera...
he would always analyze to the tee his upcoming opponents...even about their personal lives (wait, that last one could've been John Randle)
they did a special about him a while back while he was with the Vikings.
Originally posted by Crazy49er1313:
I'm trememndously impressed with his analysis and breakdown of players. Granted his speech patterns are "rake against a chalkboard" painful, he knows his stuff and have to show some respect
Originally posted by PatrickJira411:
His delivery still needs some work (though it has gotten better through the years) but dude knows his stuff, he is much better than Charles Davis and like him and Mayock breaking it down though Mayock is on his nuts a little to much.
Originally posted by RedWaltz24:Originally posted by PatrickJira411:
His delivery still needs some work (though it has gotten better through the years) but dude knows his stuff, he is much better than Charles Davis and like him and Mayock breaking it down though Mayock is on his nuts a little to much.
Mayock and him sounded like two guys that just wanted to go off into a private room and talk about some obscure player from William & Mary.
Given that Chavous was a good player at a high level AND applying that knowledge to scouting, he makes other ex-player analysts (looking your ways Steve Young, Michael Irvin, and Deion Sanders) look like they belong in the UFL of broadcasting. I mean, seriously, Steve Young, did he do any preparation for the draft?