There are 102 users in the forums
Originally posted by global_nomad:
we probably would have also scored more than 40 points a game more often
Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by global_nomad:
we probably would have also scored more than 40 points a game more often
you mean with a different OL?
Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by global_nomad:
we probably would have also scored more than 40 points a game more often
you mean with a different OL?
a thread like this is all apples and oranges.
The Packers gave up so many sacks, but also were near the top of the league in big plays and YAC.
They were one pass away from a great comeback and knocking of the defending NFC champs, but they miss a throw, get a holding penalty, and a sack fumble and everyone wants to hate on a Pro Bowler Rodgers.
Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by phatbutskinny:Originally posted by unst4bl3:Originally posted by phatbutskinny:Originally posted by unst4bl3:
If we had drafted Aaron Rodgers, we would have lead the league in sacks (allowed) every season he was playing..
after watching that train wreck, i prefer the roll right, throw it away method..
r u being sarcastic
Nope, id rather watch the Alex smith show, than that AAron rodgers crap, I'm not even close to a pack fan, and I was mad watching him play.
so you don't want a good qb?
Apparently average is good enough for him. He's probably a huge fan of Arnaz Battlle and Michael Robinson as well. Mediocrity is loved around here.
i love how people just assume the Aaron Rodgers on the Packers would be the same dude we wouldve drafted. any QB in a Niner uniform the last 5 years would suck, because the OL sucks.
this is becoming an epidemic in the 49er fanbase. fans are so obsessed with having a good QB, they become completely oblivious to the fact that we HAVE NO OL. bad OL = bad QB. period. end of story.
whether his name is Smith, or Manning, or Brady, or Rodgers, or Brees, or anyone. bad OL = bad QB. say it with me. its not a hard concept.
Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by phatbutskinny:Originally posted by unst4bl3:Originally posted by phatbutskinny:Originally posted by unst4bl3:
If we had drafted Aaron Rodgers, we would have lead the league in sacks (allowed) every season he was playing..
after watching that train wreck, i prefer the roll right, throw it away method..
r u being sarcastic
Nope, id rather watch the Alex smith show, than that AAron rodgers crap, I'm not even close to a pack fan, and I was mad watching him play.
so you don't want a good qb?
Apparently average is good enough for him. He's probably a huge fan of Arnaz Battlle and Michael Robinson as well. Mediocrity is loved around here.
i love how people just assume the Aaron Rodgers on the Packers would be the same dude we wouldve drafted. any QB in a Niner uniform the last 5 years would suck, because the OL sucks.
this is becoming an epidemic in the 49er fanbase. fans are so obsessed with having a good QB, they become completely oblivious to the fact that we HAVE NO OL. bad OL = bad QB. period. end of story.
whether his name is Smith, or Manning, or Brady, or Rodgers, or Brees, or anyone. bad OL = bad QB. say it with me. its not a hard concept.
Rodgers line was more worse than ours.
Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by global_nomad:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by global_nomad:
we probably would have also scored more than 40 points a game more often
you mean with a different OL?
a thread like this is all apples and oranges.
The Packers gave up so many sacks, but also were near the top of the league in big plays and YAC.
They were one pass away from a great comeback and knocking of the defending NFC champs, but they miss a throw, get a holding penalty, and a sack fumble and everyone wants to hate on a Pro Bowler Rodgers.
lol you say "defending NFC champs" like the 49ers didnt beat them twice this year without issue.
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Rodgers > Smith at this point in their careers.
By your logic, you'd rather have Smith over Manning, Warner or any other pocket passer.
Originally posted by dhp318:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by 49erRider:
What about the multiple times he rolled right, scanned and found a receiver? Would you still prefer the roll right, stare down one guy and throw it away approach?
what about the first play of the game, when he rolled right, had time, held the ball too long, and then forced it and threw a pick which led to a quick score, and put them behind all game?
Every QB makes mistakes. You act like he did that the entire game. You're gonna need more than one play to back your argument.
Aaron Rodgers has been consistently the most sacked QB in the league precisely because he holds on to the ball for an eternity in every game I watch him.
